User talk:Padma Award Editor and Creator

I have added many Padma Award Winners Name so please can you write articles on him 2401:4900:51D0:6877:55EB:F71D:3966:469A (talk) 04:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I will try

Hi Can you publish this article Draft:Brij Kishore Sharma "Tara" this article is of a Padma Shri winner. 2401:4900:51DD:73F9:A425:9904:AFF5:A56C (talk) 08:23, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shanti Jain moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shanti Jain, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nitesh003 (TALK) 09:09, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nitesh003 You know that what is Padma Shri and the page was cited by biggest newspapers from India

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Padma Award Editor and Creator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How I am the sockpuppet of that user do you have any proof Padma Award Editor and Creator (talk) 10:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your request doesn't address more directly the reasons for your block. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

@User:Yamla How can you say that I am sockpuppet do you have any proof. Padma Award Editor and Creator (talk) 11:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Review

@Daniel Case Use Check User to prove me that I am the blocked user.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Padma Award Editor and Creator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please use check user to prove me that I am really that blocked user or not Padma Award Editor and Creator (talk) 04:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't exactly a denial. 331dot (talk) 07:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Padma Award Editor and Creator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not that Blocked user Please see my check user details I don't know who is that blocked user. Please One Time use check user and I am the suspect Please prove me that I am confirmed that blocked user Please one time use Check User

Decline reason:

I suppose it was worth a try, on the off chance that your request might be reviewed by a stupid administrator, but it didn't work. Please stop wasting your time and ours with these attempts to use Wikipedia for promotion. Surely by now you must have got the message that it isn't going to work. JBW (talk) 14:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not that blocked user

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Padma Award Editor and Creator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am really not that blocked user and to prove me that I am not the blocked user please use Check User tool and I am only suspect not really confirmed sockpuppet by a check user details please use CHECK USER Padma Award Editor and Creator (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It is obvious that this block is justified, and that this is not going anywhere. Talk page access revoked. --Blablubbs (talk) 22:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Even if you aren't the same person, you have taken over the task of promoting the same person as they did, using numerous accounts, which is no better than the same person carrying on. I have actually seen enough evidence to persuade me that you are more likely than not the same person, though. Also, you have clearly addressed messages to yourself, to pretend to be several different people, and that is enough reason for a block, irrespective of whether you are the same person as the other accounts mentioned. As for asking for a CheckUser to exonerate you, they won't attempt to do that, for the simple reason that it is possible to take steps to avoid detection by CheckUser. JBW (talk) 21:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

--Blablubbs (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]