User talk:Pastor Kam

G'day!

G'day there, Pastor Kam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Good authors are always welcome on the project, and I hope you like the place and decide to stick around!

We've got a few pages you might find helpful, such as:

It's all best summed up here: write from a neutral point of view, play nice with others, and don't let the rules get you down.

If you have any questions or need any help, my talkpage is always open for business, or you can see Wikipedia:Newcomers help page. Here's a tip to start you off: if you type four tildes (~~~~) at the end of any messages you leave on talkpages (like this one) Wikipedia will automatically insert your name and the current date and time after your message. Cool, eh? Happy editing! fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 02:27, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moral Orel

Please stop removing Category:Religious animation from the Moral Orel article. Moral Orel is a religiously-themed show. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 16:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Why are you removing [[Category:Christian television]] from all of the shows without explaining? Please explain or you will be reported for vandalism. --Maniwar (talk) 18:21, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:September 2007

Sorry, but I started that article for Christian TV shows that weren't talk shows or evangelistic shows. In other words, it's for scripted shows that feature actors, not talk shows hosts and preachers. Pastor Kam 19:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then perhaps you need to rename the category. The template [[Category:Christian television]] does not reflect "only" those categories you mention. And others will continue to add the category to many shows. Perhaps you need to make one called [[Category:Christian entertainment television]]. --Maniwar (talk) 20:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's a really good idea! I think I'll do that! Thanks! And sorry for upsetting you!

I wasn't upset, but I was wondering if you were committing vandalism. No problem, and good luck with your project. --Maniwar (talk) 03:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bibleman: PowerSource

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bibleman: PowerSource, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Very obscure spin-off of an already obscure series. No articulation of notability, or any indication that it has any prominence at all. No sources (let alone significant coverage in reliable third party sources).

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 10:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bibleman Jr.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bibleman Jr., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Very obscure spin-off of an already obscure series. No articulation of notability, or any indication that it has any prominence at all. No sources (let alone significant coverage in reliable third party sources)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 11:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ewe Know

The article Ewe Know has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

On this article's talk page, someone said that this was a publicity gimmick.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RocketMaster (talk) 16:21, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1984-85 Dallas Sidekicks season

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 1984-85 Dallas Sidekicks season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Comatmebro (talk) 01:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2002 Dallas Burn season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chicago Fire, Spartan Stadium, Titan Stadium, Mike Jeffries and Carlos Ruiz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2003 Dallas Burn season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chicago Fire, Spartan Stadium and Dragon Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2005 FC Dallas season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chicago Fire, Spartan Stadium and Carlos Ruiz

2004 Dallas Burn season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chicago Fire and Spartan Stadium

2006 FC Dallas season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chicago Fire and Eddie Robinson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2007 FC Dallas season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chicago Fire and Carlos Ruiz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2008 FC Dallas season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Torchlighters: Heroes of the Faith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Torchlighters: Heroes of the Faith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Torchlighters: Heroes of the Faith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 08:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Little Dogs on the Prairie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Little Dogs on the Prairie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Dogs on the Prairie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dronebogus (talk) 21:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of K10C: Kids' Ten Commandments for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K10C: Kids' Ten Commandments is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K10C: Kids' Ten Commandments until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dronebogus (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Friends and Heroes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Friends and Heroes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friends and Heroes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dronebogus (talk) 04:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Animated Hero Classics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Animated Hero Classics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animated Hero Classics (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dronebogus (talk) 10:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Animated Stories from the Bible for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Animated Stories from the Bible is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animated Stories from the Bible until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dronebogus (talk) 10:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hermie and Friends for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hermie and Friends is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermie and Friends until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]