Jump to content

User talk:P0mbal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, P0mbal! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! —Travistalk 00:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


Holloway sanatorium

[edit]

Hello, per your Help Desk question, I have gone ahead and moved the article to Holloway Sanatorium for you. —Travistalk 00:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Jane Drew (about 1990).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Maxwell_Fry_1970.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Anthony Ludovici and Guy Drew 1900 window.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi, the messages above (not from me) are by way of explaantion asking you to clarify the copyright status of images you uploaded. Wikipedia NEEDS to know by way of appropriate tags what copyrights exist on images, so that images that are 'unreasonably' or unfairly uploaded can be removed, and those that the copyright holders do want on Wikipedia under a 'free' license can be preserved.

It would be much appreciated if you could consider adding appropriate tags to the images concerned, such as licensing the images concerned under GFDL or Creative Commons Attribution type licensing. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Song of Autumn

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of A Song of Autumn, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bartleby.com/249/17.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Song of Flight

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of A Song of Flight, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.lieder.net/lieder/get_text.html?TextId=13933. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Roundel: The little eyes that never knew Light

[edit]

I have nominated Roundel: The little eyes that never knew Light, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roundel: The little eyes that never knew Light. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? 9Nak (talk) 16:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P0mbal. I nominated the article to prevent it from being speedily deleted after being nominated (wrongly so, in my opinion). This way you and others can provide input before an administrator makes a decision. Please comment on the entry. Thanks. 9Nak (talk) 16:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, The Blue Mountains (Elgar), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, The Blue Mountains (Elgar) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. The Blue Mountains (Elgar) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Ecoleetage (talk) 12:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because fine work deserves merit

[edit]

I am very glad to see the Elgar/Noyes article back in a Wiki-friendly format. I also reviewed your past work and I feel you deserve commendation for much of your work here:

The Barnstar of High Culture
For tireless work in expanding the depth and scope of Wikipedia's cultural articles. Ecoleetage (talk) 20:09, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Be well. --Ecoleetage (talk) 20:09, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Lowestoft Boat

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Lowestoft Boat, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.poetryloverspage.com/poets/kipling/lowestoft_boat.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source for Image:Elgar to Paderewski letter004.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Elgar to Paderewski letter004.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Elgar to Paderewski letter003.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Elgar to Paderewski letter003.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Elgar to Paderewski letter002.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Elgar to Paderewski letter002.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Elgar to Paderewski letter001.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Elgar to Paderewski letter001.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:58, 19 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:58, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harriet Foster aka Muriel

[edit]

Hi! Since you ask, the mistake occurs in Winifrede Elwes's book (1935) Gervase Elwes: The Story of his Life (Grayson and Grayson), page 137: "Weingartner, who was, of course, the head and front of the Beethoven Festival, conducted, Mrs Harriet Foster sang the part of the Angel, Mr Ffrangçon [sic] Davies was the bass, and Dr Coward's magnificent choir was brought from Sheffield to sing the choral parts." As that was my source, I put Harriet(?) but made the link to Muriel, as it was evidently she! I was obeying w.p. rules not to synthesize, but much prefer the plain truth! Please excuse grammar. Eebahgum (talk) 13:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carillon (Elgar)

[edit]

Sorry, I didn't notice it was some sort of "official translation" of the French version. I was on my way replacing exonyms by endonyms and correcting links and went over it too fast. My apologies for that! --Hooiwind (talk) 16:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agnès Humbert

[edit]

Just wanted to give my thanks for your extensions to the article Agnès Humbert. I was simply dumbfounded when I saw she had no article so I created it, but couldn't find very much info. 安東尼 TALKies 19:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boris Vildé

[edit]

Created short stub for Boris Vildé thought you'd be intrested .安東尼 TALKies 20:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Flabiol back.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 19:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mute off.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ViperSnake151 16:12, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Flabiol_notes.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Flabiol_notes.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Flabiol_range.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Flabiol_range.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 62.30.249.131 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: J.delanoygabsadds 16:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Range of Flabiol, uploading a new version

[edit]

I have just had my image of the range of the flabiol removed because it did not have a copyright status. I am happy with that, I made a mistake, so therefore I have just uploaded the same image again, making sure it has the correct public domain status. This is shown in the table in the image page showing this new version there dated 7 December 2008. However, when I now go and look at the Flabiol page, nothing has changed, it is the image dated 23 November which was my first attempt - where I forget to put the copyright status in! I dont know what I can do - it looks as if I have ignored the warning about the copyright, but I have not intentionally. In fact I have tried this many times as you see, because the table of versions of the file now has 6 versions since 23 November up to to 7 December. It did remind me it was a duplicate file and I'm sure I said OK use the duplicate.P0mbal (talk) 20:11, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cleopatra 1934 film screenshot1.jpg

[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Cleopatra 1934 film screenshot1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC) --Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Free Blonde and 21 screenshot1.jpg)

[edit]

You've uploaded File:Free Blonde and 21 screenshot1.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Martin Luther King, Jr.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elgar Romance

[edit]

Interesting questions: shall ponder and revert. Tim riley (talk) 23:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:St Marys Town and Country School logo.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:St Marys Town and Country School logo.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Wollstonecraft

[edit]

Thanks for your addition to Mary Wollstonecraft. I've removed it because that section of the article is dedicated to explaining the Vindication itself. Another place for it might be the "Legacy" section, but I'm not sure it is quite important enough. Can you find some scholarly sources that mention the connection between the two? (The article is a featured article, which means that we need to use high-quality sources.) Thanks again! Awadewit (talk) 21:01, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elgar letters

[edit]

Hey P0mbal. Do you know when the Elgar-Paderewski letters you uploaded were first published? I'm worried they may not be out of copyright in the US, which Wikipedia requires that they be. {{PD-1923}} requires publication, you see, and personal correspondence wouldn't normally count. - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 12:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have the original letter. P0mbal (talk) 16:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

news

[edit]
The WORCESTERSHIRE Project Newsletter - March 2010

The WikiProject WORCESTERSHIRE Newsletter
No. 2 - March 2010
(Archived here.)
Morgan car factory main entrance, Malvern Link, Worcestershire
Welcome to the second WikiProject Worcestershire newsletter

You are probably receiving this because you have significantly contributed to one of our pages. If you are not yet a participant in the Worcestershire project, now is the time to consider joining - it might help you get some assistance on a page you feel particularly attached to.
Here goes for the second irregular news bulletin...

First GA in 2010

We finally got over our euphoria over the Malvern, Worcestershire promotion to Good Article status. The GA sets a benchmark for the quality to be targeted for other articles in the project, and clearly demonstrated how important teamwork is.

Recently founded

A lot of work has already been done since the Worcs project was started, including the recent tagging of the talk pages of all the articles about people connected with Worcestershire, keeping spam and vandalism at bay, and welcoming new editors on their talk pages.

Experts needed!

The Worcestershire project mainly concerns settlements. It's generally agreed that the immediate priority now is to improve the articles that shiould be the flagships of the project, namely Worcester, and Worcestershire which are some of the articles in the worst state.

Meet up

Kudpung has booked his flight from Asia and will be back in Malvern from 1 April for a month, and looks forward to meeting up with as many Wikipedians as possible, especially those who work on the Worcs project.

NEWS

Two major debates are raging on the 'pedia and we have been cautiously taking part.

WP:BLP (Biography of Living Persons)

In for a shake up is an accumulation of nearly 50,000 totally unsourced articles that may end up on the cutting room floor after a period of grace. As a project, we can help by taking a look at those BLP in the county and doing what we can before the axe falls.

citations

A war almost broke out over citation formats, but a mature approach from Worcs project members prevented any physical injury. There, are only three basic rules for citations: 1. All articles must have them. 2. Consitency of format throughout an articles. 3. Changes to the format require a consensus.
We are not obliged to use citation templates, and WP:LDR might not be such a good idea while chunks of text and/or their references are being copied and pasted around related articles in the county. In any case, let's always discuss what we have in mind HERE.

new project pages

The project main page has been pruned to be cleaner, and much of the support material has been transferred to dedicated pages. New usefull banners and templates have been created, and shortcuts to the new pages that also include a side bar navigator and a brand new easily edited To Do list.

new participant

After all the hints getting him to join, we now welcome User:wotnow !

sysop (admin)

Our only admin has resigned his tools. It would be great to have an active admin as a member of the project. If you think you would be able to cope with all the responsibility adminship involves, checkout WP:RfA and nominate yourself. Nobody needs to have a high edit count or to be an expert in all areas, but being active, having a reasonable overview of the workings of the Wikipedia, and a decent level of maturity, are expected minima. The process is not painless, and is worse than a British army promotion board! Alternatively you can always nominate another user.

Would you like to join the WP:WORCS?? Please enter yourself at WP:WORCS! - new editors are always welcome!

Happy Wikying, and thanks to everyone else who has contributed to our articles.

New project resources

Before making any major edits to articles or stubs, please be sure to read the new WP:WORCS/HowTo. Urgent tasks are now listed at: WP:WORCS/ToDo. It should be referred to often, and will be your main stop for most maintenance tasks. We recommend keeping the page on your watchlist. Most project pages now have brand new side bar for easy navigation. (Thanks, GyroMagician). Priority Articles== The top priority articles have been identified as probably being:

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Worcestershire.

Other priorities:

  • The recommended priority by kind is for creation/improvement of complete articles is:
  1. Places in the county
  2. Schools in the county (Particularly susceptible to vandalism - please keep them on your watch lists if possible).
  3. Transport in the county
  4. Notable buildings/objects/geo features/AONB/Heritage sites, etc. in the county
  5. History in the county
  6. Industry & Commerce in the county.
  7. People in the county - NOTE: These all need the Worcs project banner adding to their talk pages, and assessing.
  8. County related articles about things not actually in the county, and/or other related projects.

These lists will help:

New Aims

Specific aims for the project are:-

  • Monitor
    The watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
  • Infoboxes
    Some of our articles need their infoboxes completing infobox.
  • References
    Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference. If you are uploadiing an image, be sure it has a correct FUR, and that you have preferably already created a link on the page where you want it to be.
  • Moves, merges, and multiple edits
    Please be careful when performing articles moves and check if anyone seems to be in the middle of doing the same thing. If he; she, or they are, stop and have a chat about it. Otherwise you may be unintentionally duplicating or reverting each other's work. This is particularly important if an article is currently under a GA review. image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Guidelines

Get your article referenced now!

Imprint
Written by User:Kudpung • All comments to WT:WORCS
Based on an original concept by WP:YORKS

Orphaned non-free image File:The Wind at Dawn song by Elgar cover 1880.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Wind at Dawn song by Elgar cover 1880.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for deleting this unused file, it's replaced by a better one.P0mbal (talk) 20:31, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chandos Anthem by Handel cover.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chandos Anthem by Handel cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Elgar

[edit]

You are by a very long way the editor who has made the most contributions to the main Elgar article. I should much like to be reassured that you don't disapprove (in general terms at least) of the wholesale additions I have made in the past week or so. I have lately (with much help from other contributors) got the Adrian Boult article to Featured Article, and it would be good to do the same for Elgar - but I don't want to tread on any toes. Grateful for your thoughts - Tim riley (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Alice Elgar

[edit]

"Caroline Alice Elgar (9 October 1848 – 7 April 1920)"

"Caroline Alice Roberts, known as Alice, was born in Bhooj, Gujarat, India, in 1860."

User:Kraxler's edit seemed to be trying to resolve the contradiction, rather than vandalism. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 10:58, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Too kind. If he spotted contradictory birth years might he have taken the trouble to find out which was correct? Or if it is a random resolution, he might have guessed correctly and chosen the second one to change. At least he is to be thanked for revealing the difference! P0mbal (talk) 16:06, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elgar peer review

[edit]

As foreshadowed on the article talk page, I have put the main Elgar article forward for peer review. I have, as you may see, emphasised that I am concerned not to trespass on the contributions of other editors, notably yourself. Any comments you have will be most gratefully received. It would be good to get E.E. on the front page, if we can get the article up to Featured Article level. - Tim riley (talk) 20:31, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pertransit benefaciendo

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Pertransit benefaciendo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 16:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Wollstonecraft

[edit]

I have returned to the Mary Wollstonecraft article. I notice that your claims, while very interesting, have not been substantiated. I for one would be delighted to read any more about this intriguing connection.MW's talk page says:

The key facts, without expansion and links are: (a) Thomas and Mary Taylor befriended the young Mary Wollstonscaft. (a) Taylor influenced Wollstoncraft through his interest in Platonism. (c) Wollstoncraft's "Rights of Women" influenced Taylor in his "Rights of Brutes", as acknowledged by him.

Thomas Taylor (neoplatonist) says:

He and his wife took Mary Wollstonecraft into their home when she was an unhappy teenager, and thus influenced the future author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Wollstonecraft's book inspired him to write his Vindication of the Rights of Brutes.

MW and TT were born within a year of each other; for TT & wife to have welcomed MW into their home, he must have married as a teenager - possible but unusual. Can you offer any sources to suggest this? And to back up the other assertions? BrainyBabe (talk) 06:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest and comments. They were all three teenagers when TT married. Taylor was born 15 May 1758 and married Mary Morton in 1777, therefore a teenager when married "in his nineteenth year", i.e. age 18. Their friend the then unhappy teenager Mary Wollstonecraft was born 27 Apr 1759, so about a year younger than Thomas. See Wikisource on TT. My family tree has MM born "about" 1760 - but this is too vague and looks like guesswork, though I do remember from somewhere (I hear you say "not good enough", and you are right, Wikipedia should not be sourced from vague memories) that she was younger than he. Explaining my interest, what makes me keen to discover all this is that TT was a direct ancestor, via Mary Taylor dau of TT and MM, and I have had the pleasure of conversations with Kathleen Raine whose son married into my family, finding out that she knew lots about TT. I aim to find sources of MM's birth date or her age when married, and about the MW episode in TTs life. I wonder if Mary Morton is mentioned in any Woolstonecraft literature. P0mbal (talk) 21:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this. You're right: it's nowhere near good enough for WP, I'm afraid. I haven't seen any references to TT and MM in the MW literature, but I will keep my eyes open. It strikes me as unlikely that MW's parents would have allowed her to stay with a newly married teenage couple. As all this is unsourced, it needs to be removed from the TT article; will you do this, or should I? (It can be cut and pasted to the talk page there, where it can wait till you have sources.) I *have* had a look at A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes, and it satirises MW's position, so any effect she had on him cannot have been a favourable one. BrainyBabe (talk) 09:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have found a brief mention of TT in Lyndall Gordon's biography of MW. I don't think it is significant enough for our MW article, but I will add the reference to A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and Thomas Taylor (neoplatonist).

Heimliche Aufforderung

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Heimliche Aufforderung, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.lieder.net/lieder/get_text.html?TextId=10644.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elgar FAC

[edit]

Hello, P0mbal. I want to let you know, as a huge contributor to the article on Edward Elgar, that I have nominated it for FA. Regards – Tim riley (talk) 10:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see the consensus at the FAC page that the list of selected works, which I think is chiefly your contribution, should be deleted in line with other FA composer articles. - Tim riley (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your practical suggestion, which I have supported on the FAC page. If the article is promoted to FA I shall alert you and perhaps you will then wield the secateurs as you suggest. Tim riley (talk) 12:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The main Elgar article has been promoted to Featured Article. As you suggested on the FAC page, the list of selected works needs drastic trimming; are you still okay to do it? Happy to undertake it, if not. Tim riley (talk) 20:47, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I shall do it, hoping people will see what I am aiming for, and expect some critical editing. P0mbal (talk) 16:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Warmest thanks. The only thing anyone is now likely to boggle at (IMO) is the preamble ("selected on whose criteria?" you know) - but let 'em! I think the article is now in excellent shape. Hugely obliged for your colleaguely cooperation, and at your service if I can do anything of help to you on WP. Tim riley (talk) 15:57, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Delius

[edit]

I don't know whether you are interested in Delius, but if you are, Brianboulton and I have been working on his article over the past few weeks, and will be putting it forward for peer review shortly. Any comments you might wish to make will be most gratefully received (though I do realise that some music-lovers don't get on with Delius and will of course quite understand if you are not interested.) Regards Tim riley (talk) 14:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the invitation, but in the best possible way I express it I don't have the time to study/review another composer right now. Though I do like Delius music. My main interests right now are the classics, and Elgar and Richard Strauss. P0mbal (talk) 23:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course – wholly understood. If I can ever be of assistance on any of your articles, please don't hesitate to call on me. Best wishes. Tim riley (talk) 19:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Caterpillar Club

[edit]

You are in Edit history as an editor on this article. It has been multiply tagged for improvement as an alternative to being recommended for deletion. This is a request for editorial intervention to improve this article. Please help if possible.

Georgejdorner (talk) 17:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the need, but I do not have sufficient interest or time to work on it. I hope somebody will. P0mbal (talk) 23:48, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Main page appearance

[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on June 2, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 2, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! ۞ Tbhotch™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 18:29, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Elgar in 1917

Edward Elgar (1857–1934) was an English composer. Among his best-known compositions are orchestral works such as the Enigma Variations, the Pomp and Circumstance Marches, concertos for violin and cello, and two symphonies. He also composed choral works, including The Dream of Gerontius, chamber music and songs. He was appointed Master of the King's Musick in 1924. Although his works are regarded as quintessentially English, most of his musical influences were not from England but from continental Europe. A self-taught Catholic composer from a poor background, he nevertheless married the daughter of a senior British army officer. He struggled to achieve success until his forties, when his Enigma Variations proved immediately popular. His following work, The Dream of Gerontius (1900) remains a core repertory work in Britain and elsewhere. One of the first composers to take the gramophone seriously, he conducted a series of recordings of his works between 1914 and 1925. Elgar's music came, in his later years, to be seen as appealing chiefly to British audiences. More recently, some of his works have been taken up again internationally, but the music remains more played in Britain than elsewhere. (more...)

Charles Villiers Stanford

[edit]

I don't know if your Elgarian sympathies extend to Stanford, but if they do you might like to look in at the current peer review of his article. Quite understand if not, of course, but your comments would be gratefully received. All the best. Tim riley (talk) 15:54, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Manners (bass)

[edit]

Hello, P0mbal. Could you kindly add a page number to your recently-added citation? Many thanks. Tim riley (talk) 17:12, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mrs Henry Clarke

[edit]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mrs Henry Clarke, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/2881087.Mrs_Henry_Clarke.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mrs Henry Clarke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plymouth High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean Sabbagh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newfoundland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SURREY and Award of Recognition

[edit]
The Keys of Surrey for informed research on locations in the county
We would like to recognise your recent work demonstrating very high scholarly diligence to Croydon High School (now Greater London with a considerable Surrey intake) and to Woldingham School in the county. Adam 37 (talk) 12:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dunkirk evacuation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shaista Suhrawardy Ikramullah may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:16, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:James Kantor.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:James Kantor.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have emailed permissions-en@wikimedia.org with an email from Nicholas Wolpe the nephew of James Kantor giving express permission for the photo to be used.P0mbal (talk) 19:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, P0mbal. You have new messages at Talk:Salut d'Amour.
Message added 23:53, 4 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jackson Peebles (talk) 23:53, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Statimc.net works just fine

[edit]

Probably the reason was when you put the ref tags on your post, it didn't work because it will just go back to the talkpage. I just tried the link in the refs section, after trying http://www.statimc.net/ all by itself, it works just fine in both cases.Skookum1 (talk) 14:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:James Kantor.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:James Kantor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern, but I have the permission of Nicholas Wolpe, son of Kantor's sister AnnMarie Wolpe. Kantor was a friend of my parents and my sister and I knew him, and I have an email from Nicholas giving permission for the photo to be used on Wikipedia. P0mbal (talk) 23:21, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

James Kantor

[edit]

Hi, we are making some changes to the James Kantor page shortly. I know you have edited this page quite a lot and I believe your parents knew Kantor. However, my partner is James Kantors daughter , Tanya. I have tried to find a way to contact you to no avail, i cannot find any contact forms on Wiki so am using this. lease delete when you've read this. I am sure you know a way to contact someone via their wiki so please do get in touch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by H11poc (talk • contribs) 11:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC) Would be be pleased to contact you. I live near London. Try johngrmorrison@hotmail.com P0mbal (talk) 15:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aurel Stroe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vladimir Solovyov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stanford Robinson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eric Robinson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Connie Leon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forever and a Day. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sheila Browning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heather Angel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opening Sentence of United Kingdom

[edit]

Hello. Please don't change the opening sentence of this article any more without engaging in discussion here. We are advised to engage in Being Bold, Reverting and then Discussing controversial changes, and this doesn't advise reinstating things again after they have been reverted once. The 3rr rule specifies an absolute maximum, and does not advise that you can go up to this limit without penalty. United Kingdom's opening sentences have been agreed by a longstanding consensus but have much later been victims to edit-wars, and so people are a little bit sensitive about it. Can I gently suggest that the discussion has to take place in a relevant section on the Talk page (as I have pointed you towards), rather than by edit-summary? Many thanks.  DDStretch  (talk) 09:20, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Wilcoxon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Jackson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, P0mbal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joan Woodbury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heather Angel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hi Gang! (radio series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. George's Hall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hi Gang! (radio series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sarah Churchill and Jack Warner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, P0mbal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, P0mbal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joan Elwes

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Joan Elwes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bollymine (talk) 10:13, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

[edit]

Hi, I'm GB fan. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Joan Elwes, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ GB fan 10:26, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Elwes moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Joan Elwes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PATH SLOPU 17:01, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joan Elwes has been accepted

[edit]
Joan Elwes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 11:12, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Woof

[edit]

Hi, Thanks for taking the dog out of Rowsby Woof. I think the article is better without that distraction. Best wishes, Eebahgum (talk) 12:58, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The War Lord screenshot.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The War Lord screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Is she not passing fair (1908 Edward Elgar song) cover.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Is she not passing fair (1908 Edward Elgar song) cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:52, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:In the Dawn song by Elgar cover 1902.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:In the Dawn song by Elgar cover 1902.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 04:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:P0mbal&oldid=1258266906"