User talk:Oskar Sigvardsson

; Archives
	Big Bang – April 2006; April 2006 – Januari 2007; ; ;

Want something?
Click here to add a new section.

WikiCast

In followup to the IRC disscusion the ideas where

1) Basic Calculasu course 20 "Joy of Math" - covering 'intresting' math problems simmilar to those covered by the Mathametical Recreations Column of the Scientific american

As WikiCast is a wiki, you are welcome to propose your own format, and get feedback. In fact it's preferable if you did, so that you are not constrained by any pre-concived ideas I have :-)

My rough idea in respect of 2) was to keep it at a general level, ie not 'hard' math like a calculus course would be.

However I look forward to seeing your ideas :-) ShakespeareFan00 00:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roe v. Wade Featured Article Review

Hi, I noticed that you were involved in the initial review of the Roe v. Wade article. It's now up for review again, and your comments are invited. See here.Ferrylodge 05:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCast - Joy Of Math idea, and others..

In respect of the Joy of Math idea, I am suggest you look through http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Mathematics

The calculus course format I leave to you.

ShakespeareFan00 12:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Here's some Penguins for you! Penguins somehow in their own strange way promote WikiLove and hopefully these Penguins have made your day seem even better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! Crested Penguin 06:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Your edit to House of Leaves

Is this version of the entry more accurate? (You can see the difference here.) I don't know much about Norse mythology, so I really don't if these statements are accurate. I just think that, if those 3 gods did lose those specific body parts (through sacrifice or not), it should probably be mentioned in the article. If they're not accurate, please feel free to remove the passage again. :) Thank you! Wyatt Riot 13:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! That one comment made me want to read more Norse mythology, now I just have to fit it in with everything else I want to read! :) I hope that, with the overt references already listed, there may be more that you'll discover. Thank you! Wyatt Riot 23:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wikibreak

Thanks for your message while I was on break. Don't worry, I am not going to leave Wikipedia any time soon. Here's what I wrote about leaving more than a year ago. Nice to hear from you, NoSeptember 00:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi there

I saw your vote on the Wolpo Afd. He is the subject of many many not trivail reliable sources and has been active in many important causes - why do you think that he does not meet the primary notability criterion? David Spart (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) 13:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Me Again..:)

Hey,

I hope you remember me, the guy you helped on irc channel. I made a few more edits to the article Zile and want to hear your valuable comments about it. Please have a look at it when you have time.

See you,--Ugur Olgun 16:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JohnnyCashAmericanIIISolitaryMan.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:JohnnyCashAmericanIIISolitaryMan.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon

I've asked a question at Talk:Amazon (disambiguation) that you might be able to answer since you changed the redirect. Why does Amazon redirect to Amazons rather than Amazon (disambiguation) Surely the world's largest river, the world's largest rainforest and a huge multi national company are all equally as notable as the ancient legendary people? Sabine's Sunbird talk 07:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious!

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		For the laugh with your comment on the Reference Desk here. The reference desk could use a little more humour like you to pass the time between mind numbingly stupid questions! L^ie! 04:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorting organization

Great job on the sorting navbox, I love it. ~ Booya ^Bazooka 18:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also hate the standard text too and frequently try to change the setting. I suggest trying changing your skin to colgne blue which is very different ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 15:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delighted

Thank you for that extremely kind reaction to my piece in the NYRB--warmly appreciated. Best regards,--Wageless (talk) 21:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Rescue Contest revival

There is a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:Article Rescue Squadron about reviving the Wikipedia:Article rescue contest. I noticed you were listed as one of the judges, I would appreciate it very much if you would lend your experience to the discussion. -- RoninBK _{T C} 15:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Generating Permutations

Hey thanks man! But I got the problem solved now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by A Real Kaiser (talk • contribs) 04:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ellipse derivation 2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ellipse derivation 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikichess

You used to be User:Gkhan right? So you were in the chess championship on wikipedia right? I just wanted to say that Wikichess is back up. See WP:WIKICHESS. It's in the sandbox. (Want a game?) ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me, but mind the alphas!) 07:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chuck missler

The article Chuck missler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Blank.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Italomex (talk) 05:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Brainteaser.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Derivation of the Cartesian form for an ellipse for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derivation of the Cartesian form for an ellipse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derivation of the Cartesian form for an ellipse until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Weiqi-white-empty.PNG

The file File:Weiqi-white-empty.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Weiqi-black-empty.PNG

The file File:Weiqi-black-empty.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible example on Stable sorting

Would you be interested giving opinions or suggestions on a stable sorting example page I'm constructing. A first draft is over Talk:Sorting_algorithm#How_is_this_stable_sort_example?

Also a newer, evolving, example is found in my sandbox at: User:Lent/sandbox .

And out of curiosity, did you know that a Shift-click on a Wikipedia sortable table column does a secondary sort?

Thanks! --Lent (talk) 11:31, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]