User talk:Pacman464

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pacman464 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not linked to other accounts. Other people use this IP address but this is the only account I use.

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 18:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pacman464 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not used multiple accounts and yet it has been confirmed that I have. Just because other users have been using this IP address doesn't mean I am linked to them. All contributions I have made have been valid and I do not see how I am being linked to other accounts other than a shared IP address. Other than this there is no other link and I only have one account.

Decline reason:

That you would be innocently sharing an IP with a blocked user who has the words "Drwho" in their name while you are engaging in an edit edit war at he article on DR. Who is a few too many coincidences. It is far more reasonable to believe that you are in some way acting on behalf on the blocked user. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are using the same device and IP addresses as the other accounts I linked above and all of the accounts have been editing Doctor (Doctor Who), yet you expect us to believe that the accounts are unrelated?. —DoRD (talk) 18:41, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pacman464 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I realise acting on behalf of someone else was wrong but I am the only user with control of this account. I did not let the other user use my account although I admit to being influenced by what they told me. I will not do this in the future.

Decline reason:

Since we can't tell whether you are the same person or meatpuppets the end result is the same in that it is socking.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 21:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.