User talk:Panfakes

Welcome!

Hello, Panfakes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ShadowHalo 11:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

I've updated the userbox on your userpage. I'm offering adoption. V60 ^{VTalk · VDemolitions} 15:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion tagging

Hi! When tagging a page for deletion, don't blank it (as you did with "baby punting") - just add the appropriate tag to the top of the page. Thanks, 14:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

When getting rid of a mistake article such as You dont speak for me, do not use AfD - just tag it {{db-author}}. -- RHaworth 16:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SmackBot

The SmackBot added a link to a global warming site in this article about Internet marketing: [1]. Am I missing something? Panfakes 17:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes two things:

The site relates to a SEO competition.
I (SB) did not add it.

Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 11:45 12 April 2007 (GMT).

Your edits to Pensacola Christian College

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Pensacola Christian College. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kralizec! (talk) 17:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your message [2] on my talk page, this article has been vandalized a lot in the past, especially by current and former PCC students who often remove information from the article which they feel is unflattering to the college. As such, myself and several others normally revert on sight any multi-sentence deletions that do not have edit summaries.

While I do not necessarily have any objections per se with the deletion of the material in question, Wikipedia's WP:CITE guideline indicates that "attribution is required for direct quotes and for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged. Any material that is challenged and for which no source is provided may be removed by any editor." Additionally, the official WP:VERIFY policy states that "any edit lacking a source may be removed, but editors may object if you remove material without giving them a chance to provide references. If you want to request a source for an unsourced statement, consider moving it to the talk page. Alternatively, you may tag the sentence by adding the {{fact}} template, or tag the article by adding {{not verified}} or {{unsourced}}. Leave a note on the talk page or edit summary explaining what you have done." As contentious as edits to this article have been in the past, I would recommend that rather than just deleting the paragraph again, you instead consider tagging each of the questionable sentences with any combination of templates from WP:CTT. --Kralizec! (talk) 17:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Malaspina University-College; Johnson Bible College; Hebrew Union College; Great Cornard Upper School; Vondie Curtis-Hall; Operation C; Kimora Lee Simmons; Free Will Baptist Bible College; Andong Institute of Information Technology; Association of Theological Schools in the United States and Canada; Northern Illinois University; Marymount High School; The Association for Biblical Higher Education; Crown College (Minnesota); Eastern New Mexico University; Ogilvie Institute; Youth Day; Texas State University System; Wesley Institute

Cleanup: Tata Institute of Fundamental Research; University of Shanghai for Science and Technology; Never Gone
Merge: Pat Miletich; Chitpavan; Stabilizing selection
Add Sources: Dirrty; Brian Littrell; List of unrecognized accreditation associations of higher learning
Wikify: Northwest Writing Institute; Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences; Howard High School
Expand: East Central University; Oregon State Board of Higher Education; Project64

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: KLSX

That's the thing, I didn't change the link into the stars. Seems the internet I'm using at home must've have parental controls I didn't know about. It detects a link unsuitable for kids and censors it automatically and there was nothing I can do about it to bypass.

My apologies if that's the case. All I was doing is adding the sister stations to the KLSX infobox. Mbrstooge 15:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On ritalin zombies.

This is definitely a notable claim, simply googling it would've shown you that. Just because it isn't a popular subject with a lot of reliable sources does not make it untrue. I can probably find even more sources, but the point is, the content IS reliable and widespread enough enough for inclusion --lucid 16:09, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]