User talk:Padamind

This is Padamind's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello, Padamind, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 11:09, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Web4 (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Web4 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:09, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Padamind! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:09, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Web4 (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Web4 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:41, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Web4 (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This still seams more like web4.one promotion. Also this mixes up web4 and web4.0 which even Linkspreed/web4 say are different https://dev.to/web4/understanding-the-distinction-web4-vs-web40-c07 Lastly the article as a whole uses too much Linkspreed & web4.one as a source - -we require reliable sources that are independent of the topic

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Web4 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Padamind. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Web4, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 14:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Web4 (August 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sohom Datta was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Doing some research, nobody has yet agreed on what Web 4 actually is, there are some semi-scholarly publications that have put out papers floating concepts about how Web 4 is going to look, but there is no actual consensus on what it will look like or what it's components will be. Any attempt at defining it is effectively try to read a crystal ball into the future.

This article is aggressively pushing Linkspreed and web4.one's version of how such a future for Web4 ignoring all other viewpoint. It is effectively a persuasive essay which is also a thinly veiled marketing attempt. This is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If and when the concept of Web4 gains academic or mainstream consensus any good-faith editor is welcomed to submit a neutrally worded and reliably referenced draft for this topic area. For now, this submission is considered rejected.

Sohom (talk) 23:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sohom, sorry, but that is not the definition of a "free Wikipedia." I spent hours and hours working on a great article, adding many references and deep dives at the bottom. Every editor is warmly welcomed to contribute. Linkspreed and web4.one are two great projects at the forefront of the subject, contributing to the knowledge space. It's a shame that there isn't a real article on Wikipedia about Web4 (Web3 and Web2 are on Wikipedia). No worries, everyone is using ChatGPT because even AI delivers resources about the topic. I read articles, consulted experts, and wrote this article in my own words. It's a pity that AI is more free than Wikipedia. No wonder people don't want to contribute. You can't give me a single reason why my work was against the rules. I resubmitted it 4-5 times, always with new IEEE resources, all mentioning decentralization as the core of Web4. There is even a dedicated Web4 Medium section: https://web4.medium.com. Feel free to reply with the real reasons. Padamind (talk) 07:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]