User talk:Orichalcon

Hi, you uploaded Image:redback.JPG and Image:Redbackmale.JPG, these images currently have no copyright information, could you please add source details to the image pages. Thanks.--nixie 03:28, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Setanta_OhAilpin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Setanta_OhAilpin.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 18:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

WP:AFL

Hi mate, I suggest you join WikiProject AFL if you love your footy, and also take a look at Category:Carlton Blues players and the Portal:Australian rules football. Drop us a line with any questions mate. Cheers, R o gerthat ^Talk 08:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work

Nicely done on all these Blues articles in particular mate. Keep up the good work mate, and be sure to spread the word of WP:AFL. R o gerthat ^Talk 07:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Not sure what the "Welcome to Wikipedia" thing was about. I've been here for over a year. Orichalcon 01:02, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed there was no welcome message, on first glance I thought you were relatively new. Obviously not :) R o gerthat ^Talk 04:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

West Coast Eagles players

thats a damn good effort adding all those West Coast player articles. how did you make them only a few minutes apart? Remy B 02:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I used a template and a couple of sites with the stats on them, then added the new information onto the template for each player. Takes longer for players that have been to 2 or more clubs. Orichalcon 02:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice

I see you've been told this before, but excellent work on the players for the AFL WikiProject. Sambo2612 13:41, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How to fix the template "Infobox afl player" bug

Hi,

The template "Infobox afl player" you use has currently a bug for the "careerhighlights=" section, which, I see, obliged you to use a BR kludge, such as:

 | careerhighlights= <BR>
* Brisbane Lions Rising Star Nomination 2001
* Brisbane Lions Best First Year Player 2001

Two informations that would be useful for your work:

1) As a temporary kludge, you can have a better result with the infamous NOWIKI kludge:

 | careerhighlights= <nowiki></nowiki>
* Brisbane Lions Rising Star Nomination 2001
* Brisbane Lions Best First Year Player 2001

The difference being that you won't have an empty line any more between the blue header and the bulletted list of highlights. I have used it on Robert Copeland for instance, cf. the new page code.

2) As a permanent fix, see the code for the Template:Infobox Album, which had the very same bug for years (in its bulletted "Professional reviews" section). It was fixed some months ago (see the template's code, or I think it was [[1]] who found the trick), so the solution exists. Fixing your template the same way they fixed their, would allow you to get a perfect result with just the plain code:

 | careerhighlights=
* Brisbane Lions Rising Star Nomination 2001
* Brisbane Lions Best First Year Player 2001

Regards, -- 62.147.37.227 09:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Humourous

"Australian's spell it humourous"... Not according to my best researches. See [2]. Thanks for your interest. --Spellmaster 15:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I, and everyone else I've known has always spelled it "humourous". So I guess you can bite my arse on that one. It's the Australian spelling, regardless of whether it's in your little american or british dictionaries. Orichalcon 16:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to see a copy of the Macquarie Dictionary, the standard Australian reference dictionary, which lists "humorous" as being correct, or User talk:Spellmaster. It is very unlikely indeed that I would want to "bite your arse", and Wikipedia does not use how you and everybody else you know spells words as a standard, but prefers to go with verifiable references. Best wishes, --Guinnog 01:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't find my "Bite my arse" comment humourous? That's unfortunate. Orichalcon 04:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but more humorous really! --Guinnog 07:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Connolly's World Tour of Australia

No problem. It's always easier when the crux of an article is in place, of course. As for the episodes that still need written up: what are you doing today? ;) - Dudesleeper · Talk 11:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here.

CFC GF's

Yeah, the team lists probably don't need to go on the Carlton page. Since there is an article on the 1945 VFL Grand Final, I think grand finals can warrant their own wiki page - but they'd need a bit more info than just Carlton's team list (which could be hard for say, the 1906 premiership). R o gerthat ^Talk 01:38, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your image

Wikipedia cannot accept material that is declared to be "non-commercial use only" or "only for use on Wikipedia". Whilst it may seem reasonable to restrict material that way, Wikipedia content is syndicated around the world on the internet and in print, frequently for commercial purposes. Non-commercial or Wikipedia-only content is therefore useless to us. For that reason, such content is marked for speedy deletion automatically and deleted shortly after. For more information, you can visit this page. REDVERS ↔ SЯEVDEЯ 15:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From the FAQ linked from the article edit summary, the deletion summary, my talk page and in the above message: This is a list of licences that can should choose from; and this is a page with detail on how to get permission to use an image and how to prove you've got permission. Hope this helps. REDVERS ↔ SЯEVDEЯ 16:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Freespace2 shivan.png

Hello, Orichalcon. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Freespace2 shivan.png) was found at the following location: User:Orichalcon. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Junoreactor shango.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Junoreactor shango.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Freespace2 shivan.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Freespace2 shivan.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:52, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Billy connolly world tour of australia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Billy connolly world tour of australia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fevprofile.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Fevprofile.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fevprofilelarge.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Fevprofilelarge.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Billyconnollywtoabrett.PNG}

Thank you for uploading Image:Billyconnollywtoabrett.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Billyconnollywtoasydney.PNG}

Thank you for uploading Image:Billyconnollywtoasydney.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Antipodes

I know it was a long, long, long time ago, but your comment on the Perth Talk page about the antipodes of Perth being New Mexico, not the Bahamas was wrong. 115E is opposite 65W, not 115W, as it starts from 0 and increases in both directions, hence you need to subtract your longitude from 180 to find the antipode... think of Paris at about 5E... opposite is 175W, not 5W! The-Pope (talk) 14:25, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Orichalcon! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Matthew Rosa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The-chemist-wolves-howls-ep-cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The-chemist-wolves-howls-ep-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:30, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Billyconnollykingsparkperth.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Billyconnollykingsparkperth.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:40, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perth meetup

	Perth Meetup v t e Next: 11 January 2025 (watch) Last: 15 December 2024
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

There is a meetup happening this weekend in Perth, if you're interested. (You're in Category:Wikipedians in Perth.) — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 07:55, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Thechemist-bandpicture.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Thechemist-bandpicture.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fish ^Barking? 22:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Australiansteatoda.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:33, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Orichalcon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Orichalcon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]