User talk:Parminder Sarwara

Welcome!

Hello, Parminder Sarwara, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Raja Babu (film) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tum Bin, you may be blocked from editing. Tolly 4 bolly 09:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding {{INRConvert}} to infoboxes, please

Please stop adding INRConvert templates to infoboxes,[1][2][3][4] (etc.) please. Per longstanding consensus at WT:ICTF, we don't do this anymore. That's been the standard for like 3 years. Also, please stop arbitrarily changing million to crore. Per WP:COMMONALITY, the community prefers that numbers be indicated in millions. I personally prefer using crore, but if millions are already there, don't change it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And don't fabricate data either, as you did here and here, etc. All content needs to be sourced. And no, bestoftheyear.in is not suitable. Stick to mainstream sources, not blogs or other garbage sites. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Fabricating content is a very quick way to wind up no longer welcome to edit at Wikipedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And this is indistinguishable from vandalism, since the reference says 17 crore, not 21 as you claim. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked not only for continuing to use the INRConvert template in the infobox contrary to community preferences, but also for fabricating financial figures. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello! I'm Arjayay. Your recent edit(s) to the page Ghayal: Once Again appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sam Worthington, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 16:00, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand what exactly I did wrong. I had improved the readability of the information on Sam Worthington's page by writing more coherently consistent sentences. I also improved the manner in which the paragraphs were structured. I felt that the information available on the site on Sam Worthington i

is far too limited. The current information does not include the box office success Worthington enjoyed during and post the success of Avatar (2009). It also doesn't haenough ny information on his work from 2013 to 20 1. Moreover, it lacks information of his involvement in Avatar So as a result, 2 had updated the page. I. I think Worthington's page needs to be updated and I request that the changes I made must be reverted back. Please feel free to offer any feedback. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 16:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think my internet disconnected as I was writing this reply so there are some mistakes. But I hope you can understand the points I'm making. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Parminder Sarwara, I'll try to reply in detail tomorrow. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 02:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bro you forgot to respond I think. Either respond to me in 2-3 days or I'm editing Sam Worthington's page. Don't undo my changes if you aren't going to provide me any reasons for why you disagree with my edits. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 09:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When updating gross box office receipts ...

Hi @Parminder Sarwara. I am @Archer1234. I noticed your recent edit to Bobby Deol where you updated the gross box office receipts for Animal.

Thank you for that update. However, please remember to update the |date= and |access-date= parameters of the citation when you update the value of the gross receipts. I have done that for you here. Thank you. Happy editing. — Archer (t·c) 14:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ayo, thanks man Parminder Sarwara (talk) 17:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Sunny Deol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anil Sharma. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Salman Khan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did add a reliable source at the end from "Box Office India". BOI is the most cited source of commercial success of Indian films on Wikipedia. The source I cited lists entire filmography of Khan from start to finish and their performances. In the future, don't remove content without reading proof reading the source. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is WP:SYNTH to perform that sort of analysis (it's even uncertain whether declaring decades to be the article-sections is itself WP:OR or editorializing). Another editor had already objected to it, so your reinsertion is the fundamental problem...need to discuss and get consensus rather than the appearance of starting an edit-war. DMacks (talk) 03:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, let's discuss it. How is that WP:SYNTH? The source I cited literally mentions the words, hit, flop, average etc. Since the article specifically states that information, it's not WP:SYNTH. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 03:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are using the raw data to make an analysis. Obviously there were lots of films that had poor financial and/or critical results, and a few that did well. But who are we to say that overall this was the lowest phase? Couldn't one or two successes be considered more important than lots of non-successes? It might or might not be true, but that's why we need a reliable source to draw any conclusion. Obviously there were some good and some bad in the 2000–2010 range. But again, who are we to demarcate this as the range of the "fluctuations" (weren't there already two flops in 1999?). DMacks (talk) 06:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Ravensfire, who undid your edit the first time you made it (and I see has similar concerns). DMacks (talk) 06:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Parminder Sarwara, I will second all of those concerns from DMacks and I will also point out that just as before, you're starting to edit-war over this and not discussing your edits. Your revert of mine was NOT a minor edit, so you wrongly used that option. You're making edits that are poor writing and are NOT supported by the sources. This must stop. In this case, as I said, you need to have a source that explicitly makes the statements in your edit. Here's an easy hint that you completely skipped in your comment here - NOTHING in the source covers the critical response. Nothing. As DMacks said, you need a source that is doing that analysis, not you taking data points and drawing your own conclusion. That is textbook WP:SYNTH. Ravensfire (talk) 13:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buddy you had no problems undoing my edits without discussion, why am I obliged to start a discussion with you if I wanna undo your edits. What goes around comes around. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding uncited analysis is not acceptable. That was explained in the WP:ES. WP:ONUS is on you to get a ref, therefore it is acceptable to remove uncited content. I would not recommend going down the path you seem to be starting. WP:POINT, WP:HOUNDING, and general threats will quickly lead to you being blocked altogether. I can tell by your talkpage you have a history of not behaving collaboratively and in keeping with our behavioral and content standards. DMacks (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You said I need sources to back up the lowest phase claim, so once I find the source, it's logical that I post my edit back on Khan's page with citation. Isn't that what you asked for?

So what do you want me to do now? Find a source and be like "Hey DMack, look I found a source!" They you're going to read the source and give me a thumbs up? I'm not being sarcastic, I'm genuinely asking.

And how can you block me? Are you a rank above me? What is my rank? Parminder Sarwara (talk) 03:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's called WP:BRD - you Boldly make a change, but when it's Reverted, you need to start the Discussion. Ravensfire (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So the problem you have is with the sentence stating "lowest phase", you could have asked for citation rather than deleting it. I'll find sources about it and repost my edit with the source. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Your recent editing history at Ranveer Singh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not engaged in an edit war, "WE" are engaged in an edit war. Have some accountability. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 09:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is your big plan here? You deleted our discussion from your page when you felt cornered and now you're sending a pre-written warning? I have already explained this to you that RS is not an established actor and thus far you have not provided a single counterargument. I am not going to just forget about this. So how about it we discuss it and reach a conclusion? Parminder Sarwara (talk) 09:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Dwayne Johnson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tune bhi to wahi Kiya. Dusre karein to tujhe problem hai, tu kare to sab changa hai. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 10:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Dwayne Johnson. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Czello ^(music) 11:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok dude. I tried to keep it professional but this Krimuk has a history of being difficult. But alright fine, I won't do it again. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 11:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss at Talk:Dwayne_Johnson#Section_heading. Ravensfire (talk) 13:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Antony Starr, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:35, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn basic MoS such as WP:PORTRAIT and WP:ENDASH instead of learning only to use the revert button. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. Thank you for your recent contributions to Vatsal Sheth. I noticed that you added an image to the article's infobox as a thumbnail. In future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox, as this is against the Manual of Style. When adding an image, supply only the filename to the |image= parameter and the caption to the |caption= parameter instead. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using; please consult the Template page for the infobox being used on that page for proper instructions and documentation. Thanks! - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 06:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shit happens. Glad you fixed it. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 09:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]