User talk:Oskilian
Calling programmers
[edit]We need coders for the WikiProject Disambigation fixer. We need to make a program to make faster and easier the fixing of links. We will be happy if you could check the project. You can Help! --Neo139 09:11, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
No, thx -Osk
re: your Proposed Deletions request
[edit]I am going to cancel your request as declined. I understand your issue of perceived fairness but the two are not exactly equivalent. The important distinction is that one is in the Template-space of the project and the other is in a sub-page of the User-space. See Template:User macosx for more.
Wikipedia's compromise on infobox templates is that they are not generally allowed in the template space but may be allowable in the userspace. Infoboxes created anywhere other than in the userspace are subject to speedy-deletion.
I don't pretend to understand the logic behind the current compromise but I must also admit that I never understood the controversy over userboxes. I don't personally use them. Sorry. Rossami (talk) 18:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Rat (zodiac)
[edit]Hi. In your last edit to this article, you seem to have confused me with another editor. That editor made other changes to the article besides removing the Not verified tag so, if the zodiac is your thing, you might want to look at those as well.
I had not looked at the edit history or anything - I only looked at the article, saw it made claims and lacked sources, and thought it needed a sources tag.. I probably thought the same thing tha you did! :) Cheers. --Mal 22:29, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I don't think I made any confusions: I added the not verified tag again, and I didn't try to say who was responsible for removing it. I just saw the tag was not there anymore, there were no dramatic changes to the article, and there were no responses to my message on the talk page, so I just put it again. Don't take it personally, ok? Oskilian 15:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh I wasn't taking anything personally. :) I just wanted to clear up any possible confusion. Some of the other articles in the Chinese zodiac series are similarly unverified (though given the subject matter, some may well be unverifiable). --Mal 18:23, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Skype
[edit]
You might note that at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Intelligence, also introduced some extraneous text around some numerical characters. This may be due to a combination of your browser and Skype trying to identify and highlight telephone numbers. Thank you.--Rumping (talk) 17:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- You're right, sorry about that. Oskilian (talk) 15:11, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
File:LifeSentenceMap-2.PNG missing description details
[edit]
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:24, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
The file File:LifeSentenceMap-2.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused. Superseded by File:Life Sentence Map New.png.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
