User talk:Optrajennifer

This is Optrajennifer's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhijeet Gholap Draft (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Currently still advert-toned so please focus with only the best in-depth third-party news sources overall you can find; please no interviews, press releases or trivial passing mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abhijeet Gholap Draft and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Optrajennifer, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Cordially, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:17, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia's five pillars • A tutorial • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments • Help desk • Teahouse • Help directory Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources • Topic notability What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • List of guidelines • Three-revert rule • Copyrights Image use policy • Policy for non-free content • Deletion policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Conflict of interest • Sock puppetry

Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation The perfect article • Peer review • Featured content
The community
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette Build consensus • Resolve disputes • No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump • Signpost • IRC channels
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages • Portals Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts Awards that registered contributors can achieve and award

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhijeet Gholap Draft (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abhijeet Gholap Draft and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah Alam (talk) 07:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Optrajennifer, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Abdullah Alam (talk) 07:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhijeet Gholap has been accepted

Abhijeet Gholap, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Abhijeet Gholap.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Abhijeet Gholap.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.optrascan.com/leadership-team.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Optrajennifer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Abhijeet Gholap, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 22:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Abhijeet Gholap ‎. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 00:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Optrajennifer. Your edits look as if you are being paid , such as the edit you made to Abhijeet Gholap ‎. Paid promotion is an especially egregious type of conflict of interest (COI)
Paid articles should be submitted through the articles for creation process. If you are receiving or expect to receive money for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post the disclosure on your user page at User:Optrajennifer. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Optrajennifer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}.
If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being paid, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.

Speedy deletion nomination of Abhijeet Gholap

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abhijeet Gholap, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 06:59, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 07:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi how to respond to the query i am not a paid editor

Kindly sign your posts by appending ~~~~ at the end of your posts.~ Winged Blades^Godric 08:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

Your username suggests an affiliation with the company OptraSCAN.
Your only edits are about the founder of said company, evidence of a single-purpose account.
There is off-wiki evidence that contradicts your assertion.

Please reconsider your response. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 07:57, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes like that yes i am an employee of the organisation i thought the meaning was i am taking money to write articles which is not the case. I believe Abhijeet Gholap has done good contributions to society and his biographic page should be there as people search him and want to know him online. I apologize for not disclosing this earlier as you rightly said this is a single purpose account. Please guide me as my orginal draft was deleted and i donot want to get blocked as a writer shall i post the same draft that was accepted in 2016?

Also i am ready to disclose employer, client, and affiliation if that is required kindly guide me how to do this.

~~~~ Optrajennifer (talk) 14:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should still declare yourself as a paid editor, since you are an employee of this company. We have no way of knowing for sure if you are editing while you are on the job, or on your own time. Please look at the {{paid}} template and place it on your userpage (User:Optrajennifer).

Doing this will demonstrate that you are being transparent about your affiliation to the company, and give assurances to other editors that you are editing in good faith. By making this disclosure, you will find others more willing to help you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot sure will do that. Please check my draft as I have now added {{paid}} template. What shall i do so that my article will get published fast. ~~~~ Optrajennifer (talk)

Confirming that Optrajennifer has put the PAID template on her page and on the Talk page of the draft article about Gholap. David notMD (talk) 11:00, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moved your speedy-delete article to Draft:Abhijeet Gholap

Please note new location of your content so you can improve it rather than it being deleted. MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i now see that my article is deleted. Please help ~~ Please help me here, my Wikipedia page is been deleted. The changes have been done in the content. I would appreciate if you could review the draft and help me in publishing it.Optrajennifer (talk) 11:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted - it is in draft. You have time to work on it. It appears when you search on Draft:Abhijeet Gholap. I shortened it a bit to make it read less promotional. I recommend that before you submit it to Articles for Creation (which means that it will be reviewed by an Administrator before being published, a process that can take weeks), you improve all of the references, as the format is wrong. Minimally, what you need is three valid, independent references about Abhi's film career. Not interviews, not blogs, not his own or his company website, not just passing mention of him or companies. Good luck. David notMD (talk) 10:50, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non COI editing

Jennifer, Do you plan on editing on any subjects not related to your employer? Toddst1 (talk) 13:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi currently i do not plan on editing on any other subjects not related to my employer. But i may wish to do that in future ~~Optrajennifer(talk)

The subject of your article is non-notable by our standards and no amount of editing on your/our's part is going to change the same.So basically, if you can't choose one of our few million other articles to improve, I'm afraid you do not have a good future over here.~ Winged Blades^Godric 11:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your suggestion. Subject Mr. Abhijeet Gholap is a Indian National award winning film producer (reference quoted in the draft). He is also a successful entrepreneur and is founder of Optra Ventures that consist of OptraSCAN which is part of Cancer MoonShot 2020 project.

https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/2999965,https://www.360dx.com/business-news/optrascans-demand-service-may-make-digital-pathology-more-affordable#.WrNAeOhubcc, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161018005285/en/NantOmics-Launches-Augmented-Intelligence-Program-On-Demand-Digital

Kindly help me to understand Wikipedia standards ~Optrajennifer(talk)

See my note in the earlier section. David notMD (talk) 10:50, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will add that after trying to look at some of the references, revisit all of them. Some are now dead. Others are nothing more than a mention that Gholap was a producer on a film. What you need are references that are either about Gholap or contain several paragraphs about Gholap. Quality of referencing is more important than quantity. David notMD (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]