User talk:Paenigenome

Problems with upload of File:Vortex fig 2.tif

Thanks for uploading File:Vortex fig 2.tif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Paenibacillus fig 1.tif

Thanks for uploading File:Paenibacillus fig 1.tif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Paenibacillus genus1.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Paenibacillus genus1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Paenibacillus genus2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Paenibacillus genus2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For both of these images, given the information you have provided, you need to provide proof of copyright release through the WP:OTRS - all claims of "I have permission" or "it is ours" must be proven in this manner. Skier Dude (talk) 21:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Paenibacillus genus3.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Paenibacillus genus3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Paenibacillus. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 08:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Paenibacillus. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 13:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Paenigenome. You have new messages at Fæ's talk page.
Message added 14:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Paenibacillus images

The images File:Paenibacillus genus1.jpg and File:Paenibacillus genus2.jpg were deleted because there was no evidence that the license on the images was correct. The easiest way to provide this evidence is to follow the directions at Wikipedia:Contact us/Permit; someone should restore the images in a few days. --Carnildo (talk) 23:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:EshelBenJacob2011.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:EshelBenJacob2011.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:27, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bacterial art.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with File:Bacterial art.png

Hi Paenigenome, there's a permission problem with File:Bacterial art.png. Please follow the link for more information. —Granger (talk · contribs) 12:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Paenigenome. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 03:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Social IQ score of bacteria

The article Social IQ score of bacteria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The page appears to just restate what's in a single scientist's paper. All other references are tangential to the page topic. Searching on GScholar shows this term doesn't seem to have been adopted outside the Ben-Jacob lab. Topic is mentioned in some press releases from scientist's home university, but doesn't meet WP:GNG (not covered in independent sources).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajpolino (talk) 00:58, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ben-Jacob's bacteria

The article Ben-Jacob's bacteria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This term appears to be used in almost no sources, suggesting the topic doesn't meet WP:GNG. Appears to largely be promotion of the Ben-Jacobs lab. Useful info in this article on P. dendritiformis and P. vortex is already also at those articles. Term is only currently used in WP mirrors and in a smithsonian mag article (which is using the phrase as a regular possessive phrase, not as a term for these two species). Not used in any papers, suggesting if the term was ever used, it didn't catch on.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajpolino (talk) 01:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Social IQ score of bacteria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social IQ score of bacteria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social IQ score of bacteria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajpolino (talk) 04:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ben-Jacob's bacteria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben-Jacob's bacteria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben-Jacob's bacteria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajpolino (talk) 04:12, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]