User talk:Ovsk
Whose sock?
[edit]Whose sock are you, please? Bishonen | tålk 09:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC).
- @Bishonen: I came here from Wikipediocracy. I am rnu there. Ovsk (talk) 09:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Well, my question concerned your history on Wikipedia, not so much who you are elsewhere on the internet. Are you saying you have an account and an identity at Wikipediocracy, but have had none at Wikipedia before creating this account? Really? Bishonen | tålk 09:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC).
- Yes. Many users of WPO have never had Wikipedia accounts. I have made a few minor edits as an IP, but this is my first account. Ovsk (talk) 09:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- It might be worth mentioning that there is a WPO user called "OvskMendov1" who claims responsibility for the recent Wikipedia Sucks Joe job. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Well, my question concerned your history on Wikipedia, not so much who you are elsewhere on the internet. Are you saying you have an account and an identity at Wikipediocracy, but have had none at Wikipedia before creating this account? Really? Bishonen | tålk 09:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC).
January 2024
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.