User talk:Panguirus

For heaven's SAKES Moronator, GO AWAY for Wikipedia sakes!! How do you KNOW there is a Thylacine or a Mammoth in Extinct Animals? Post proof, OTHER than "IT'S IN THE VIDEO AND I SAY SO!! HU-WHA!! HU-WHA!!"

First of all, someone said that now we know that the Tasmanian tiger was in the video, *Secondly, the wooly mammoth is in the box art check out his and the mastodon's tusks, they are not the same, the mammoth has very long and curly ones and the mastodon have straight one, I checked
Thridly, if the two dinosaurs from Dino Danger are in EA, then the other two dinos should be in it too

Last but not least, someone said there is a gastornis and quagga in the screenshots outside wikipedia. in Zoo tycoon.nl. Panguirus 02:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's pure, dumb original research. Dora Nichov 12:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Those "Some people" is really ONE person...you. You have NO proof that there is a Mammoth in the game, and you won't do for a long time. You have obviously never seen a Mastodon, and your comment only says "IT IS A MAMMOTH BECAUSE I SAY SO!! HU-WHA!! HU-WHA!!" So shut up and go away Moronator CBFan 14:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NEVER! Panguirus 01:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then you will obviously be banned, and have your IP blocked, because you are clearly a vandal. 212.219.92.36 08:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And a sockpuppet. Dora Nichov 09:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also heard that there will be a unicorn. Panguirus 02:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, don't be so STUPID!! Of course there won't be a unicorn! That doesn't even exist! 212.219.92.36 08:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really, Then check this [Website] I found and don't you dare remove it.

Your empty comments mean nothing to me. Besides, the website doesn't exist. A mythical animal would NOT be in an Extinct animal expansion. 212.219.92.36 14:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about the giant unicorn (Or should I say a "Elasmotherium"). Panguirus 09:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not A unicorn. It's a Rhinoceros. And there's no immediate proof of that either. 212.219.92.36 09:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's a woolly rhinoceros. Dora Nichov 09:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But they called it by a common name "Giant Unicorn". That is what said on wikipedia

Well, just 'cause it's called a unicorn, does that make it one? Dora Nichov 10:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EA[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Zoo Tycoon 2: Extinct Animals page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Cuddly Panda 08:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Animal Face-Off, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. And sorry if I'm wrong, but I believe you're actually Snakezilla... Dora Nichov 12:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Animal Face-Off, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dora Nichov 09:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Vandalising the page, I'm just making it more sense by changing "Tiger vs Brown bear" to "Siberian tiger vs Grizzly bear". I will make more sense and that is the title of it on television. Panguirus 13:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's only HALF of what you're doing...in fact, barely a quarter. Whenever I see you editing a page, you remove the species name from all of them (so some of them, such as Sperm Whale vs Collosal Squid, don't make sense...after all, it could be a Blue Whale against your common ocean squid), add species names for all of them (it does not specify an Indian Lion and Bengal Tiger, but it DOES specify an African Elephant and a White Rhinoceros), or completely vandalise the Sperm Whale vs Collosal Squid location, either saying "Any ocean" or "Anywhere but Antarctica" (when the show, quite clearly, sets the fight in the Antarctic ocean. And I know because I've seen it). 80.47.239.24 17:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning.[edit]

Do not make illegitimate threats to have someone blocked. I cannot be blocked for redirecting a cartoon character - I'm doing better for Wikipedia simply by the fact that you continue this edit war by reverting without any reason besides you like it. - A Link to the Past (talk) 13:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But Fred Fredburger DESERVES AN ARTICLE. He's my favourite character, he must have one. you know me and the other ones I am hate loosing fred's article. Panguirus 01:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just because YOU want him, doesn't mean he HAS to have one. Being one person's favourite character does NOT warrent having an article. YOU should know that by now, so stop vandalising Komodo Lover. 212.219.92.36 08:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Fram 11:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fram 11:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I thought that no one has the ability to block someone forever. Anyway You what to why there will be a mammoth well I'll show you.
1. I saw a picture of a Mammoth and Mastodon and there is a difference, the Mammoth has very curved tusks and is very wooly and the mastodon has straight tusks and is totally hairless.
2. The fossils of the mastodon were found in egypt and the mammoth's were in europe.
3. If the mammoth skeleton statue is in the video then the mammoth should be in the game.
4. A question told me that the mammoth and mastodon are not the same. the anwser said that they are different animals. And another thing, what's the point of having Extinct animals without the Mammoth? Panguirus 08:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-1: Nope, you're telling lies to get your way. Everyone knows that Mastodons are just as hairy as Mammoths. The 'pictures' of the two were obviously ones you drew and altered, and are historically incorrect as a result.

2: Again, you're telling lies. Mastodons have been found in North America.
3: Who says that the skeleton/statue is definately a Mammoth?
4: ...OK, that makes no sense whatsoever. You just made up that pathetic excuse. Yes, I know it SHOULD have a Mammoth, but you have no proof. CBFan 15:19, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely! Dora Nichov 02:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's telling the truth, he did not draw it, he bought the book and the drawring was by a profeshinal not by him, You are the fibbers, YOU ARE THE UNTRUE TELLERS, YOU ARE ALL LIERS, PANGUIRUS IS THE TRUTH TELLER, HE FOUND THE INFO ABOUT THE MASTODON AND HE IS THE TRUTH TELLER AND YOU ARE ALL LIERS. 58.71.169.163 03:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop lying. YOU'RE Panguirus. And I'm a big ZT2 fan, if there's a mammoth I would have heard of it long ago. Dora Nichov 03:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are Right, the American Nipped tooth and the wooly elephant are both hairy and have the same ears and tails but when I went to search for a picture of the mastodon on google, I saw two differences, before I tell you, are the Mammoth and Mastodon the same size? Panguirus 08:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still not really a good enough indication. 212.219.92.36 09:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you don't even have proof the EA elephantid is a mammoth. But we know there will be a mastodon, so it's more likely a mastodon. Dora Nichov 09:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know but is the mastodon the same size as the mammoth. Panguirus 09:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So? It's still more likely a mastodon. Dora Nichov 10:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How many times do I have to repeat this, Say either "Yes" or "No". Panguirus 16:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's the point of answering the question? It won't prove anything. Especially as we've not got anything to compare it with. CBFan 20:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, just because they're the same size... does that prove anything? Dora Nichov 00:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to know because I'm not good at size checking. Panguirus 04:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]