User talk:Osman bey

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ayyubid dynasty has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ayyubid dynasty was changed by Osman bey (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870933 on 2016-09-05T16:39:21+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kouhi (talk) 08:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint about your edits of Seljuk-related topics

Seljuk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Seljuk Empire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Osman bey (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Please see User talk:EdJohnston#User:Osman bey. You are not the first person to insist that a modern Turkish version of the article name be put in the opening sentence of a Seljuk-reated article. The Seljuks did not speak modern Turkish and they used a different script, so some people have opposed this. Warring about the different language versions of an article name is very common for nationalist edit warriors, and in fact, this does raise a concern about sockpuppetry. The issue of the Turkish name has been discussed at Talk:Seljuk Empire#Turkish spelling. If you continue to make edits like this, without waiting long enough to get a talk page consensus for your changes, you are risking a block. You can respond to the complaint on my talk page if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: The discussion of the name wasn't finalized and I recommend you don't go harsh on this new user, who didn't even participate in the discussion. Alexis Ivanov (talk) 04:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Kouhi (talk) 11:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kouhi (talk) 12:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are leaving early.

I will be at my talk page in case you come back Alexis Ivanov (talk) 22:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Osman bey, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Adam in MO Talk 01:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]