User talk:Ozeye
2
Image copyright problem with File:HighStreet Oxford October 2007.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:HighStreet Oxford October 2007.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Chateau de chenonceau front to the west.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Chateau de chenonceau front to the west.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Palace of Westminster
[edit]Hello, Ozeye. I was pleasantly surprised to see this picture of the Cloisters Court... I wonder how you got access, and whether there is any other interesting material you'd like to share. There aren't many pictures of the courtyards around—with the exception of the Royal Court—so I am very interested in whatever you or anyone else can procure. Waltham, The Duke of 22:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Image galleries
[edit]You have repeatedly added an image gallery to the article Sheldonian Theatre. Wikipedia's image use policy explicitly advises against doing so, so please do not add the gallery again. --Stemonitis (talk) 21:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC).
- Sorry Stemonitis, but I don't share your interpretation of the meaning of the image use oplicy. I would contend that the images in the Gallery section for the Sheldonian Theatre article do "...add to the reader's understanding of the subject..." as per said Image Use Policy by showing the Theatre from different perspectives, its interior and a view from within the Theatre's Cupola. If you have objections to the quailty of the photography, or of some other nature please put them on the official record, but I cannot see that the final set of (I believe four) images that comprised the gallery did violate the Image Use Policy.--Ozeye
The appropriate thing to do is to link to Wikimedia Commons, where the reader can see many more pictures. There is no need for a gallery. Images should be placed inline, except in very rare circumstances. I would say there may be room in the current text for one or two pictures, to illustrate parts of the text (one interior shot, perhaps one of the ceiling, which is discussed in the text), but no more than that. Additional shots of the exterior add nothing to the reader's understanding. --Stemonitis (talk) 10:54, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Ozeye. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ozeye. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
updating HDI
[edit]When you update some information, you need to create a completely new citation for it, not just tweak bits of the existing citation, as often tweaking doesn't result in a valid citation. In the case of Queensland, there was an archive-url present which referred to an earlier set of data. I think I have now fixed this problem in Queensland, but please create new citations rather than tweak them. Kerry (talk) 22:17, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- The reference is to a dynamic database which remains the valid source for the data and so the archive-url is the same as the currently valid source. Please verify and thank you for your reflections. Ozeye (talk) 00:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)