User talk:OttaSotta

Welcome!

Hello, OttaSotta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Block notice

Please do not abuse multiple accounts. I have disabled this account, as it is obviously a sock of User:Jonas Poole. Parsecboy (talk) 01:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to use this account again. As I said, this account is not a socketpuppet, nor have I ever intended to use it as such. Could someone please remove this ban. I've got exploration articles I'd like to eventually edit. OttaSotta (talk) 04:19, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to be UNBLOCKED now

This user is the owner of multiple Wikipedia accounts in a manner permitted by policy.

Please unblock account that is obviously not a sockpuppet

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

OttaSotta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

99.67.56.209 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

I’m really tired of this. This has already been shown NOT to be a sock account. Please remove block

Blocking administrator: Parsecboy (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Shown where? Certainly, this account and User:Jonas Poole are editing from the same computer. What's your explanation? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 04:16, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OttaSotta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has already been shown elsewehere (see Incidents archive Socking Jonas Poole) that I didn't intend to use this profile for "socking", so I'd like to be able to edit again, seeing as how I've done nothing wrong.

Decline reason:

It seems from the ANI discussion below and the discussion at Jonas Poole that you want to use this account (as well as Mumbles57 (talk · contribs) and RiffRaffBot (talk · contribs)) to evade accountability for your edits as Jonas Poole, in violation of the sockpuppetry policy. Sandstein 06:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Comment to other reviewers - ANI discussion referred to is here).
Otta/Jonas, since you admit you're the same person, can you explain why you need this second account? — Tivedshambo (t/c) 05:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]