User talk:Orson mike
License tagging for Image:Vijaydurg Simley Beach.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Vijaydurg Simley Beach.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Image:HiddenBeach_(before_Pural_Beach)_CloseUp.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]_CloseUp.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. feydey 11:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Image:Hook_Beach_CloseUp.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. feydey 11:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)License tagging for Image:Vijaydurg Hybrid Satellite.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Vijaydurg Hybrid Satellite.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vijaydurg (city), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Vijayadurg (city). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:25, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vijaydurg fort, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Vijayadurg fort. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Some advice
[edit]Hey Orson mike. The warnings above may look pretty sscary, but the advice behind them is quite simple. You've made an understandable error: copying-and-pasting article content from one page to another. When we want to create an alternative spelling, such as with Vijayadurg, we don't copy the content, but instead redirect the less well-known spelling to the more well know spelling. To do this, the only content of the lesser spelling's article should be "#REDIREC T Preferred spelling", without the quote marks and without the space between the C and the T. I've done this for you on the two article mentioned above. Any questions, let me know. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 12:03, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
May 2009
[edit]Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Vijaydurg fort. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. ArglebargleIV (talk) 13:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Requested History merges on Vijaydurg (city) and Vijaydurg fort
[edit]Hi there.
I took the liberty to tag the two articles for a history merge so that the contribution history of the original articles dating back several years can be restored. Cheers, --MLauba (talk) 13:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
I would like to know as to why you deleted the reference 'Purandare, Babasaheb- Raja Shivachhatrapati' at 3 places in your recent edits of Shivaji. You haven’t even mentioned the reason for such a deletion. Inline citations are important and shouldn’t be deleted. Kesangh (talk) 17:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Vulpes vulpes - Common Image.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vulpes vulpes - Common Image.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 10:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eric Jon Phelps, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eric Jon Phelps
[edit]
Hello Orson mike. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Eric Jon Phelps".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eric Jon Phelps}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:40, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Red Fox 2007.jpg
[edit]
You uploaded or restored , File:Red Fox 2007.jpg, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.
If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).
If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.
Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:36, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Red Fox 2007.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Red Fox 2007.jpg, which you've attributed to Ian Stickland. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Hook Beach CloseUp.JPG listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hook Beach CloseUp.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 02:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Vijaydurg Nappy beach.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vijaydurg Nappy beach.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 02:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
