User talk:POM

Welcome!

Hello, POMBBC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as New Generation Artists, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 11:22, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of New Generation Artists

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on New Generation Artists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 11:22, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at New Generation Artists

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from New Generation Artists, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

What can I do now?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

POM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

POM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

The article is not for promotional purposes, as is claimed. It can't be, by definition, since the BBC is a public service broadcaster and has no commercial interests, sponsorships or promoters and is funded by the licence fee paid for by the British public. The information contained on the page BBC Radio 3 New Generation Artists scheme is public interest and it is impossible for the BBC to profit in any way from this page or any other page on which they are mentioned. Indeed, there are full pages on both the BBC and Radio 3 in Wikipedia

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. –MuZemike 21:11, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is no defense. We regularly block accounts editing on behalf of governmental/nonprofit organizations under the same rationale. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 18:48, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I second the comment above, and before considering unblocking would like an indication of what POM stands for. I would add to the above that the sanctions against promotion here apply as much to non-profits and charities as to multi-nationals and online Viagra sellers. They also apply to promotion of routes to salvation, and places to picnic (usually not on the route to salvation...). As a Radio 3 listener, I am fully aware of the NGA scheme, by the way. Peridon (talk) 19:29, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The BBC is in competition with other radio stations - I would guess R3 would compete with ClassicFM or similar (not my music...). Improved listening figures could result in a change of funding for that station, so your claim it cannot be promotional by definition does not hold water. I am always reluctant to unblock when there is a similar chunk of name. Is POM a corruption of Proms? Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:48, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could be 'Production And Operations Management'... I wonder if Roger Wright knows about this? Peridon (talk) 00:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! POM is merely a username to describe my real name - Philip O'Meara (Irish decent, if you're interested!). I'm pleasantly surprised that there is a Radio 3 listener in the wikipedia administration (and also that you have heard of the NGA scheme!) But I must add that the article is intended for information, not promotion. To Ronhjones, Radio 3 is not in competition with Classic FM - they are different and complementary stations. If Radio 3 doubled their listening figures they wouldn't get any more funding! So I politely request again to be unblocked!

Thank you

POM

I'd be prepared to accept that, but would prefer another admin to do the unblocking as I am rather too much of a Radio 3 fan to count as uninvolved. There are quite a few artistes that have been in the NGA scheme that haven't yet got articles but who probably merit them, (Ailish Tynan for one) and this might be a way of getting them... The NGA article currently looks NPOV (WP:NPOV) and I don't think there'd be any spam problem to come. Peridon (talk) 13:04, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am another R3-listening admin, but occasional enough not to count myself involved here. However I am concerned that you think that, because the BBC is a public service organization, edits about it cannot possibly be promotional. Editing with a WP:Conflict of interest is discouraged because editors with a COI find it difficult to adopt the WP:Neutral point of view which is one of our fundamental policies; all the more so, sometimes, if they are convinced that what they are promoting is a Good Cause. We spend a lot of time and effort explaining to such people that Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause.

Are you in fact employed by, or otherwise editing on behalf of, the BBC? If so, please read WP:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest. Do you understand my concern, and if unblocked are you willing to comply with that guideline? JohnCD (talk) 21:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JohnCD, I have read the COI link, and am willing to comply with those guidelines if unblocked!

Best

POM

Please note that I have unblocked here, pending username change. I currently don't see an issue with the username, as per the reasoning provided. –MuZemike 21:11, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was coming back to do the same. POM, welcome back, please go to WP:CHU to request a username change - read down to the bottom of that page and click on "Simple". I would just like to emphasis two points: (a) our idea of what is promotional is much wider than yours, covering any departure from a strictly neutral point of view, no matter how worthy and uncommercial the subject; and (b) although we have asked you to take "BBC" out of your username, you should still declare your interest when editing in any are where you have a COI. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Signum Quartet

The article Signum Quartet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

questionable notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aunty-S (talk) 19:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, POM. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, POM. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, POM. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]