User talk:Oukselo

...and One Classical

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ...and One Classical, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ccdmd.qc.ca/ressources/?id=1253&onglet=description. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ...and One Classical

A tag has been placed on ...and One Classical requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 18:04, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ...and One Classical

A tag has been placed on ...and One Classical, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. The Helpful One ^(Review) 18:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with ...and One Classical. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Helpful One ^(Review) 18:18, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK - we all have to learn! --The Helpful One ^(Review) 20:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ...and One Classical

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ...and One Classical, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 09:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PROD of ...and One Classical

Hi,

I proposed it because it does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards for books. It just gives instructions how to audition for Shakespeare plays, has not received any relevant media coverage, has not won an important prize, is not by a notable author, ... - It is just a book with nothing to stand out of the millions of other books there are. Since you deleted the PROD tag, I am going to nominate for deletion as an AfD. You can then state in the deletion discussion why the book should be notable after all.

Regards, Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 13:34, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of ...and One Classical

I have nominated ...and One Classical, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/...and One Classical. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 13:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cover Big.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cover Big.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]