User talk:OrthodoxyNoOtherFaith

May 2018

Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 00:58, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:59, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have revoked your talk page access because of your vile and unacceptable personal attack above. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:04, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cullen328: wow. he managed two more edits while I filed the report. —usernamekiran(talk) 01:12, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Wittgenstein123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:52, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]