User talk:OrenWiley

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, OrenWiley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Motives for the September 11 attacks does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Abhishek ^Talk 16:27, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Motives for the September 11 attacks. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 16:49, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While there may indeed have been an impression of an "invasion" of Saudi Arabia in some quarters, that should be left to a sourced discussion in the body of the section, not uttered in Wikipedia's editorial voice in the header. Acroterion (talk) 16:51, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 16:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the article's talkpage (see the tab labeled "discussion") for issues that concern you in the article. Please note that the "inferred motives" are sourced, not opinions of Wikipedia editors. Acroterion (talk) 17:01, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]