User talk:Pandit Sudarshan Das (Tablalahara)

Speedy deletion nomination of "Learn To Play Tabla"

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on "Learn To Play Tabla", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 04:08, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Learn To Play Tabla with Singing & Instruments"

Hello Pandit Sudarshan Das (Tablalahara),

It seems to me that an article you worked on, "Learn To Play Tabla with Singing & Instruments", may be copied from http://www.tablalahara.co.uk/page13.php. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 04:27, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Learn To Play Tabla"

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on "Learn To Play Tabla", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Pandit Sudarshan Das (Tablalahara)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Pandit Sudarshan Das (Tablalahara), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. From your contributions, it seems this is your only purpose here, but Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion of any kind. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 09:26, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi john could you answer me.. i mistake because its my first time wikidepia Hi john you should answer me? can you here me joohn answer me to questions? could you please re-open for me

Please add new messages at the bottom of this page, to keep the conversation in order. I have moved your messages down.

The block notice explains what to do if you want to be unblocked:

Read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks
Make an unblock request by writing

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of this page, replacing "Your reason here" by the reason why you should be unblocked. Another administrator will consider it.

You need to say what sort of edits you would make if unblocked. If what you want to do is write about yourself and advertise your DVDs, you will not be unblocked, because that is not what an encyclopedia is for. JohnCD (talk) 10:26, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

john help me please

Read the message just above this. It tells you what to do if you want to be unblocked. No one can help you if you do not read the advice you are given. JohnCD (talk) 10:35, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How to request unblock

Your request simply said "unblock" but did not give any reason, and included "nowiki" tags which meant that it did not display correctly.

Do not include "nowiki" tags. Copy off this page, not from the page you see after "edit source":

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

Paste that at the bottom of this page. Then replace the words "Your reason here" with the reason why you should be unblocked. Your reason needs to make clear that you understand why you were blocked, and explain what sort of edits you plan to make if you are unblocked. If you simply want to write about yourself and advertise your DVDs, this is not the site for you - you can do that at places like Myspace and Facebook, but not here. JohnCD (talk) 10:52, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason= sorry i didnot know the rules, now i understood wikepidia not adverstised site, sorry for that for the mistake, please un-block for me ~~~~}}

If you are unblocked, what are you going to edit? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:48, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pandit Sudarshan Das (Tablalahara) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hi NeilN i explained to you others message, please do for me favor and un-block to my profile, could you please read any previous e-mail.I am very dispointed , JohnCD has blocked my profiile, hope he re un-block again, could you please un block for me Thanks sorry i didnot know the rules, now i understood wikepidia not adverstised site, sorry for that for the mistake, please un-block for me, i do copy from my webstie- www.tablalahara.co.uk, hope you understood please un-block for me, i am very glad full to you Pandit Sudarshan Das 11:37 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Please only post one unblock request at a time; I have combined the text of your two requests. In response to both: I am declining your unblock request because it does not respond to the issue that has been repeatedly raised on this talkpage; namely: what are you going to edit if unblocked? If the answer is, as it appears to be, "copy from my website", then you will not be unblocked as this would constitute further self-promotion on your part. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pandit Sudarshan Das (Tablalahara) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hi johnCD you didnot lest any message, last night i has been replied to you several times and you didnot answer me, you send to me one message but it was empty, its very bed and you hang me the editing for Wikipedia, i am really disapointed about your notice and you are should paying, i complain against you wikepidia office, you re dis-respect for the customer and you didnot reply me any message- you doing with me very disapointed

Decline reason:

Nobody pays on Wikipedia. Also, nobody is allowed to advertise on Wikipedia, and I think that that is your only intention. When you are complaining about not getting a reply, please remember that we are volunteers and we have lives outside Wikipedia. I'm lucky being able to work at home quite a lot, and I can edit in between doing other things. Any administrator can answer here. You can complain about us if you wish, and if you can find out how (I can't help you there), but I don't think you'll get much joy. You see, we can't dis-respect the customer when we don't have customers. This is an encyclopaedia, not a directory. Peridon (talk) 21:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Recommend this user remain blocked per (sorry to say it) WP:CIR. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:50, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yet the articles looked comparatively competent (for what they were). He must be a good tabla player, but this isn't the place to promote his DVD etc. Peridon (talk) 21:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pandit Sudarshan Das, I did not see your messages last night because you blanked them yourself, for instance this message you blanked here. I have never received any emails from you. In any case I have explained to you, several times, that what you need to do is not complain to me but submit a proper unblock request saying what sort of edits you would make if you were unblocked: then a different admin will consider it, so that it is not just my opinion about your block.

When you make an unblock request, do not put "<tt>" and "<nowiki>" tags around it, or it will not show up; and please do put it at the bottom of the page. I have fixed your latest request and moved it down. JohnCD (talk) 23:24, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pandit Sudarshan Das (Tablalahara) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hi peridon, thanks sms but i never know here more problem, i do DVD advertised from my website so i am new use wikipedia, hope you understood but JohnCD he blocked my ip address its very bed he should un-blocked my profile and IP address Pandit Sudarshan Das (Tablalahara) (talk) 21:26, 3 December 2013‎

Decline reason:

I haven't any evidence so far that you intend to edit in compliance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. As well as that, at this stage I don't believe that you have the necessary skills to be able to effectively contribute to the English language Wikipedia, I echo JohnCD's suggestion that you look at the WP:List of Wikipedias and edit the one which is in your language. Also continually posting unblock requests is disruptive and will result in the removal of your ability to edit this talk page, please only post another request if it addresses the issues I've brought up in this decline statement as well as the original reason for your block. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sudarshan, you must answer the question you've been asked: What editing do you plan to do if you are unblocked? If you don't answer that question—satisfactorily—no administrator is going to unblock you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:07, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed some extra unblock requests, the following are the rationales from them:
- hi JohnCD hope you understood could you please un-block for me Pandit Sudarshan Das 03:41, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- hi JohnCD, thanks for your e-mail, i got your answer i don't want to advertised for DVD, because i was new here so i couldn't understood, but i want to wrote for article about music and history of music, i waiting for your un-block as soon as possible Pandit Sudarshan Das 03:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- hi Largo Plazo this reason i will edit for article about history of music they have reference, awarded also and i wrote to article for music, hope you understood, i taught administrator un-block for me Pandit Sudarshan Das 02:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Pandit Sudarshan Das please stop submitting unblock requests when there is still one waiting. You have been asked a question which you need to answer before your unblock request will be processed further. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note for reviewing admin: with regret I say that I think we have a competence issue here. The level of English in this user's replies, and his persistent inability to understand or unwillingness to comply with the simplest instructions, such as posting new messages at the bottom of this page, suggest to me that he is unlikely to be able to make constructive contributions here. JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, although I am interested to see the user's response to the question above. Though I am, at this stage, almost definitely intending to decline the unblock request on WP:CIR grounds. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pandit Sudarshan Das: it is clear that you are having difficulty in understanding messages and instructions here. This English-language Wikipedia is not the only one - see WP:List of Wikipedias - and the others all need contributors too. I suggest that you might be better able to contribute to a Wikipedia in your own language. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He did answer, though, in another failure to arrange things in an orderly fashion, he placed his response way up in the article from my restatement of the question. "hi Largo Plazo this reason i will edit for article about history of music they have reference, awarded also and i wrote to article for music, hope you understood ...." One might infer this to mean that he wants to contribute to articles about the history of music. However, I too think the WP:CIR barrier is too great, and even if he finally does get the point about not advertising himself and, apart from that, has useful knowledge for those articles, he won't be able to convey it effectively. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed talk page access

I have removed your ability to edit this talk page for attacking users and failing to get the point. If you wish to appeal the block, because you believe it is unfair or unnecessary any more, you can appeal using to unblock ticket request system or the ban appeals subcommittee. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]