User talk:ParisClementine

February 2018

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Eric Joyce. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Nahum Manbar, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. reddogsix (talk) 15:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

These clearly malicious attacks on Aspect Consulting, a minor PR and lobbying firm, need to stop. The additions made to the two articles above are not generally newsworthy, especially when it comes to the career of someone's son. However, I have only reverted some of your edits, and kept some of the information on work while putting it in a more neutral tone. ParisClementine (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Nahum Manbar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 17:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

I have also expressed my views in the talk page that the career of Nahum Manbar's son is not relevant, and that if it needs to be mentioned at all, it should be done in a far more neutral fashion.

I hope that this will now be heeded. ParisClementine (talk) 17:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, ParisClementine. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Aspect Consulting, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 17:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

I have no conflict of interest. ParisClementine (talk) 17:46, 12 February 2018 (UTC)