User talk:PL Alvarez/Archive 2011

2011 Futures

Sorry to ask a possible silly question but how do I know if a player is notable and can be written in red or not? Thanks for the answer. Sorry had forgotten to add my name.Catgamer (talk) 18:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry PL Alvarez , but I do not know how to find out in little time if a player is notable or not so I just add the players that have a page as notable and you have to add the rest of the work I have not already done (if you recommend me to not continue editing the Futures give a me hint and I will stop with it).Catgamer (talk) 22:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have another question up to which date (nd tournament) have you updated the statistical things (because I would like to help you in updating this)? Thanks for your answer.Catgamer (talk) 09:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to disturb you once more but did I make a mistake in my additions to the futures , because you have deleted many of my additions.Thanks for your answer.Catgamer (talk) 15:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question once again: When I am editing the Futures then the column about the winning nations has problems to show me all the winning countries. It does not show the last 3 or 4 flags + country names and instead shows 'Template:Flagteam' . What have I done wrong and could you help fixing this problem?? Thanks again for your help. Catgamer (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have the same problem that it does not show you all the country flags in the statistics column or is it just a problem of mine??Thanks for your helpCatgamer (talk) 18:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I have another question, do you control the Futures updates I am typing in or not?? Thanks for your answer Catgamer (talk) 21:31, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Challenger

Hey, do we add the qualifying to the articles? I would say no... Kante4 (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok someone needs to delete or redirect the Sao Paulo one. Kante4 (talk) 14:47, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nominations

As a regular contributor to one of the five articles I have nominated, you might be interested in commenting on the following deletion discussion on ATP/WTA Tour qualifying articles: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 ASB Classic – Singles Qualifying --Pretty Green (talk) 15:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpages

You blanked User:PL Alvarez/AOK, User:PL Alvarez/AOM, User:PL Alvarez/Binghampton, and User:PL Alvarez/Brasilia. If you want these pages to be deleted, you can add {{db-author}} to them. Best, Cunard (talk) 23:48, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at 2011 Australian Open – Boys' Singles. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Step hen 12:43, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Challenger

Hey, let´s just wait until the draws are made before creating the singles and doubles article. Kante4 (talk) 17:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Same for ATP/WTA, why can´t you wait? Kante4 (talk) 19:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion the article shouldu be made as soon as the seeds are announced/chosen. Sellyme^Talk 22:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But they are/were not... 2011 BNP Paribas Open – Men's Doubles Kante4 (talk) 22:39, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, let´s wait until the draws are announced. here... Kante4 (talk) 23:49, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Qatar Ladies Open Draws

Please don't remove the content from the lead this is needed to provide context to an unknown reader who might just stumble upon the article. Afro (Talk) 16:38, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Qualifying

Yep, we should. Kante4 (talk) 17:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nominiated: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Challenger DCNS de Cherbourg – Singles Qualifying Kante4 (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Challenger of Dallas

Once again as I said above do not remove the content from the lead its needed to provide context to the average reader who might stumble upon the article, just because its a tennis draw does not mean its excluded from WP:LEAD nor WP:SUMMARY, the content remaining there is supported by policies it isn't up to debate, etc etc. Afro (Talk) 22:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Once again I'd like to remind you regarding the draws of 2011 Shimadzu All Japan Indoor Tennis Championships for example that Tennis draws are NOT excluded from WP:LEAD. Since this isn't the first time I've had to address this with you and specifically your edit here this constitutes as WP:REMOVAL. Afro (Talk) 15:36, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. KnowIG (talk) 10:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andres Molteni

This article has been created and deleted twice as non-notable, so I guarantee it shall happen again. Wait until he features in an ATP World Tour event. I heavily expanded the second version of the article, but no matter how well-written it is, the man isn't notable yet. Just a word of warning! Sellyme^Talk 12:06, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting of leads

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Do not delete leads to articles. Thank you. KnowIG (talk) 16:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrés Molteni for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrés Molteni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrés Molteni (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. KnowIG (talk) 16:22, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't help but laugh, even though it was (rightly) kept. Sellyme^Talk 00:07, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Little question to you

PL Alvarez, as you are a very active member of Wikipedia I'd like to ask you a question about editing tennis results. I always see these long 'minuses' when I look at the final results of a tournament, could you please tell me, if it is no problem for you, how to write these long 'minuses', because as you see it when I am editing a final result of a tournament I only know how to create the small ones. (I hope my question is understandible, because I am unfortunately no native speaker of English.) Thanks in advance, catgamer.Catgamer (talk) 21:55, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you're talking about en dashes versus em dashes. There are several "alt codes" available (Which I can't remember off the top of my head), but your best bet is to just type it normally, and wait for one of the numerous bots/scripts (I have a script myself) to fix them, if need be. Sellyme^Talk 00:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning - casue I just saw this

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Sellyme. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. KnowIG (talk) 14:30, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Ouellette

Hey, if he isn´t notable you should afd the article. Kante4 (talk) 13:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Ouellette. Kante4 (talk) 13:41, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could be interesting

Hey, check out the discussion here about removing the day-to-day summaries from Grand slams: Talk:2011 French Open. Kante4 (talk) 01:19, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Liam Broady

How are you doing? I notice you say Liam Broady passes WP:NTENNIS - I can't see how from looking at both his junior and men's tour stats - it's probably right under my nose but what criterion would it be? Best regards and appreciative of your hard work, Mayumashu (talk) 23:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from 2011 Campbell's Hall of Fame Tennis Championships. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 09:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Irish open

Hey, it´s done, check the article. Kante4 (talk) 16:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello PL Alvarez! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)