User talk:Oxfordcommadrama

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Funcrunch (talk) 22:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to circus freaks

For the most part, I nodded along, even through the Gaganalogy. But "Pogo"? Come on. Everyone knows that when the paint comes off, the clown is down, name, backstory and special abilities included. Same with painted wrestlers, masked wrestlers, musical wrestling promoters and masked musicians. At least everyone should know. The part of John Wayne Gacy that made life better for children should never be confused with the vastly overshadowing persona. Not even rhetorically, for a good cause, or as a joke.

This should not be taken as an indication that you did anything wrong or are in any actual danger of losing your Talk Page privilege (on this). But you came close to crossing a line there, in my holier-than-thou opinion. Just be mindful, eh? And good luck. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, my occasional marginal insinuations on those things you call "Oxford commas" may reasonably be taken as indicative of some deep-rooted resentment, but never misconstrued as some nutty animosity toward you, the dramatic person. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]