User talk:ParanakanDoctor

Just another sock. I'm having trouble finding the report because the last account, RuyiAstroDome (talk · contribs) wasn't even notified. --Ronz (talk) 02:44, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is not true

That is not true and I am offended. Please recantParanakanDoctor (talk) 06:23, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Reactive attachment disorder, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 06:30, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Child abuse, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 06:54, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ParanakanDoctor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I added material that is in compliance with wikipedia policy since it was referenced and from a reliable source. I am not a sock and resent the accusation. After you removed my materials I put a note on your talk page asking for the specific policy you think I violated, and in response you've blocked me. I am a supporter of the trt in question and trained in its use and so wanted to add, what seemed relevant tot he relevant articles. What I added is from a reliable source: published books from reputable publishers by authors who have published in professional venues. This is my first time posting...I am not a sock and felt, as I said in my note on your talk page, that you'd acted in an insulting and disparaging manner. ParanakanDoctor (talk) 00:15, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're making the exact same edits as another account, and I see enough similarities between the two to discount that as a possible coincidence. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:51, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ParanakanDoctor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, my edit is the same because I agree with the edit and, as I stated, believe it was, and mine is, consistent with the wikipedia policy regarding the addition of referenced material using reliable sources. I practice DDP and do not agree what the material deleted is an advert. ParanakanDoctor (talk) 06:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The relationship between accounts has been checked at a technical level. At this point, the contents of the edit matter little. What are the odds that someone else using the exact same computer from the exact same IP address would make the exact same edit? It's either WP:SOCK or WP:MEAT, and neither is good (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that this is a Checkuser-confirmed case of sockpuppetry. Admins generally won't overturn such blocks. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 10:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]