User talk:Orentbyte

Welcome!

Hello, Orentbyte! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 04:08, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2015

Hello, I'm Jaellee. Your recent edit to the page Julian Draxler appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The infobox lists the appearances and goals for the domestic league only as you can read at the bottom of the infobox.

When you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter. This shows when the stats were last updated and prevents editors from accidentally updating the stats again. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 21:41, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested input

Hello, I frequently see you contribute to articles listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture and would very much appreciate your input on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture#Eradication of variety show sections so that a conclusion towards variety show appearances can be made. Thanks. Abdotorg (talk) 19:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Orentbyte. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Your continued disruptive edits regarding the separation between different language studio albums have been continually reverted, and there is clearly consensus against your changes. You have continued to be disruptive regardless. This simply will not be tolerated. ℯ xplicit 03:44, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Orentbyte. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Subheaders

Please do not remove language specific subheaders in discography's. This will get you banned.--Lirim | Talk 05:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hey Orentbyte if you see something you think is wrong please take it up on the talk page first to verify that you are correct BEFORE making multiple edits to an article. As a general rule for any article on wikipedia ofc, but I'm telling you this based on your recent edits to the BTS albums discography page. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 21:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Taeyeon discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Stop adding Korean peaks before the Gaon chart updates. Ss112 02:00, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at AKB48 discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 12:14, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Korea!

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Korea-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Korea? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Korea-related articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Bonnielou2013 (talk) 05:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discographies

Please stop merging albums which are in a different language, they are marketed at different audiences and are promoted as such, which you’re already aware of given that this a recurring theme with your edits as shown with messages above and previous discussions on other articles. Alex (talk) 12:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ə XPLICIT 01:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been told repeatedly not to make changes to the discographies as described above by Alexanderlee, yet you have continued to persist for months. Your refusal to get the point has led me to block you indefinitely for your constant disruption. If you can understand the problems with your edits and can show the will to work with the community and abide by consensus, you can request to be unblocked as outlined by the block template above. Ə XPLICIT 01:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: the main reason why i'm on wikipedia is want to help and improve wikipedia itself, and i give some my free time to go fix a things in wikipedia every day. so far i think i just trying to editing minor things, because i'm still newbie and still can't do much in here, you can check it your self about my contribution in wikipedia. with the time, i'll contributed more here as long i can and try to improve more article with the guide or example from other user. about my blocked status, now i understand why i'm being blocked. sometimes what i think right it's not actually right, and i will discussed first with other user before editing pages that maybe need to be change or remove from the article. in the future if my account unblocked i'll trying to very carefully when editing articles in wikipedia to not making disruptive edits. because, in the past it's not like i'm being silent, but i don't know how to response the talk pages, and i can't or not understand how to reply the message that other user give it to me. once again, please considering about my blocking status. thank you very much... Orentbyte 2:30 am, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orentbyte (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just trying to clean up wikipedia, i want to help to fix a things that i think it's right to do. If i'm wrong i'm sorry, and currently wikipedia is my daily site that i'm often visited everyday. I go to various article and fix a broken, or messed up things. I'm still new here, and still learning to understand how wikipedia works. about my blocked status, please unblock me for editing wikipedia. if you think i don't deserve to edit/clean up some pages it's okay, you can blocked me for editing that pages. but i want to you to open my blocked status for other pages. I still need to clean up minor error and some few a things. thank you very much :)

Decline reason:

This appeal does not demonstrate any understanding of why your edits were disruptive, nor does it explain how you will avoid such issues in the future. I am therefore declining your appeal. Please see the guide to appeals for information on how to appeal a block. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Orentbyte (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27363 was submitted on Oct 29, 2019 08:33:59. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request #2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orentbyte (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the main reason why i'm on wikipedia is want to help and improve wikipedia itself, and i give some my free time to go fix a things in wikipedia every day. so far i think i just trying to editing minor things, because i'm still newbie and still can't do much in here, you can check it your self about my contribution in wikipedia. with the time, i'll contributed more here as long i can and try to improve more article with the guide or example from other user. about my blocked status, now i understand why i'm being blocked. sometimes what i think right it's not actually right, and i will discussed first with other user before editing pages that maybe need to be change or remove from the article. in the future if my account unblocked i'll trying to very carefully when editing articles in wikipedia to not making disruptive edits. because, in the past it's not like i'm being silent, but i don't know how to response the talk pages, and i can't or not understand how reply the message that other user give it to me. for the admin, please considering again about my blocking status. thank you very much...

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 19:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request #3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orentbyte (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the reason why i'm on wikipedia is i really want to help and improve wikipedia, and i already give my free time to go fix a things in wikipedia every day. so far i just try to editing some minor things, because i'm still newbie and can't do much in here, you can check your self about all my contribution in wikipedia. with the time, i'll contributed more here as long i can and try to improve more article with the guide or example from other user. about my blocked status, now i understand why i'm being blocked. sometimes what i think right it's not actually right, and i will discussed first with other user before editing pages that maybe need to be change or remove from the article. in the future if my account unblocked i'll trying to very carefully when editing articles in wikipedia to not making disruptive edits. because, in the past i still learning, i don't know how to response the talk pages, and i am not understand how reply the message that other user give it to me. for the admin, please considering again about my blocking status. thank you very much...

Decline reason:

This is substantially the same unblock request you made previously. You were told to substantially reword your request, but as you have been unwilling to do so, and given your previous disruptive editing, I am declining your request on its merits (or lack thereof). Yamla (talk) 11:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.