User talk:OpieNn

Revert Warning: Goguryeo-China wars

Hello, I restored my version. See Talk:Goguryeo-China wars. I think it's currently the best way.
If you know more about Tang's campaigns or Sui campaigns, you can expand the article. When the article will be big enough (too big), we will be able to divide it in several articles.
Anyway, thanks for your comment which "Fair play" (explaning why you did something) Yug (talk) 19:33, 26 December 2006 (UTC) [sorry for english mistakes][reply]

Thanks for your comment on my page, but I strongly disagree with your renaming. The later Tang-Silla invasions of Baekje-Goguryeo is really a separate war. It doesn't make sense, because if you call it Goguryeo-China Wars, the article should include all wars between Goguryeo and China, including the wars against the Four Han Colonies, all the way through Goguryeo's fall. The article as-is, is not about that, it's really about the war between Goguryeo and the Sui Dynasty, which itself is a major, specific topic that should have its own article. If you wants to create another article on the Tang-Silla invasions of Baekje-Goguryeo, that's fine with me, but don't hijack an existing article on a different topic. Thanks.OpieNn 19:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From what I know, my choice is the best one : it's one idea => the Chinese will to submit/conquest Goguryeo.

I also suspect that Pro-Korean users may prefer divide in 2 articles to show one beautifull article "Goguryeo-Sui wars" where Korean people is amazingly strong with a final victory. And want to hide the defeat of 668.

The "Cambridge history of China" doesn't seem to say that the Sui's wars/campaigns (598,612,613,614) are different from the Tang's wars/campaigns (645,661,667,668).

What are your sources ? What is your school studies ? The fact that you are a new user (4 edits) doesn't help me to trust what you said or what you will say.

Yug (talk) 19:59, 26 December 2006 (UTC) [Doing what I think good][reply]

I ask it again : What are your sources ? What is your studies ? Yug (talk) 16:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As of 22:53, 20 January 2007 (UTC), you still haven't provide your source to explain your controversial edits. --Yug (talk) 22:53, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert warning

Please do not engage in edit wars over wording and content on the Japan-Korea relations. You are very close to violating the three revert rule. Please discuss any changes you wish to make on the talk page, especially if the changes may be controversial. You may also try following the steps for resolving disputes as they are very useful in resolving disputes between editors working in good faith. We appreciate your assistance in maintaining a good editing atmosphere on Wikipedia. Thank you. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 23:24, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

I sent the admin following message:

Subject: Vandalism

There is a vandalism going on.

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Comfort_women

Most of the discussion is normal, but the ID OpieNn is a habitual reverter. Stop him reverting.

Ikeda, Nobuo, Ph.D Ikedanobuo 15:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea-Russia relations

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for writing this article. Unfortunately it doesn't conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles. However, please do not be disheartened by what may happen to your first article, if indeed it is deleted. Please continue to edit Wikipedia and add articles which conform with the inclusion criteria. For help, see Help:Contents. To find out what will probably be deleted, see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Thanks, and if you have any questions, please ask them on my user talk page. To do this, click on my name (just after this sentence) and click discussion at the top and then the (+) button at the top. thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 18:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Japan-Korea relations

Hey, I see that you created the relations template! Congradulations! I want to let you know that on the Japan-Korea relations article, I intend as much as possible to cooperate & include all of your edits as possible. See ya. (Wikimachine 23:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Revert warning: Sea of Japan

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Sea of Japan. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Endroit 08:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]