User talk:Paknur

Speedy deletion nomination of Maryam Massoumi

A tag has been placed on Maryam Massoumi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 04:01, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality tag on Sindhi people

You placed a tag on the page, but haven't mentioned why you think the article is POV. Gamesmaster G-9 (talk) 16:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic Research Academy

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Islamic Research Academy, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.irak.pk/home.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why ?

Apart from Muslims other faiths also live in Pakistan...so why ?? How many images should be, and this church is in Islamabad and convincingly simple and elegant. Your arguments are not convincing.

Reshmi kabab

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Reshmi kabab, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://indianfood.about.com/od/chickendishes/r/reshmikabab.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic Research Academy

Islamic Research Academy has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process, where changes do not address the concerns for which the article was deleted. The earlier version of the article was deleted for failing to verify with reliable sources how it meets the notability guideline for organizations. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the article. Alternatively, if you wish to create a new article, please be sure to identify how the subject meets the notability guideline so that it will not be deleted again.

Also, I see that you have been cautioned by CorenSearchBot several times this month about pasting text onto Wikipedia from other sources. Please do not continue to do this. While Wikipedia appreciates all contributions, this is a matter that can put the project into legal jeopardy under the laws of the United States, where the Wikimedia Foundation is based. Contributors who paste material here after having warned about our copyright policy may be blocked from further contribution. While you obviously made an effort to remove copied text from Reshmi kabab, everything but the first sentence is still a direct paste from that copyrighted source. The article has been blanked to allow time to address this matter. I will place the "form letter" notification below so you can see the procedures for doing so. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Reshmi kabab

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Reshmi kabab, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://indianfood.about.com/od/chickendishes/r/reshmikabab.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Reshmi kabab and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ''under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later and Creative Commons Share Alike (CC-BY-SA), versions 3.0 or later, under CC-BY-SA, versions 3.0 or later, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Reshmi kabab with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, and note that you have done so on Talk:Reshmi kabab. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Reshmi kabab saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also needing processing in this way is the article Feudalism in Pakistan, which seems to be almost entirely duplicated from the article "Ethnicity and Conflict in India and Pakistan" from Contemporary Review, Vol. 282, March 2003. Islam in Adjara has also been blanked; information on the source is at the face of the article. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation, notice

The article Heat apoplexy has been deleted as a copyright violation under the speedy deletion policy, as it seems to have been entirely pasted. All of the language is present at [1] and [2]. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:13, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright block

You have been blocked from editing indefinitely in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to paste text from previously published sources into Wikipedia after having been warned not to do under this and other accounts. This conversation confirms that you have previously edited under other usernames which investigation shows to have violated our copyright policy, including Siddiqui (talk · contribs) where you were cautioned about this as far back as 2007, here. Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free text. In accordance with our copyright violations policy, this account may remain blocked until you are able to provide satisfactory assurances that infringement will not continue. If you believe this block is unjustified or to discuss a potential ublock, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you ?

You belong to which tribe.--Msnanda (talk) 16:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Shamsi (name)

Hello Paknur, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Shamsi (name), has been marked for speedy deletion by User:207.233.88.250. This has been done because the page was created in violation of a ban (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:207.233.88.250. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 207.233.88.250 (talk · contribs) 16:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ShalwarQameez.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ShalwarQameez.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — ξ ^xplicit 08:20, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:FShalwarQameez.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:FShalwarQameez.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — ξ ^xplicit 08:23, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamia Farida, Sahiwal

The article Jamia Farida, Sahiwal has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]