User talk:Ophl1

Welcome!

Hello, Ophl1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McSly (talk) 03:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Intelligent design without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tgeorgescu (talk) 23:49, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Recent edit to Milon's Secret Castle

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Milon's Secret Castle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 00:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop and read this

In order to edit Wikipedia, you have to read WP:RS and WP:VER. Not everything written on the internet is a reliable source. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ophl1. It looks like you're trying to contribute sales figures to video game articles. That's terrific, and I hope you continue your work! I'm hoping I can help you navigate some of our policies on wikipedia, as a new editor, so you can start contributing awesome content that will stick around in our articles for a long time. One of our core policies is WP:V, which basically says that content needs to backed up by what's called a reliable source. You should glance over that page (WP:RS). I know it's long, but the gist is that there are certain types of sources that we consider particularly reliable, and other sources which are not reliable. Generally, wordpress blogs and open wikis (like wikipedia) are not reliable sources, so can't be used to back up new content. Does that make sense? Let me know if you have any questions; I'd be happy to answer them! All the best, — Jess· Δ ♥ 02:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ophl1, you're unfortunately still edit warring on Milon's Secret Castle and other articles. You need to stop reverting other editors and go to the talk page to discuss your changes. Click on the "Talk" link at the top left of the page and start discussing your proposal with others. Thank you. — Jess· Δ ♥ 22:22, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm The1337gamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mother (video game), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 21:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Original analysis

You have to be careful when making edits of this nature, since it appears to be based on your own interpretation of what things mean. Assuming that the game will not be released just becaused it was delisted on another console can be called original analysis, which is not permitted. The only thing, honestly, that would get this removed is if Nintendo releases a statement saying either (1) that the game is not launching or (2) they are discontinuing all Virtual Console support for Wii U with no further releases for any platform. Feel free to discuss on the article's talk page, if you wish. --McDoob AU93 19:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carla Witt

The article Carla Witt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 02:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carla Witt

The article Carla Witt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 08:10, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Heather Kafka

The article Heather Kafka has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Morphdog^{what did I do now?} 03:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carla Witt

The article Carla Witt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ophl1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]