User talk:Parvesh13
IP address from which I edited has been blocked
[edit]A range of IP address from which I used to edit has been blocked. I admit once again that I used multiple accounts.
Was I involved in vandalism ?
[edit]In my initial days of joining wikipidea, I had some edit conflicts. So I should have discussed them on talk page. But at that time I was unaware about the concept of discussing and solving problems in talk page of different articles. That is the reason I couldn't solve those edit conflicts. But that is my fault and I feel sorry for that. Though later on, I learnt how to discuss the issues on talk page.
Why was I 'permanently' banned first time in sock-puppetry allegations ?
[edit]I admit that I used three profiles in the initial phase (Iamtrhino, Desijatt and Arinjatt). The reason I used multiple accounts earlier (one month earlier) was that I was unaware about the sockpuppet rules of wikipidea. But without being warned for that, I was permanently banned.
I was warned of edit conflicts earlier, but I was never warned for sock-puppetry. I was permanently banned staraight forward. I saw another case of User:Mughal Lohar. He was also found involved in sock-puppetry, but he was blocked for just one day. (See: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Mughal_Lohar#Blocked) Then why was I blocked permanently?
Why did I create more accounts ?
[edit]When I was banned first time for sock-puppetry, I decided that I will not make more accounts. But continuous vandalism by some members like User:Mughal Lohar and incompleteness of some wikipidea articles forced me to make further accounts. Again I apologise for that. But when I tried to defend me on talk page, my talk page was also blocked.
Once, when I was banned for my edits in Aurangzeb article. I was banned by an adminstrator and my edits in Aurangzeb were reverted with a message "Reverted edits by sock-puppet".
However an admin- User:Dougweller later on found that my edits were quite neutral, while those of User:Mughal Lohar were full of vandalism. So Dougweller reverted edits by Mughal Lohar. But after a few days, Mughal Lohar came back and started editting the article again. Later on, he was banned. But his edits were not reverted.
I challenge the neutrality of Aurangzeb again. Please see the history of the page - http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Aurangzeb&action=history .
Why IP address has been blocked ??
[edit]I edit wikipidea articles from an internet cafe in which there are 25 computers. The admin has blocked the entire range of IP address, thereby blocking the entire internet cafe. However apart from me, there are other people who edit wiki articles from the cafe. Please visit this page, here is a list of acounts which have been blocked claiming that they are sock-puppets of mine : (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Iamtrhino).
I admit that most of them were mine sock-puppets. But 3 of those profiles were not mine and they got blocked because of me. Those three are : User:RahmanImti, User:Rohit jassi and User:MichaelSchelles. These three were not mine. I didn't create them. But still they got blocked most likely because they too were created/used from the same internet cafe.
So I request the admins to unblock the range of IP address, so that other users can edit wikipidea articles.
Unblock request
[edit]I am extremely sorry for using multiple accounts. But now I am aware of all the rules of the Wikipidea. So I further request the admins to unblock the IP address along with one of my account User:Parvesh13 (my real name is Parvesh Kaushik), so that I too can contribute to this great world of wikipidea. I promise that :
- I will never make/use more accounts and remain a 'one-account man'.
- I will never be involved in any kind of vandalism and try my best to maintain the neutrality of the articles. Whenever there will be any edit conflict, I will solve the issue on talk page.
I request you to give me this last chance.
Parvesh13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Earlier in my initial phase, I was unaware of the sockpuppet rules of wikipidea. Without any warning I was permanently banned. So , I decided not to create more accounts. But vandalism by some other members forced me to make other accounts. I apologize for that. When I tried to convey my message to admins, my talk page was also blocked. But now I am aware of all the rules. I request admins to unblock the blocked IP address 1.23...... and my account Parvesh13. I give an undertaking that I will not any break any rule of wikipidea. I will not make any more account. Whenever there will be an edit conflict, I will solve it first on talk page (earlier I was unaware of talk page rule). I have given rest explanation on my talk page. I request admins to give me this last chance. I shall be thankful to you.
Decline reason:
I see no need to unblock any IP address, any other users caught in that block can request their own unblock at their own talk page. As for this username, It's normal to request unblock from the "main" user name, not from some recently made sock - looking at the SPI investigation, that would suggest User:Mrpontiac1 - it's possible that you could ask for the Wikipedia:Standard offer, but I don't know if you would get community agreement, with such a prolific socking history. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:50, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Parvesh13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sir, I request you to reconsider it. I had the problem, which probably most members have in their initial days of wikipidea editing. I was unaware of the rules regarding sock-puppetry. But I got no warning for that and banned straight forward. It takes time to learn something. Thats why unknowingly I violated the sck-puppetry rules of wikipidea. I aplogise for that. However, now I ensure that I am aware of all the rules now. I am giving an undertaking that I will not violate any rules of wikipidea regarding sock-puppetry or anything else.
Decline reason:
According to the various investigations of your sock, there are close to 100 accounts and 200+ IP socks. You are now ranged blocked which is why you keep coming back here. You need to go back to your original account and request unblock from there, keep trying here will not work and will get this page blocked as well. Ronhjones (Talk) 14:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Parvesh13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Quote: "According to the various investigations of your sock, there are close to 100 accounts and 200+ IP socks."
Reply : Sir, I don't have 100+ accounts and 200+ socks as being claimed. I am the owner of Iamtrhino socks only, the name of my accounts are given in this list : (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Iamtrhino). However, out of accounts which are mentioned in this list, three are not mine. These three are : User:RahmanImti, User:Rohit jassi and User:MichaelSchelles.
But I can't understand why I am being related to sock-puppet accounts of User:Mrpontiac1 ? I am not the owner of User:Mrpontiac1's accounts. I request the admins to investigate the sock-puppetry case of User:Mrpontiac1 again. And I am sure that you will come to the right conclusion that the owners User:Iamtrhino and User:Mrpontiac1 are different, not same. They can't be inter-related.
Decline reason:
Not an unblock request. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Whether you are User:Iamtrhino and/or User:Mrpontiac1 is not for debate here. This is still just a sock and not a place to request unblock - time to stop this nonsense. Ronhjones (Talk) 20:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)