User talk:Password10

January 2017

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User:RolandR— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:37, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Password10

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Password10, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 23:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

i will require another chance and the standard offer has been accepted so you better unblock me

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Password10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i will require another chance and the standard offer has been accepted so you better unblock me Password10 (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's not how it works. Demands are totally inappropriate in an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 00:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you are clearly trolling, I've revoked talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]