User talk:Optimaessentials

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Haplos (TV series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Haplos (TV series) was changed by Optimaessentials (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955383 on 2018-08-22T15:57:33+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kiel Ortega

Dear Optimaessentials, I have reviewed the new article for Kiel Ortega and I do not think it meets Wikipeida's criteria for an article that should be in main space. This is an article about a living person that lacks WP:BLP elements, such as sufficient citations to verify independently what has been stated. As per your comment earlier, I do not doubt that he exists - the article is lacking formally to establish notability. I have therefore moved it back to draft space. Pls do not recreate in main space unless the article can be a) properly sources and b) shows notability using reliable independent sources. Thanks. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 09:24, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kiel Ortega moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kiel Ortega, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 09:33, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiel Ortega (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Z0 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kiel Ortega and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kiel Ortega, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The editor whose username is Z0 10:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Optimaessentials! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The editor whose username is Z0 10:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Optimaessentials", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it suggests a connection with a commercial product. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Deb (talk) 07:18, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kiel Ortega moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kiel Ortega, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kiel Ortega

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kiel Ortega, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 16:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]