User talk:Paradise Chronicle/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Paradise Chronicle. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Did you revert the edit you intended to?
You recently (July 16) reverted an edit to the article on the Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic with the comment "take it to the talk page." I think you may have intended to revert the edit before the one you actually reverted, in which an anonymous editor changed sourced material. The edit you reverted was a second edit by the same editor, removing a fragment left behind by an editing error; that editor's original change remains in the article, unreverted. UrielAcosta (talk) 22:36, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- I guess this was an undo I made after it very likely triggered the red color on my watchlist. It is a GA and red colors and GA don't go well together. But it was no obvious vandalism, so I performed an undo. Apparently this was wrong and now I self-reverted. Thanks for the notice. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:58, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Burns & McDonnell
On 23 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Burns & McDonnell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the engineering and architectural company Burns & McDonnell is 100% owned by its employees? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Burns & McDonnell. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Burns & McDonnell), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 02:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Judith Stamm
On 23 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Judith Stamm, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 17:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Beccaynr (talk) 15:04, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Female (gender). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please continue using the Talk page instead of continuing to mass-delete sourced content. This article is currently subject to an AfD. Thanks, Beccaynr (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- You want to have included something that can be written on any human being that sees a psychologist and portray female gender roles associated with conflict and psychological stress and per the phrase only psychological stress and conflict. And I am not the only one who complains about that phrase. Other issues are there as well. If there are so many sources you claim there are bring them, expand the article with something meaningful, we as Wikipedians all wish you success.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:12, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Regarding the article Turkish capture of Smyrna
Hey! You had argued that the new edit in the article Turkish capture of Smyrna needs more NPOV. How so? Let's talk here and make amends in the article if necessary. I am neutral, so I would like to hear your opinion. Thanks. zenzyyx_ (talk) 21:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- I meant that I worded it a bit more NPOV not that it needed more NPOV. I am not so much into this but I saw that sourced content was replaced by unsourced which I thought was not really fair.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:48, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Paradise Chronicle Oh, okay. Thanks for NPOV'ing the article a bit further. zenzyyx_ (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Katja Husen
On 1 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Katja Husen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Katja Husen was the speaker of the Green Youth, a member of the Hamburg Parliament, and the CEO of the Centre for Molecular Neurobiology Hamburg? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Katja Husen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Katja Husen), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Prosantosaurus
On 2 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Prosantosaurus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that skeletons of a Triassic marine reptile were discovered at an altitude of about 2,700 metres (8,900 ft) above sea level? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Prosantosaurus. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Prosantosaurus), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
IRP advisory
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1978 Iranian politics. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- LouisAragon (talk) 23:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- You are fast, thanks for the note, LouisAragon Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurdistan (newspaper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marwanids.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
Hi Paradise Chronicle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
New page reviewer granted
Hi Paradise Chronicle. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 22:05, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for the trust. Was really interesting going through the new pages feed the minutes before I answered to your approval of my request.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:33, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Winifred Brown
On 30 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Winifred Brown, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Winifred Brown (pictured) arrived for the King's Cup air race in 1930, she was not allowed to stay at the aero club but still won the race? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Winifred Brown. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Winifred Brown), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Josef Martin Knüsel
On 4 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Josef Martin Knüsel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after the Swiss federal councilor Josef Martin Knüsel lost a complimentary election to the National Council in 1875, he resigned? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Josef Martin Knüsel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Josef Martin Knüsel), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Complimentary election
On 4 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Complimentary election, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after the Swiss federal councilor Josef Martin Knüsel lost a complimentary election to the National Council in 1875, he resigned? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Josef Martin Knüsel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Complimentary election), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Mehmet Şerif Fırat
On 7 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mehmet Şerif Fırat, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after Mehmet Şerif Fırat helped the Turkish military defeat the Sheikh Said rebellion, he was internally exiled with relatives of the leaders of the rebellion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mehmet Şerif Fırat. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mehmet Şerif Fırat), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Javier Marías
On 13 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Javier Marías, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 12:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Margrith Bigler-Eggenberger
On 13 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Margrith Bigler-Eggenberger, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 13:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Hi Paradise Chronicle. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. -- Amanda (she/her) 05:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Fresh NPP Reviewer of the month
|
New Reviewer Award | |
| For being the top article reviewer for September, among the new reviewers. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
P.S. If you are interested the annual awards that are given out for NPP, please take a look at WP:NPPA. -MPGuy2824 (talk) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Join the NPP Discord!
Hey @Paradise Chronicle, a bunch of us from NPP have a Discord server where we talk about NPP and bounce ideas off each other. You should come by and say hi! [1]. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 08:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Page reviwer?
Hi again, remember me? That DYK guy. I noticed that you have page reviewer right. I created an article about a film. The film will be released in this month and people will search the film for information. I know that I should have patience, but can you review the page? I requested you because soon the film will be talk of the town. That's why. Mehedi Abedin 17:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Of course I remember you. Don't worry, which one was it? If I feel comfortable with it, I'll do it.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
@Paradise Chronicle: Sorry to disturb you. Just now someone reviewed the article. Happy editing. Mehedi Abedin 20:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey, thanks for your message to support my RPP at Turkish war of independence. Best.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 17:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Early end of the backlog drive
A few days ago, new page patrollers got the backlog to zero. Due to the unprecedented success of the backlog drive, it will be ending early—at the end of 24 October, or in approximately two hours.
Barnstars will be awarded as soon as the coords can tally the results. Streak awards will be allocated based on the first three weeks of the drive, with the last three days being counted as part of week three.
Great work everyone! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Rating for On Guard for Peace
Thank you for reviewing the article. I'm confused by your rating. Comparing it with the examples cited here, it seems as if it ought to be rated at least a B-class or even higher. Everything is sourced and cited properly, there is no OR; the article goes into depth about the work’s creation and premiere, as well as its historical background, which explains why it was composed, and reception. There are also a number of images that illustrate figures crucial in the work’s creation and reception. Aside from providing the oratorio's text with translation and descriptions of each movement with musical examples (which I do not know how to make), I am not sure how else this article could be improved.
I would very much appreciate your insight here. If you could tell me what else this article is lacking, that would also be welcome. Thank you again. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 14:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- @CurryTime7-24 Please do not see this as a something personal, I hardly ever rate an article for a B as I normally guess there is more info on the subject. Feel free to upgrade it if you like. Until B one can decide for oneself. The article is really in good shape and your comment is also rather confident. I suggest you review it once more by yourself, fix the eventual typos etc. send it to the WP:GOCE and then nominate it for a Good Article/GA.
- Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your kind reply! —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 18:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
NPP Backlog Drive Awards
|
The Reviewer Barnstar | |
| This award is given to Paradise Chronicle for collecting more than 50 points doing reviews and re-reviews, in the October NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 09:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
Worm Gear Award | |
| This award is given to Paradise Chronicle for collecting more than 7 points per week doing reviews, in the October NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you for your contributions Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 09:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC) |
DYK for Şebnem Korur Fincancı
On 4 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Şebnem Korur Fincancı, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Şebnem Korur Fincancı, a drafter of a United Nations guideline on the documentation of torture, was arrested after she suggested an investigation into the use of chemical weapons? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Şebnem Korur Fincancı. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Şebnem Korur Fincancı), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Hi Paradise Chronicle. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. ~Swarm~ {sting} 16:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Disruptive editing
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gara massacre, you may be blocked from editing.
Disambiguation link notification for April 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–2023 Peoples' Democratic Party closure case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tagesschau.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Olympics AFDs
Hi Paradise Chronicle!
Thanks for much for addressing some of the many Olympic stubs on Wikipedia by starting deletion discussions. Did you know that many of these articles can be boldly redirected by you without the need for a deletion discussion?
When a non-notable Olympian only competed in one event, you can simply redirect their page to that event. It's easy and saves time for everyone, just follow the instructions in Wikipedia:Redirect.
If an Olympian competed in multiple events, AFD or PROD is suitable.
Thanks! MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 18:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks you for the heads up. Where is the discussion where this was agreed on? I didn't see anything that this can be done with Olympics at WP:Redirect. Also, what about if one competed in multiple (100m 200m, 400m) events but only one Olympic Games? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Redirecting articles is a commonly accepted alternative to deletion. You can redirect anything that lacks notability to a page where the subject is mentioned. Someone may revert and start a discussion, but in my experience this rarely happens with minor Olympians.
- There's no policy saying you have to redirect instead of sending to AfD. I mention it because the four Lugnuts Olympic stubs you nominated for deletion in the past week are heading for redirects as opposed to outright deletion.
- If an Olympian was at multiple events at one Olympic games, there may be another appropriate redirect target. For example, if a Brazilian Olympian competed in multiple athletics disciplines at the 2020 Olympics, you could redirect to Brazil at the 2020 Summer Olympics#Athletics.
- But if there's no good redirect target, or lots of options with no clear standouts, an AfD or PROD would likely be suitable. Thanks! MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 09:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Ahmad Jamal
On 20 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ahmad Jamal, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 03:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- For Ahmad Jamal, I don't believe to deserve one, but for Elisabeth Kopp, (
who'd eachWoh's death was known on the 14th April) I would have deserved one.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
--176.219.153.254 (talk) 08:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
God Jul!
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Paradise Chronicle: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:44, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
,_cropped.jpg)
Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:44, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
|
Happy Holidays | |
| Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 17:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC) |
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello Paradise Chronicle,
- Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
- 2022 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022
Hello Paradise Chronicle,
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.
Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.
Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.
Suggestions:
- There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
- Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
- Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
- This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.
Backlog:
Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging