User talk:Opark 77/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Welcome!

Howdy, Opark 77/Archive 1, Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions, you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions goto Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ, if you can't find your answer there check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.

---

Additional tips

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

• For Wikipedia policies and guidelines see The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia is not.
• Find everything in the Directory.
• If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
• Introduce yourself at the new user log.
• If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
• If you have edits from before creating an account try this.
• To Upload Images with the correct Copyright tags.
• Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Be Bold!!

You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

Joe I 07:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Bulk Edits

Hey Opark77, I've been looking over your contributions to the Sopranos and there is something you might want to consider. Instead of making lots of small edits, it's preferrable (but not required) to do them all at once so people do not have to load and look at so many edits. Also, if you are doing a minor edit, check off the minor edit box at the bottom left of the text box. It saves others time by letting them pass over your edit and focus on more substantial edits. Also, please sign you posts in user and talk pages by clicking the signiture icon at the top of the text box or using two dashes and four tildes. --Orion Minor 15:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice Orion - I'll give the sig a shot now!--Opark 77 16:37, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Zarbon

I have filed a request for comment here and I would appreciate your support, as another editor who has tried to reason with him and failed. Kafziel 04:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I have added my summary of my interactions with Zarbon and endorsed the overall summary. I hope this helps, what will come out of this request for comment? Or what do you hope will result? --Opark 77 10:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry it took me so long to reply; I accidentally took your name off my watchlist so I didn't see your question. The intended result of a request for comment is to bring the problem to the attention of the whole community, rather than just the few people interested in editing a particular page. The intent is usually to demonstrate that other editors share your opinion of the problem (that you're not just being mean or crazy), and often that is enough to give the other editor some perspective. If the problem is not solved there, it will go on to a request for arbitration, which usually results in the user being blocked or permanently banned. Fortunately, it looks like that will not be necessary here, so the request for comment has served its purpose. It's always better when we can all get along. Thanks for your help and support, and good luck in your future work. Kafziel 18:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Kafziel, no worries about slow reply.--Opark 77 18:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

And thank you Opark, couldn't have done it without you. It was really a good team effort between me, you, WesleyMullins and anyone else who contributed. If you're a Six Feet Under fan please do not hesitate to help me with that episode guide. I have done like 6 episodes already. Once again, thank you for your help. Sfufan2005 19:43, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm ashamed to say I've never seen a whole one. I watched 10 minutes of a season 3 episode decided I liked it but wanted to see it from the beginning. I do have the first series on the shelf as of 2 weeks ago. I missed it when it started on TV here in the UK and I've been waiting ages for a friend to buy it so I can watch it from the start! --Opark 77 20:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

inuse template

Seeing that you are doing a lot of work on The Wire's pages, you may want to use the inuse template. Wikipedia:Edit lock it's good for preventing edit conflicts. Without it if you are doing a half hour edit, someone else coming along and fixing a minor typo could mess up the whole job. For the same reason, I'll stay off the wire pages for a day or so to let you work.JeffStickney

Thanks for the advice Jeff. I'll try to remember to use it. --Opark 77 20:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Sopranos

Hi Opark77, thanks for the heads up on that Sopranos entry. I see you put back in the entry in Luxury Lounge (The Sopranos episode) regarding Artie and his cookbook. If you look at the recepie Artie is using, its "rabbit" in Italian; and he pulls out a skinned rabbit from the fridge to cook it; his wife warns him that most people don't like rabbit. This is referring to the rabbit he is shooting at in his garden; so I thought that all of these items should be linked in the summary. Lgreen 22:30, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

The clubber lang reference was spam. That was Mr. T's character in Rocky III

--MistaTee 16:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

I had the feeling it was some kind of spam but couldn't place the name. I've seen the Rocky films all once each and that was one time too many for in the case of all but the first! --Opark 77 17:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Miscellanea

Bother! You're correct, now I have to change them all. I prefer miscellanea to trivia because trivia is stuff that's not worth bothering with, and hence has no place in an encyclopedia. Rich Farmbrough 13:04 6 June 2006 (UTC).

Big Love

Opark77, if you are into episode summaries of "big love", I will assist. I know its a lot of work and no one has taken up the challenge, just wanted to say I'd help out if you took the lead. Good work on the Sopranos. Lgreen 06:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your compliment. I'm working on The Wire at the moment but I do hope to get some Big Love episode pages done too and will be glad to have someone to tidy up my shoddy work when I get there! --Opark 77 08:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

The Wire

Thanks! I'm not really interested in writing episode summaries as I'm more of a wikifairy, but I can copyedit others' works. 69.116.150.174 18:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Hey Opark, I noticed you've been writing a lot of episode summaries. I'll go through and work on them all. 69.116.150.174 03:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Little Paulie Germani Mitchell Burgess Dominic Chianese Dan Attias Tony Sirico Steve Shill Vincent Pastore Bada Bing Nancy Marchand Tim Van Patten Dan Grimaldi Alex Rocco Mario Puzo Talia Shire Edie Falco John Ventimiglia George Eads Brian Bloom Allen Coulter

Cleanup Jordan wood Jessica Darlin Consigliere Merge Richie Aprile The Finale (Everybody Loves Raymond) List of Everybody Loves Raymond episodes (Seasons 5-9) Add Sources Tasha Yar J. Craig Wright Criss Angel Mindfreak Wikify Christine Cavanaugh Nikolai Stanislofsky Enter The Fungus Expand Triumph (episode of Rome) Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Tulip Era in the Ottoman Empire

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this barnstar for your amazing work in articles related to The Wire. Please keep up the good work and happy editing! east.718 23:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Opark 77, just a note: when you're making a large edit to an article, it's preferable to put an {{inuse}} tag on the article, save it, and then edit and save again. It prevents the history from getting filled up with your edits.

Thanks! east.718 17:24, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Lester Freamon

Thanks for all your contributions to The Wire articles! I do want to know, though, where you found the information that Lester is 30. I always assumed that he was at least 45-50 if not older. And his thirteen years (and four months) spent in the panwshop unit seem to go against him being so young. P.S. Here's the Wire fan userbox: {{User:UBX/Wire}} Andrew Levine 11:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Response on Wire talk

I've left a response on Talk:The Wire (TV series). Andrew Levine 13:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for your kind compliment on Big Love about the family tree--it was a real pain in the ass to make, since it was my first time. If you are ever interested, here is the info on it: Template_talk:Familytree I look forward to your future edits! Travb (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Page references for The Wire: Truth Be Told

I think that every inidvidual citation to the Truth Be Told book needs a page reference to go with it. My copy is unfortunately at home in the U.S. (and I am in France for another month). You seem to have it on hand, though. Could you add the page numbers? Thanks. Andrew Levine 13:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the page references, I will go about adding them myself. As for the peer review, it's really not that odd; there are many articles up for peer review at a given time, and with limited attention directed towards them, some of the longer reads attract few or no comments. I recommend we leave it up for at least a full week, and maybe two, before bringing it to FAC. Andrew Levine 14:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

The Wire (TV series) Featured Article Candidacy

The page has been stable for almost a week, the peer review has run its course. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Wire (TV series). Andrew Levine 11:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Dennis Mello

Your recent edit to Dennis Mello (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 07:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

The Wire's TOC

No problem Opark, and thanks for the kind comments. east.718 21:48, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

The Fleshy Part of the Thigh

I have moved The Fleshy Part of the Thigh back to The Fleshy Part of the Thigh (The Sopranos episode). Rather than for purposes of disambiguation the individual episode articles are titled with the show name as per guidelines from the wikiproject:television page. I just wanted to leave a quick note to explain why I moved it back.--Opark 77 07:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Ahh, yes, I see. Thanks for letting me know :-) —Mets501 (talk) 12:38, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Lost characters

Thanks for your message. While I don't mind doing the odd copy edit, I'm purposefully trying to take a back seat from the article while season two transmits in the UK (currently, the last episode aired was "Dave"). As I stated on the Talk page, I think the list was better, since any spoilers were left to the individual character pages, rather than the main article. However, I think the rest of the article is shaping up pretty well. I've just copy edited the "Episode structure" section, as it contained info that was either duplicated elsewhere in the article, or pertained to TV shows in general and wasn't notable enough. Chris 42 14:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

RE: Lost (TV series)

Hi Owen,

It's already been removed. I only just noticed that someone else already uploaded the same image; it's been replaced with that. Feel free to put the image up for deletion, or whatever. SergeantBolt 01:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: image

Not to be annjoying, but isn't that the uploader's responsibility? -- Wikipedical 02:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Namond Brice

Hi Owen, In "The Wire: Connected," which aired on HBO last Sunday, they introduced the school-age characters and there were a couple of good tidbits about them in there. Namond is the son of Wee-Bey and was seen visiting him in jail. They revealed some bits about some of the other characters as well, but I didn't connect the names. One is a foster child with a mind for business (I think that was Randy but I'm not sure), one is living in a really desperate situation and is good with computers (pretty sure it was DuQuan), and the third is the quiet one, and the de facto "leader" of the group. At least three, maybe all four of them, are boxers in Cutty's gym.

Hope this helps! Can't wait for the new season.

J.P.

Lost

I thought that it would be more organised this way so you could clearly see the subheadings at the top of the page in the list but clearly you disagree so I will change it back. -- Sarz 00:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

image:Pilot2backgammon.jpg

Hello: please re-examine the information for the image you tagged. The image is clearly listed under the Screenshot fairuse template ("This image is a screenshot of a copyrighted television program...") and provides the source in the description: "John Locke (played by Terry O'Quinn) holds up the two opposing colors of backgammon checkers in part two of the pilot episode of Lost." This is used in the Lost article to illustrate the thematic element of the colors "black and white", and thus the image falls well within the realm of critical commentary. --Leflyman^Talk 17:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• With all due respect, please stop annoying me by re-inserting inaccurate tags and filling my talk page with excess template text. The image you have tagged was already examined by an admin, and returned. See additional discussion at Awyong_Jeffrey_Mordecai_Salleh's talk page. If you feel that the image is still lacking what you deem enough "Fair Use rationale" please be ever so good to add it yourself based on the extensive discussion already made. It's a wiki; you can edit the images, too. --Leflyman^Talk 17:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

• Opark, please take this with due consideration, I'm sure you consider it "improving the article" to remove images, but I consider it a failure to understand some basic Wikipedia principles. Rather than tagging images you deem not to meet your standards for fair use, perhaps you might consider focusing on actual editing of article in areas you're familiar with. It's clear that the images chosen are discussed in the text, and that the images are identified as to their source. If you feel that's not enough, I'll again suggest: add the missing info yourself. Incidentally, you might want to note that I'm been editing on Wikipedia since 2003. I'm well familiar with policy; stating "Please remember that we assume good faith here at wikipedia" comes off as pedantic. (You may want to note that WP:AGF points out, "Accusing the other side in a conflict of failing to assuming good faith can, itself, be a form of failing to assume good faith.") Finally, users are given leeway in editing their own talk pages, and allowed to remove comments they feel are inappropriate. Users are advised not to remove warnings without cause, as this may be seen as uncivil; however, the excessive template you placed on my page was not such a case. Removing it was most certainly not vandalism, and your claim as such seems to indicate some misunderstanding of policy.

Please See: Help:Talk_page#User_talk_pages:

"Most users treat their user talk pages like regular talk pages, and archive the contents periodically to a personal subpage — either when the page gets too large, on a regular schedule, or when they take a wikivacation. Others delete comments after they have responded to them." --Leflyman^Talk 21:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I hope you don't mind me commenting here. I switched the tag from no source to orphaned fair use on this image a while ago and noticed this discussion when I was following up. According to Wikipedia's fair use policy, criterion 10, images claiming fair use must contain article-specific fair use rationale. It is the responsibility of the uploader or those placing the image in articles to provide the rationale, as they are the ones claiming that the image is protected under fair use. As with all images that do not comply with the fair use policy, if an image claiming fair use does not contain fair use rationale 7 days after the uploader has been notified (since this image was uploaded before 13 July 2006), it may be deleted without further warning. Feel free to contact me on my talk page if you have any questions. Pagrashtak 23:20, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

(replying to message on my talk page) - You're welcome.  :) I like the expanded rationale that you added, too. If there are any other Lost-related images that you'd like assistance with, let me know, and I'll be happy to take a look. --Elonka 08:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

One Arrest (The Wire episode)

There's a problem with the "Title Reference" section that I can't exactly figure out. Though the name of the episode is "one arrest" there are two arrests by the case squad during the episode. One is of Bird and one is of Kevin Johnston, the one eyed drug runner. Either there is a philosophical reasoning for this or it's a screw up. –– Lid^(Talk) 10:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Technically, as the creators would know, it's irrelevent if they released Johnston as the arrest applies only to the inital arrest. Anything after that is being released from custody. In addition to that, seeing as he was being cuffed, resisting arrest, and carrying a large amount of product, he would had to have co-operated of his own free will to be released but I can tell you he wasn't as he had seen the entire case squad and their dealings. It's actually probably a plothole as to what happened to him, considering we see later on that you can easily make phone calls from prison to snitch, so the One Arrest title is one big confusing fuck. If we can find a David Simon quote on this it would be appropriate. –– Lid^(Talk) 14:37, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Also I added the Docks to Template:TheWire as well as added the freak disappearance of Frank Barlow from the series in The Target Miscellanea. –– Lid^(Talk) 15:27, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Pilot2backgammon.jpg

Sorry for the late reply. I saw your message this morning but was busy in school the entire day and could only take a look at the article and the image in question just now. It appears that you have given Image:Pilot2backgammon.jpg an accurate fair use rationale. And it does illustrate the black-and-white theme section appropriately. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Lost mediation

The Zen Garden Award for Infinite Patience is awarded to you for extraordinary patience and perseverance in achieving a successful unanimous resolution to Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Lost episodes. Thatcher131 04:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Lost WikiProject Newsletter - Edition 1

 SergeantBolt (t,c) 21:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Not lost on me

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		While I was mired in a remote corner of the Lost article, you were doing some heavy lifting, unperturbed. Your shaping of the article in August and September was visible all the way over to where I was standing. I remember, Owen. Loqi T. 08:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

You might be interested to know that much of the turmoil of those days is evaporating away. But then again, you didn't seem to notice it; you just got down to business. Anyway, good work on Lost. During my time there, your contributions stuck with me the most. --Loqi T. 08:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Consensus gathering at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)

Hello. Thank you for offering your opinion and "vote" to Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#Episode Article Naming conventions!

We notice that there may have been confusing in collecting the opinions of yourselves and others. Thus, we would appreciate it if you took the time to voting again at the poll. Please choose "#Support" or "#Oppose" for the first option. Additionally, you may also make a completely separate vote for which disambiguation title with be used.

For example, you may vote to oppose the first policy and then support the convention that articles have the disambiguation suffix "(<series> episode)" appended to their name. We apologize for the inconvience and complexity. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 21:55, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

List of The Sopranos episodes

It made FL status! Good cooperation helped make it so. Thank you. Cliff smith 00:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your contribution. Qjuad 13:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Can you email me?

jwales@wikia.com --Jimbo Wales 03:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Attack on The Wire episodes

FYI, there's a group of editors that are working their way through Wikipedia, disrupting category after category of television episodes. Their next target is The Wire, which episodes I see that you created. I wanted to let you know, in case you wanted to weigh in at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#Proposed moves for episodes of The Wire. --Elonka 23:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

The Wire subheadings

Sounds good, thanks for fixing it. I didn't realize that consensus had been reached, and I had never seen anything like that in other articles, though I should have suspected the special formatting had been put there for a reason. Thebogusman 21:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

I have just re-watched the episode in which Bodie was murdered, and it clearly shows that it was Michael doing the shooting. You might want to revert that change.Arcayne 20:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

The Sopranos

Perhaps you and I can work together to make the Sopranos a GA or even an FA. It definitely deserves a better article. Aaron Bowen 13:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Great I'll start working on it tomorrow and start by getting it sourced. Aaron Bowen 01:35, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

I can't find any evidence on the internet so far that the pilot was ever developed for FOX or turned down by them. Odd. I did some work on the article and will add more sources. Aaron Bowen 09:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Oy I can bareky read this, hey I've done some on the Sopranos it's getting there (still awful but less so) have a look. Aaron Bowen 16:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 08:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}

Commendation

Hey, I didn't know where else to put this, but...just wanted to thank you for your fantastic episode summaries on The Wire. I rely on them heavily to understand the plot after each episode. As smart as I'd like to think I am, I don't always catch what they're saying or the implications of it. It's all very thorough and well-done. Many thanks.

Lockeownzj00 21:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

List of The Wire episodes images.

An editor is removing all the images from List of The Wire episodes for lack of fair use rationals, see here. I noticed that you had been adding rationals to some of the images, and thought you should know. - Peregrine Fisher 16:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem, you're doing an excellent job. I must say that List of The Wire episodes is one of the best LOEs I've seen. The Wire articles are all really well done. If you're interested, a discussion happened concurrently with the removal at Wikipedia talk:Fair use#Screenshots .282.29. The threat of removal is over for now, but it's kind of interesting. Every month or so the editor who removed the images tries to do it to another LOE, a big discussion takes place with no results, and then things die down. - Peregrine Fisher 23:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

From the message on your talk page I have posted my opinion on the situation on the talk page of the Wire episodes list. –– Lid^(Talk) 03:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey just a quick note to thank u for the time taken to take a look at the article :)--Nighthawkzx 03:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the assessments...

...it really means a lot :D. Tinkleheimer 07:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: World's Wildest Police Videos Article assessment

Thanks for the rating - • The Giant Puffin • 09:17, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Assessments

Great work on the assessments. I'm very happy to see that I'm not the only one who thinks that this is an important task in WP:TV. I'm currently still a tad occupied with deleting as many show-specific templates as I can, but I hope I can start helping you very soon. I think so far your assessment comments have been of truly great quality --TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 18:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Thunderbirds assessment

Hi. Thanks for your comments on the Thunderbirds page. You make some excellent suggestions. Thanks again. Bobfos 21:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Tenacious D

Thanks for the assessment. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 11:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Samurai Jack

Thanks for the assessment. I'll work on making some improvements soon. Hewinsj 16:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Your talk page

Opark, the formatting on your talk page seemed broken, so I went ahead and fixed it for you. east.718 17:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks East :) --Opark 77 20:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sopranos Tracee.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopranos Tracee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations

Many thanks for your amzing work on The Wire!!!!! I'd never heard of it in the UK and each episode and characters has fine detail!! Superb stuff!!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 18:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Ah thats cool. It looks great. Welcome back. Hey are you into Kojak at all . That page is terrible and could do with some magic treatment!!! A pal of mine has polished the A-Team page ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 10:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Great - I'm not so much into it either but from what I've seen its quite good. Of coourse Telly Savalas tried to play me in On Her Majesty's Secret Service (film)!!! in 1969. Its just the content seemed very inadequate let alone the style of writing. Some series have far better articles and more info on each of the episodes that some entire series articles on wikipedia!!! Thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 11:39, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sopranos Annalisa Zucca.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sopranos Annalisa Zucca.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:14, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Scrubs

I noticed you just did the ratings for the scrubs article, i was wondering what the articles needs to take it up to GA status. Thanks --Jac16888 11:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Article assessment - I'll See You in Court

Thank you very much, I will definitely be taking you up on the suggestions! Cheers, CP 16:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

FAC

Hi, the discussion to promote Pilot (Smallville) was closed, so I placed your comment on its talk page instead. Hope you don't mind. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 11:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

No worries. I didn't get a chance to throw in my towel, either -- I know the editor who worked on the article, and he's produced some great work, like the recently-promoted Jason Voorhees. Kind of feel bad that I didn't get to lend my support to either. :-P —Erik (talk • contrib) - 11:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry fellas, but feel free to copy edit both articles...as no FA is ever "perfect". Thanks for the support Opark.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 13:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

FAC Carnivàle

Thank you very much for your copyedit and your comments at the FAC. I have addressed your concerns, which included writing a completely new section out of nothing. Although I have copyedited this section several times now, would you mind proofreading Carnivàle#Cast again, just in case? Thank you. :-) – sgeureka ^t•c 16:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

I don't know how, but the article was promoted today. The hardest part was getting a copyeditor, and since you were the only copyeditor (other than User:Tony1 who helped with partial copyediting), I'll express my gratitude with this barnstar. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		Thanks for the big help in the Carnivàle FAC. – sgeureka t•c 08:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Novels assessment

Just happened to be there - Cheers :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 14:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey there

I noticed you're back, are you interested in collaborating again to get another article to FA? I'm down for almost anything related to TV, rap, MMA or boxing. Cheers! east.718 at 15:32, September 17, 2007

I sent The Wire's LoE to WP:FLC a while back... then realized that I'd written only half of the summaries and summarily withdrew the nomination... guess that's what happens when you edit on a sleep deficit. I don't want to write too much for it as it's just boring plot summary, but I could copyedit for you. Alternatively, we could just tackle something like Oz together... it'll be an interesting challenge because the current article is subpar and I expect there to be a dearth of third-party sources. east.718 at 15:50, September 17, 2007

GA pass for Victoria Wood As Seen On TV

Congratulations. An article you contributed significantly to has been awarded Good Article status. You may wish to copy the following template: {{User Good Article|Victoria Wood As Seen On TV}} and paste it to somewhere suitable (such as your user page).

It will produce the following userbox

This user helped promote Victoria Wood As Seen On TV to good article status.

and add you to the category "Good Article contributors".

Well done! EyeSerene^TALK 14:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Brotherhood

Sorry - maybe the tag was a bit over the top - I didn't look to see how long the article had been there or how much it had been revised, but when I started looking at it I found so many errors and problems with the way it's expressed that I added the tag. I'll look at it again and see if I can soften it. Didn't mean to target any one editor - if you're the only one doing most of the work on it, I apologize for coming off harshly. It does need a lot of work, though. I'll try to help. Tvoz |talk 17:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:The Corner cover.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:The Corner cover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 13:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

2001 and a Bit

I notice that you do not think that the Goodies' episode page has enough information. Could you please tell me what you think is wrong with it, and in what way you personally feel that the article can be improved. Thank you. As I have already added references to the page, I do not understand why they are not considered good enough. Figaro 20:45, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Sopranos FA

Hello! I've begun rebuilding the Sopranos article from scratch, more or less. I'm thinking about modeling it after the The Wire and Carnivàle articles. I've saved what I've written so far in my sandbox. It's not much so far but see how it looks to you. Grammar and sentence structure is a big issue since english is not my first language. Anyway, let's make this thing happen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkyvoltron (talk • contribs) 01:27, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Whoops, I forgot to sign. That's embarrassing. Here you go. –FunkyVoltron ^talk 01:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sopranos Gigi Cestone.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopranos Gigi Cestone.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sopranos Ronald Zellman.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopranos Ronald Zellman.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sopranos Valery.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopranos Valery.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

FAC Trapped in the Closet

• Myself and at least two other editors have addressed most of the helpful suggestions you had raised at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Trapped in the Closet (South Park), and at least one other editor so far that had at first had a "Weak oppose" has changed their sentiment to "Neutral." Might I trouble you to take a second look? Thanks for your help. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 22:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC).

List of Carnivàle episodes

Hi. You just just caused me a major edit conflict at the Carnivàle ep list. ;-) Anyway, I have just made my final pass on the list and want to take it to WP:FLC very soon, possibly tomorrow. I have asked another eager Carni fan to read over the summaries just to make sure I have not left any grammar mistakes, but six eyes are always better than four. So if you want to read over the article again or leave some other suggestions before the Featured reviewers slap me on the wrist, it can't hurt and certainly is appreciated. I feel this article has everything that a Featured List needs, but I feel I'm a little to close to the subject and need independant input for whether the copyrighted image at the top adds anything to the list or should be removed, and whether the individual plot summary <ref>s that you have added (thanks!) should use the "url" parameter to link to the ep summaries of the HBO website. – sgeureka ^t•c 23:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

I really should have used {{inuse}} but this was in fact my first edit conflict in over three months of editing Carnivàle articles, so I didn't even think about it in the first place. :-) But I have added a second reference for the plot summaries now per your suggestion. I'll wait with the FLC a few more days or until I'm sure that the list has received an independent check, whichever comes first. – sgeureka ^t•c 18:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I had another pass on the list and felt positive to go to FLC now. See Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Carnivàle episodes. If you still find the time to go over the list again, please do so. :-) – sgeureka ^t•c 10:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I started with rewatching episode 1 yesterday, but I think I'll watch a couple of other shows before I really continue with Carnivàle again. :-) – sgeureka ^t•c 21:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Commission

Thanks a lot for your note there! I suspect you're right about a sort of systemic bias in the creation of articles about specific shows and networks rather than the general concepts and processes underlying broadcasting that is created because fans and enthusiasts are more likely to write articles than industry insiders. I left a note at the BBC WikiProject as I know some of the people there work inside the BBC...hopefully someone else will have some ideas! TheGrappler 17:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

(Incidentally, I thought it rather weird that several people have Wikipedia entries purely because they work as commissioning editors and are therefore considered major media figures, notable enough for an article...but nobody thought the role of commissioning editor itself was worth making an article for! If no new ideas come forward I will look up a few commissioning editor bios and drop notes to the people who wrote them; I guess someone who writes biographical articles about commissioning editors is a better-than-average bet to know what a commissioning editor actually does!) TheGrappler 17:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

NOTABLE Missing Pages

Carla Kettner is an American TV writer and producer on Pacific Palisades, Due South, Vanished, Cold Squad, Killer Instinct, Judging Amy], Strong Medicine, and Early Edition. She won a 2003 Gracie Allen Award (she shared it with Whoopi Goldberg). [1]

• Betty Rothenberg: American TV director of Y&R from 1984-2002. Nominated for 17 Daytime Emmys and won 7 times. Winner of a DGA Award. [2]; [3]
• Maxine Levinson (American TV producer & TV executive) (ex EP of OLTL, ex-VP of ABC Daytime) [4], [5], [6]

Jeffrey Stepakoff is a Jewish American TV writer for Beauty And The Beast, Major Dad, Simon & Simon, Hyperion Bay, The Wonder Years, Dawson's Creek. He developed and wrote Disney’s Tarzan and Brother Bear. His 2007 book, Billion-Dollar Kiss: The Kiss That Saved Dawson's Creek and Other Adventures in TV Writing, was critically-acclaimed.

Thania St. John is an American TV writer and producer on Life Goes On, Buffy the Vampire Slayer,Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman, 21 Jump Street, Eureka, Huff, Wild Card, Veritas: The Quest, VR.5, and Roswell.

• Dave vonKleist More than 21,000 hits on Yahoo
• David Hiltbrand [7]
• Burton Armus (Emmy nominated writer-NYPD Blue) [8]
• David Schulner: American TV writer/producer on Desperate Housewives, Miss Match, Tell Me You Love Me, Everwood, The Oaks, Once And Again, What About Brian,MDs

John Fisher is an American television producer; Nominated for three Daytime Emmys and won once for Outstanding Drama Series (2005-2007); Served as a producer on Dr. Katz, Professional Therapist, Politically Incorrect, and The Original Max Talking Headroom Show. [9]

Deborah Blackwell is an American television network executive who was responsible for the rise of soap opera centric cable network, SOAPnet. Under Blackwell, as general manager, the channel grew in distribution to more than 67 million homes and secured rights from NBC and CBS - in addition to sib ABC- to run same-day daytime soap episodes. The channel also acquired off-net primetime skeins One Tree Hill and The OC (and before that, Melrose Place, Beverly Hills 90210 and Dallas); SoapNet also extended its stable of original programming -- including its first-ever scripted entry, a spinoff of [[General Hospital]: Night Shift]], and reality entry The Fashionista Diaries. Blackwell left SOAPnet in October of 2007. Brian Frons will oversee the operations of SOAPnet, in addition to ABC Daytime.

Linda Gase is an American television writer/producer who has worked on Standoff (co-Executive Producer), Crossing Jordan (co-executive producer), Wild Card, The District (executive story editor; co-producer), Live Through This (executive story editor), ER (Story editor).

• Mark Jean Mark Jean
• Billy Grundfest Billy Grundfest

Morgan Gendel is an American TV writer & producer. He is a 1996 Writers Guild of America nominee; 1996 Primetime Emmy nominee for Outstanding Drama Series; writer on 1-800-Missing, Spider-Man, Nash Bridges, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine; executive producer of The Dresden Files.

John Leekley is an American TV writer & producer on Wolf Lake, Miami Vice, Spawn

• Deborah Joy Levine (American writer and producer on Any Day Now, Dawson's Creek, Early Edition, Class Actions, The Division, Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman, Beautiful People, Courthouse, Strong Medicine) [10]
• Randall Caldwell [11]
• Anna Fricke: American TV writer and producer on Dawson's Creek, Everwood, Men In Trees, The Trap, Touching Evil [12]
• David Cherrill (ex-Head Writer of Search For Tomorrow)
• Jean Arley: American TV producer of Where The Heart Is & One Life To Live [13]; [14]

Laura Maria Censabella is an American playwright and screenwriter. She has been awarded three grants from the New York Foundation for the Arts: two in playwriting for Abandoned in Queens and Three Italian Women, and The Geri Ashur Award in Screenwriting for her original screenplay Truly Mary.

Her short play Posing was nominated for a Pushcart Prize, and The Actual Footage won the Tennessee Chapbook Prize for Drama. Both plays are published in Poems & Plays. She has written the short film adaptation Physics for HBO's Women: Breaking the Rules series, and she has won two Daytime Emmy Awards for her work on ATWT.

Censabella's half-hour independent film Last Call (directed by Robert Bailey) has been an official selection in festivals throughout the world, including the Avignon Film Festival, the Other Venice Film Festival, the Hermosa Shorts Film Festival, the Sedona International Film Festival, Anthology Film Archives, and the Breckenridge Film Festival where it won the Best Short Drama award.

Censabella's teaching experience includes the New School for Drama, the Actors Studio Drama School (where she developed the playwriting program with Romulus Linney), Columbia University's School of the Arts, Columbia College's Undergraduate Writing Program, City University's MFA Writing Program, The Sewanee Writers' Conference, and Summer Literary Seminars. She is a member of the Dramatists Guild and the Writers Guild of America, East, and graduated from Yale University. External Links: MTSU; IMDB-LMC

Censabella Censabella Category:American television writers Category:Women television writers Category:Soap opera writers Category:Television writers

Christian Hawkey is an American author of The Book of Funnels (Winner of the 2006 Kate Tufts Discovery Award), the chapbook HourHour. In 2006 he was given a Creative Capital Innovative Literature Award, and he has also received awards from the Poetry Fund and the Academy of American Poets. He teaches at Pratt Institute in Brooklyn, NY, and his work has recently been translated into German, Slovene, French, and Portuguese.

• Reed Steiner [15]
• Shelly Moore is an American screenwriter. Positions Held: GH ( 1996- 2002)
• Frederick Rappaport
• Joe Ann Fogle [16]
• Lewis Arlt: American screenwriter [17] [18] [19]
• James Fryman
• Script Coordinator
• Anthony J. Hilder: American documentary producer & conspiracy theorist. Very notable: Yahoo Search On Hilder
• Stephen Schenkel is an American TV producer. Positions Held: All My Children's Executive Producer (March 1986-January 1989). Awards & Nominations: Nominated for several Daytime Emmys. [20]
• David Assael
• Anne McGrail [21]
• Michael Switzer: Prolific TV director [22]
• Nicholas Sgarro
• Kristina Lear: American actress, writer & director. [23]

Nina Tassler is an American television executive, a graduate of Boston University-bachelor of fine arts in theater), and holds the position of President, CBS Entertainment since September 2004. Her boss is Nancy Tellem, President, CBS Paramount Network Television Entertainment Group. Tassler oversees CBS' prime time, late night and daytime programming, as well as program development for all genres.

Other Positions

• Executive Vice President, Drama Series Development, CBS Entertainment (July 2003 -September 2004)
• Senior Vice President, Drama Development, CBS Entertainment (1998- July 2003)
• Vice President, Drama, CBS Productions (August 1997 - 1998)
• Vice President, Drama Development, Warner Bros. Television (199? - 1997)
• Director, Movies and Mini-Series, Lorimar/Warner Bros. Television (1990- ?)
• External Links: Boston U: Tassler & Promo Magazine

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Big Blowdown cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Big Blowdown cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		for single-handededly undertaking the assessement of articles at Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Assessment. Jac16888 15:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

The Sopranos

Hey! Work on the new Sopranos article has been a little slow since it's such a massive project and I'm pretty much all alone with it. I still plan to finish it though and today I resumed working on it. I would appreciate any help you can give me and if you wanna contribute, have a shot at the plot section. I've already started working on it and you could just follow my lead with the reference style I use. I'm gonna finish the production section, then the critical reception section, then I'll move on to heavier stuff. As you can see, the DVD release section is already done. My god, that was tedious. Anyway, feel free to help me out, thanks.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 17:32, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey, great with the references. How'd you do that? Yes, I'm something of a newbie when it comes to that stuff.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 01:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, that's all the work I'm gonna do for today. Feel free to copy-edit what I've written so far.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 07:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

All right, fixed. Check out the lead now. What do you think of the first paragraph of this section. Is it okay to write "Because Italian-American actors are often cast as Mafia-types in Hollywood productions"? Because, obviously, it's true but I don't know how to put it encyclopedic.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 19:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey again. If you're not too busy, I would appreciate it tremendously if you had a look at the production section. I think grammar and tense is an issue. Take this sentence for instance: "The directing staff of The Sopranos consisted mainly of seasoned television directors." It should be consisted, right? Since the show is no longer in production.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 06:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I think the production section is more or less done. I would appreciate copy-editing (needed), and expanding (possibly needed). Anyway, I'm gonna take a break from working on this article for a couple of days now. Hope you're not too busy to help me when I get back.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 07:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for assessing the Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons article. SuperMarioMan 20:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm looking for an English expression...

Hi. I am slowly getting ready to nominate another Carnivàle article for WP:GA. The prose doesn't need to be "brilliant", so a copyedit is not required. But I am looking for an English expression for a header and all my dictionaries aren't helping. Specifically, I need to know a term that summarizes all the things that can be applied to the body that aren't usually a part of it, e.g. tattooes, contact lenses, fake beards and prosthetics. I feel my term "body applications" sounds like a dead man is looking for a job. Can you please help out? – sgeureka ^t•c 21:43, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Characters_of_Carnivàle#Freak_applications_and_costumes (first paragraph; I forgot that I renamed the term to "freak applications" a few days ago). And while I am asking, is "Costumes" or "Costuming" more correct? – sgeureka ^t•c 21:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

This helped very much. Thank you. – sgeureka ^t•c 21:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar

But Scorpion0422 actually did the first Television WikiProject featured topic in May. –thedemonhog talk • edits 19:05, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

DYK

On 14 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Big Blowdown, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Episode Table

You mentioned in your assessment of Kamen Rider 555 that the episodes should be moved and put into the episode guide template. I've tried using that template and can't seem to make it work. Am I doing something wrong? How does it work, exactly? There's no instructions that I saw. -- Howa0082 (talk) 18:00, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Ohh, that's what it looks like? Ok, then. I think there's a WikiProject Tokusatsu version of that, with a ton more blanks for Japanese crap. But uh, yeah. I'll definitely split that list off on it's own, because that's just too much info on that page, I agree. Thanks a bunch. Howa0082 (talk) 00:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Your assessment

A belated thanks ("Thanks!") for the assessment of Judge Judy. You put a lot of effort into reviewing the article's strengths and weaknesses, and your comments will definitely help with developing a plan to improve it. Thanks again. --Ckatz^chat_spy 09:44, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Saw what you said to TTN

I personally doubt that the wikiproject templates should be removed from the talk pages of the merged articles. They can be used to notify other editors to use sandboxes to practice building up the articles' notabilities. Then, when the articles have become notable, they can be restored.

Oh dear, I notice that vanity-page requesting IP user got to you as well. He requested that I create a bunch of those articles as well. I did Susan Strickler, Darin Goldberg, and Robin Burger, but only Susan Strickler survived nomination for deletion. If any of your articles requested went through that, you have my deepest sympathy. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 23:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Press Gang

Hello. I've added the episode templates to all (I think!) the instances where the episodes are used as a primary source. Many thanks for your comments, which have enhanced the article. The JPS^{talk to me} 01:17, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:The Wire - Season 5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Wire - Season 5.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Wire Poot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Wire Poot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Bubbles/Reginald Cousins

I moved the page back because fictional characters who are nearly always called by a nickname get the article at that nickname, even when their real names are known. See Comic Book Guy and Paulie Walnuts for examples. They have known real names but the other characters (and perhaps more importantly, fans, the media, and official websites) use the nickname instead. Andrew Levine 06:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sopranos Hesh Rabkin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sopranos Hesh Rabkin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Imagestart 03:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007

The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 12:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007

The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 12:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007

The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 12:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Carnivàle copyedit

Characters of Carnivàle just successfully passed GA, highlighting a slight problem with in-universe writing. I took care of it and also rewrote related parts of Mythology of Carnivàle, which will have its GA review in about one or two weeks. I would like to go to FTC as soon as possible afterwards and ask whether your offer for a copyedit is still up. I feel I've done all I could with them (Characters and Mythology), and my only real concern now is that some grammar mistakes crept in. I'm just asking so early because your daily wikipedia participation has gone down and you may miss this note for a while. – sgeureka ^t•c 16:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Any time within the next two weeks (edit: next week) would be fine, so take your time. And thank you. :-) – sgeureka ^t•c 17:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Mythology of Carnivàle was also just promoted. :-) I'll go over the two articles again to get rid of some remaining WP:INUNIVERSE issues. Let me know when you've checked/copyedited the articles. I am currently aiming to go to WP:FTC next Wednesday. I am also reading up on a few new-to-me Carnivàle reviews and see if the Characters article is really as comprehensive as I thought. Despite my earlier intentions, I'd like to try FAC with that article, but I'll wait until I really feel prepared; no need to repeat the naïvity of last time. – sgeureka ^t•c 15:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Eh, what the heck. Excuse my impatience, but I have changed my mind a little because uni stuff is coming up and it's better to have the FTC off my mind then. WP:FTC seems mainly concerned with comprehensiveness of the topic, which Carnivàle surely is (as a topic). So I'll focus on getting the Characters article up to speed so that I can (still) consider FA later, which may take some time (a week, a month?). FTCs can also go for a while, so the sooner I apply, the sooner I get the results. If the prose is objected there despite the GA pass (unlikely), there is still time to fix it. I still appreciate any coypedits and input from you. – sgeureka ^t•c 17:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your copyedit. It seems my prose is not as poor as I believed it to still be. :-) Anyway, since you're the third one to say how good the Mythology article is, I thought I could just try for FAC (I reread the article to be sure) and see what happens. The Characters article will have to wait. – sgeureka ^t•c 01:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sopranos Gabriella Dante.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopranos Gabriella Dante.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Random Question...

Hey there. In your review of Star Trek: Enterprise you mentioned that "Some of the referencing uses the cite episode template format and some does not." What does that mean? I'd correct it, but have no idea what to do about it. Howa0082 (talk) 17:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

As a secondary thing, would you be willing to take a look at the article again? I've heavily reworked it, and feel I've addressed your list of points, so would appreciate it if you could gander over thataway. Howa0082 (talk) 21:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Sopranos_Marie_Spatafore.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopranos_Marie_Spatafore.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 11:31, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

You are half correct. The image is irreplaceable because it is a fictional character. But the image is only used in the Elizabeth Bracco article to show how she looks. Since she is a living person it is deemed replaceable by WP:NFCC. Garion96 (talk) 14:28, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

The Wire infoboxes and images

Yeah, getting around to that, don't worry. :) –FunkyVoltron ^talk 17:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

All right, I'll do that. It'll look like this then. By the way, do you think the epigraph looks good there? –FunkyVoltron ^talk 17:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

You could probably do that but I don't know how. I mean, for the season boxes it would be no problem but it would probably look silly if the episode and season boxes are different colors. Of course, you could create one template for each season but I don't know if that's advisable. There's probably some way to color code it, though. If you know a code geek, bring him out now. I actually have no idea how the boxes work, that stuff is a big mystery to me. I just copied the House and Futurama boxes and changed it to information relevant to The wire.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 18:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

The Sopranos

That's okay, real life has been kind of an inconvenience for me too. I'm pretty much done with the production section but the others are still works in progress.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 17:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Another thing about The Wire

All right, I'm gonna replace the infoboxes now. As for guest stars, do you think it's okay if I remove the "as <character>" thing and just use actor names? It looks kind of tacky with a character name in the infobox.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 17:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sopranos Little Paulie.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sopranos Little Paulie.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chris.B (talk) 17:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ep75 09.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ep75 09.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Peer Reviews

Happy New Year, Opark 77! Since you've assessed quite a few good articles and contributed to them, I thought I could solicit your assistance. I've submitted two articles for peer review, and thought that you might be of some help in critiquing them:

• Duck Soup. I've listed this article for peer review because, even though I and other editors have contributed much information and references, I'm certain that there are other aspects of this classic film that have yet to be covered. I'd like to hear feedback from you, so that I can get help in improving this (and other Marx Brothers films) quality.
• Princess Leia Organa. I've listed this article for peer review because it right now seems oddly cluttered and, despite a lot of references as of now, lacks reliable source citations. Although I've already requested another peer review, as long as it helps the articles get better, I've got the time. Any helpful comments will certainly be appreciated, as this should help me in expanding other Star Wars-centric articles.

If you have the time, it'd be great if you could review those articles and assess their strengths and weaknesses. Thanks, and a Happy New Year to you! — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 01:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sopranos Artie Bucco.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopranos Artie Bucco.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sopranos Marie Spatafore.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopranos Marie Spatafore.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XX - January 2008

The January 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 14:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sopranos Jimmy Petrille.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopranos Jimmy Petrille.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sopranos Vic Caputo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopranos Vic Caputo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Victoria Wood As Seen On TV Feature Article nomination

Just to inform you, as you asked, that I have put forward Victoria Wood As Seen On TV forward as a Feature Article candidate. bingo99, 22 January 2008, 07:20 —Preceding comment was added at 07:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Prop Joe

Check my reply to your spoiler debate in The Wire's talk page. --Daysleeper47 (talk) 00:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Removing spoilers

Hi Opark 77 - your edits removing "spoilers" from Transitions (The Wire episode) was raised at the administrator's noticeboard (see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Removing_spoilers.) It doesn't matter what you have decided the policy should be for The Wire pages - Wikipedia has a general policy on spoilers. After the episode has been made viewable via On Demand or anything other legal means, the plot is verifiable and should be included in the article. Don't edit war over such content, please. By your logic, we should not include the information after the episode has been broadcast in the United States because it would "spoil" the show for viewers in other countries. Neıl ☎ 13:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem - good luck and keep up the good work. Neıl ☎ 14:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

The Wire

No need to apologize. It was simply two differing interpretations on the policy, which is bound to happen. I will work where I can to improve some Wire articles, however I am on a self-imposed Wikibreak, making fewers edits as other priorities in life have arisen. Cheers, Daysleeper47 (talk) 15:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Guests of the Wire

I've been meaning to ask you about your findings also. The Vincent Ward one was a mistake. But here are pics of Alan J. Wendl and John Badila: [24] [25] They are similar looking, I guess. But if you watch the episode again, I think you'll agree which one is which. I've been wanting to ask you how you have made your findings. For example, how do you know that Sophia Wang was the "Six Flags girl" and not Christine Lee? I would guess that we are both guessing combined with the best info available.

When McNulty reads the article it says "M. Scott Templeton and Alma M. Gutierrez". Also, when Templeton is on Nancy Grace, it says "M. Scott Templeton" at the bottom of the screen. MrBlondNYC (talk) 18:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I found a pic of Sohn and her daughters and I believe you are correct. But we're still not sure who was the first girl. Oh, well. let's keep working together on these articles. Maybe I could be like your rewrite man. MrBlondNYC (talk) 19:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

The Wire restructuring

I noticed you've began to restructure The Wire episodes. I think it's great that the episode pages are consistent. One thing to note though: the guest stars box needs to be changed to [[#Guest stars|see below]] for the link to actually work (it was "Guest starring roles" before but you changed it).–FunkyVoltron ^talk 01:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Prop Joe in Transitions

"I moved the page back because fictional characters who are nearly always called by a nickname get the article at that nickname, even when their real names are known. See Comic Book Guy and Paulie Walnuts for examples. They have known real names but the other characters (and perhaps more importantly, fans, the media, and official websites) use the nickname instead." This is a recall of an earlier entry on this page. You are also contradicting yourself with these edits since you are still referring to Cheese as "Cheese" instead of his real name. Please stop your poor editing practices of the Wire. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.139.1.68 (talk) 13:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm the guy who wrote the quoted post. I'd go with either "Prop Joe" or "Propositon Joe." The appellation is appropriate since it's the name everyone on the show (cops and dealers alike) calls him. "Cheese" is fine too. The IP is being pedantic. Andrew Levine (talk) 18:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Wire Brother Mouzone.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Wire Brother Mouzone.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Wire DeLonda.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Wire DeLonda.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Wire Donnelly.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Wire Donnelly.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Wire Donut.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Wire Donut.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Wire Kenard.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Wire Kenard.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Wire Parenti.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Wire Parenti.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Wire Serge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Wire Serge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Wire Sherrod.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Wire Sherrod.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Wire Withers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Wire Withers.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's Day!

User:Wilhelmina Will has wished you a happy Valentine's day, and good luck in love and friendship!

A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Raylene Lee

Hey opark! I just wondering if you were sure that Raylene's last name is Lee. I know she's Michael Lee's mother but do we know for sure that Michael has her last name or that she married Michael's father? MrBlondNYC (talk) 01:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Haha, WOW, that's some good detective work! MrBlondNYC (talk) 22:20, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

MARIA ARENA BELL

Maria Arena Bell is an American novelist, television and freelance writer. She graduated from Northwestern University in 1987. In February 2007, she was appointed to the 'Commission on The Status of Women' by Arnold Schwarzenegger. Her essays have been published in The New York Times and C Magazine.

During the 2007 Writers Guild of America strike, she took Financial Core Status (FiCore) to become Y&R's co-head writer. Guild members who have chosen to go FiCore still pay dues to the Guild but are no longer members with voting privileges. She is married to the eldest son of William J. Bell & Lee Phillip Bell, Bill Bell Jr. She is a registered Republican.

Positions Held

• The Young And The Restless: Co-Head Writer (December 26, 2007 - present)
• The Bold And The Beautiful: Script Writer (1987-1989) (credited as Maria Arena) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.149.152 (talk) 20:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Ron Lagomarsino

Ron Lagomarsino is an American director. His credits include The Unit, Once And Again, Ghost Whisperer, The Brotherhood of Poland, New Hampshire, Big Shots, Homefront (Friend of LML), Picket Fences, The Trials of Rosie O'Neill, My So-Called Life, What About Brian, Ally McBeal, Joan of Arcadia, Side Order of Life, Shark, Another World, thirtysomething, One Life To Live, The Madam's Family: The Truth About The Canal Street Brothel

Awards/Nominations: A single Daytime Emmy (1985), Primetime Emmy Award (1992) & DGA Award (1993). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.149.152 (talk) 20:20, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Nina Tassler

Nina Tassler (Boston U: Tassler)/(Promo Magazine) is an American television executive, a graduate of Boston University-bachelor of fine arts in theater), and holds the position of President, CBS Entertainment since September 2004. Her boss is Nancy Tellem, President, CBS Paramount Network Television Entertainment Group. Tassler oversees CBS' prime time, late night and daytime programming, as well as program development for all genres.

Other Positions Held

• Executive Vice President, Drama Series Development, CBS Entertainment (July 2003 -September 2004)
• Senior Vice President, Drama Development, CBS Entertainment (1998- July 2003)
• Vice President, Drama, CBS Productions (August 1997 - 1998)
• Vice President, Drama Development, Warner Bros. Television (199? - 1997)
• Director, Movies and Mini-Series, Lorimar/Warner Bros. Television (1990- ?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.149.152 (talk) 20:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Steven Robman

Steven Robman is an American television and theatre director. He is married to Kathy Baker and has a friendship with Jennifer Love Hewitt.

Directing Credits

• The Young And The Restless
• Relative Chaos (2006)
• Hello Sister, Goodbye Life (2006)
• Medium (2005)
• Love Rules! (2004)
• The O.C.
• Gilmore Girls (2002)
• The Guardian (1 episode, 2002)
• Thieves (2001)
• Boston Public (2000)
• The Audrey Hepburn Story (2000)
• Time of Your Life
• Dawson's Creek
• L.A. Firefighters
• Party of Five
• Nowhere Man
• Murder One
• The Client
• Law & Order
• Diagnosis Murder
• L.A. Law
• Melrose Place
• Northern Exposure
• Sisters
• thirtysomething
• Family Ties
• Sea Marks (1976)

External Links: IMBD Profile —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.149.152 (talk) 20:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

LINDA GASE

Linda Gase is an American television writer who has worked on Standoff (co-Executive Producer), Crossing Jordan (co-executive producer), Wild Card, The Young & The Restless, The District (executive story editor; co-producer), Live Through This (executive story editor), ER (Story editor). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.149.152 (talk) 20:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Betty Rothenberg

Betty Rothenberg is an American television director. She directed Y&R episodes from 1984-2002. She has been nominated for 17 Daytime Emmys and won 7 times. She is a winner of a DGA Award. [26]; [27]

Laura Maria Censabella

Laura Maria Censabella is an American playwright and screenwriter. She has been awarded three grants from the New York Foundation for the Arts: two in playwriting for Abandoned in Queens and Three Italian Women, and The Geri Ashur Award in Screenwriting for her original screenplay Truly Mary.

Her short play Posing was nominated for a Pushcart Prize, and The Actual Footage won the Tennessee Chapbook Prize for Drama. Both plays are published in Poems & Plays. She has written the short film adaptation Physics for HBO's Women: Breaking the Rules series, and she has won two Daytime Emmy Awards for her work on ATWT.

Censabella's half-hour independent film Last Call (directed by Robert Bailey) has been an official selection in festivals throughout the world, including the Avignon Film Festival, the Other Venice Film Festival, the Hermosa Shorts Film Festival, the Sedona International Film Festival, Anthology Film Archives, and the Breckenridge Film Festival where it won the Best Short Drama award.

Censabella's teaching experience includes the New School for Drama, the Actors Studio Drama School (where she developed the playwriting program with Romulus Linney), Columbia University's School of the Arts, Columbia College's Undergraduate Writing Program, City University's MFA Writing Program, The Sewanee Writers' Conference, and Summer Literary Seminars. She is a member of the Dramatists Guild and the Writers Guild of America, East, and graduated from Yale University.

External Links: MTSU; IMDB-LMC —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.149.152 (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Jamal/The Wire

I'm pretty sure he is there at Cutty's gym along with Justin. I'll watch again to make sure but I think its him. MrBlondNYC (talk) 21:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Soprano episodes, baby

Hey. I've done some work Soprano Home Movies article. I'm gonna submit it for a peer review soon so I would appreciate it if you took a look at it. I've added as much as I could find. If you could expand the article by adding stuff from the book, that would be great. I think the plot summary in particular is in need of copy-editing. If you're not too busy, of course. Thanks a lot!–FunkyVoltron ^talk 16:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!–FunkyVoltron ^talk 12:23, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

The Wire

Well, why not get a head start? It's not like anyone's gonna be checking those articles until after the finale has aired anyway. But of course you're right. I do think the character's fates in the final episode should be listed in the cause section, do you agree? Have you seen the finale, by the way? If so, what did you think?–FunkyVoltron ^talk 15:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I admit you got me here. Spoilers are everywhere now, though, so it's not like people won't expect to find spoilers on Wikipedia.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 17:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXII - March 2008

The March 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --17:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

The Wire characters

No problem. I'm still working on my Sopranos episodes ("Soprano Home Movies" now a FA) but I'll be glad to help you write some The Wire related article to FA status. Maybe an episode or a character?–FunkyVoltron ^talk 15:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll be happy to try a rewrite of Final Grades (The Wire episode). As the fourth season finale, I think it's notable. I also think it's the most mind-blowing, gut-wrenching 80 minutes of television ever produced. The plot summary has to be rewritten, basically from scratch, though. I don't have the season 4 DVD yet (I live in Europe so I buy R2 DVDs and it was just released here) but I know there's a commentary track for that episode by Simon. That will probably be helpful. There's also plenty of reviews and articles and whatnot on the internet.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 18:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

The Wire lead

I tried to rewrite the lead for The Wire (TV series) now that the show is over. I really don't think we need to name all those newspapers in the lead; settled on an overall critical impression, which, as you know, is very positive.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 15:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

The Wire: Prop Joe math

The math from my edit is correct, the current sentence implies a discount of 80 percent rather than a mark-up of 20 percent as any figure multiplied by less than 100 percent yields a number less than the original figure, and if you multiply any figure by more than 100 percent you get a number larger than the original figure. There's no need to undo my edit, because the math is correct. 67.181.212.109 (talk) 18:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I forgot to sign in, the above is me. LoganRage (talk) 18:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - 1st Coordinators Election

An election has been proposed and has been set up for this project. Description of the roles etc., can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators. If you wish to stand, enter your candidacy before the end of March and ask your questions of anyone already standing at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators/May 2008. Voting will start on the 1st April and close at the end of April. The intention is for the appointments to last from May - November 2008. For other details check out the pages or ask. KevinalewisBot (talk) 13:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject The Wire

Hello, Opark 77/Archive 1 and thank you for your contributions on articles related to The Wire. I'd like to invite you to become a part of Wikipedia: WikiProject The Wire, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Wire and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out and participate, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! Creamy3 (talk) 20:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)~~~~

WikiProject The Wire

I did propose this WikiProject to the WikiProject council and they said that it was perfectly fine. Do you want to help me get it up and running, you obviously have a wealth of information on The Wire. We could really use your help and guidance. Thanks. Creamy3 (talk) 19:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi Opark 77, I was wondering why all of the other Wikipedia pages that have those images are allowed to have them. Here's a link to the proposal that I made to the WikiProject council. [28] Thanks again, and consider joining; it would mean a lot to me. Creamy3 (talk) 20:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

No Opark 77 you're right about the free image stuff. I'm sorry about all that. I assure that my WikiProject is valid though. Andrew Levine (talk · contribs) is a member. You would be a great help. You're right about Nerese Campbell, although I think she's a fascinating character. Creamy3 (talk) 20:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely Opark 77, it's a pleasure to be working with you. Let's get started. Creamy3 (talk) 20:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Help request

Do you need to complete the proposal process before you can begin a Wikiproject? The above WikiProject The Wire was recently started by Creamy3 but I'm not sure about its validity. Could someone help me talk this new user through the reasons why using non-free images on templates relating to this wikiproject is not allowed.--Opark 77 (talk) 20:25, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

My original question about when you should begin a wikiproject and whether you require the proposal process to be completed still stands. 2 people have nullified this help request. I assure you I am still seeking help!--Opark 77 (talk) 22:50, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

There is no official process as WP:COUNCIL is their to organize all of the Wikiprojects, though it might be easier if they know about it, and they will be able to give you tips. ~ LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 22:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

The above makes no sense to me - I think some words are missing. I think its probably a suggestion to contact the Wikiproject council but having visited their page I find no way to do so.--Opark 77 (talk) 23:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:COUNCILs job is to create a directory of wikiprojects. You technically do not need their approval, but they would be able to help you because some of their members have created their own wikiprojects, and would be of assistance in creating the project page, templates, etc. Hope this clarifies it ~ LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 23:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

DYK congratulations

On 20 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency (TV series), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Creamys

Hi Opark 77. I just wanted to address some of your concerns about all of those users with the word "creamy" in their usernames who were a part of WikiProject The Wire and then were not. They are a part of a group known as the "Creamy Army", a group that I started. When they saw that I had started a new WikiProject they joined it. Seeing as how none of them are active members of Wikipedia and how none of them are familiar with The Wire I told them to take their names off of the project's "members" section. They're good people, but they aren't too interested in making articles or contributing constructively, so I told them that I'd like to go on with the project without them. Thanks again for your help with the project and with additional information. All the best. Creamy3 (talk) 02:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Have you ever read "Shame the Devil" by George Pelecanos? It's great. Creamy3 (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Image: The Wire - Season 5

Sorry I couldn't get back to you Opark... I was editing from a phone at the time... anyway, I restored it and put it back. Hope you're doing well! east.718 at 22:26, March 20, 2008

Thanks

Thanks for all of the information that you gave me earlier. Just to tell you, I'll be on vacation for about a week and I won't be able to edit during that time. I look forward to editing went I get back. Thanks again! Creamy3 (talk) 01:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

The first WikiProject The Wire newsletter is now available. Add to it if you can; thanks. Creamy3 (talk) 22:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Brotherhood

So, are you a fan of Brotherhood? I've been looking at the article and there seems to be enough information about the show to write it to featured article status. I've been working on it from time to time but only minor stuff like improving the episode list and creating and expanding Blake Masters. I think it's absolutely the best show on television now that The Wire has ended and I would gladly help with a rewrite/expansion of the article.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 14:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sopranos Ep56 tonyb silvio.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopranos Ep56 tonyb silvio.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Opark 77, I'm new to Wikipedia and I just joined a couple of WikiProjects. I made a page for the book Shame the Devil. Just thought I'd say hello. Thanks. Flakes41 (talk) 20:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Greetings - Please Help

Hi Opark 77

I really don't know what I'm doing on Wikipedia. That much is obvious, since you deleted my "nonsensical, unsourced" section on A New Day (The Wire episode).

All I wanted to say was to warn people not to watch the commentary on this episode (which is on Disc 3) until they've watched all of the rest of the episodes on Disc 4, because Robert Chew, reveals a "major plot point", which I didn't want to say what it was (the death of a major character). Disc 4 hadn't even come from Netflix is for me, and the way that goes, I thought it would be appropriate to watch commentary on Disc 3, without having to worry about this.

There is a whole page on Wikipedia called Spoiler, if you have no clue what I'm talking about. Roger Ebert's essay on Million Dollar Baby seems to be a big "source" for this discussion.

I don't know. Maybe I was just upset.

You seem like an authority, but if you think it's inappropriate to give this warning on Wikipedia's page for this episode, then so be it. I mentioned it on the discussion board for the episode on imdb, and also on Robert Chew's page.

If you think it has merit, do you have any ideas how I can make it less (or not at all) nonsensical and how to properly source it?

Anyway, thanks for listening. I didn't really know how this works at all, and I didn't know how to find somebody that does.

Warm Regards

Kire1975 (talk) 23:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Wire Snoop.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:The Wire Snoop.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 19:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Wire Michael.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:The Wire Michael.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 13:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sopranos_Charmaine_Bucco.jpg

I have tagged Image:Sopranos_Charmaine_Bucco.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 08:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sopranos_Little_Carmine.jpg

I have tagged Image:Sopranos_Little_Carmine.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 08:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Brotherhood episodes

I've been working on List of Brotherhood episodes with the intent of making it a featured list someday. I think I'm almost there; however, rewriting plot summaries is not easy. I wonder if you're interested in helping me? I've written the plot summaries for season 2 from the Showtime summaries but I fear that they're too short. Copyediting is also needed. Have a look if you're not too busy.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 19:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

It's now a FL candidate again. Have a look if you're still around.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 12:55, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Much appreciated!–FunkyVoltron ^talk 13:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Mad Men writers

Hey, I noticed you've created articles for the non-Weiner Mad Men writers. Good work. With the exception of Rick Cleveland, who is now a writer/consulting producer, I'm afraid they're all fairly obscure. Robin Veith is a she and was nominated for an Emmy for her co-writing of "The Wheel." Also, I think Andre Jacquemetton & Maria Jacquemetton could do with one article since they haven't done anything individually. Also, the writers - Cleveland is again the exception - are old friends of Weiner.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 18:58, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

The Wire title references and epigraphs

I was just looking back on my old contributions and realised that these sections, several of which I wrote, are largely just original research with no basis in the articles. It is, in my opinion, these probably need removal or fixing to bring away from peoples interpretations of them. –– Lid^(Talk) 12:11, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

• Image:The Wire Cheese.jpg
• Image:The Wire Old Face.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Dealt with.--Opark 77 (talk) 09:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Made in America (The Sopranos) peer review

Posted a peer review for that controversial, brilliant Sopranos finale. Have a look if you have some time to spare.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 09:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

It's a FAC now and I'd love for you to have a look at it: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Made in America (The Sopranos).–FunkyVoltron ^talk 21:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

The Wire

Well, I think they all need to be story summaries instead of explaining when the seasons began airing and going into production details. It looks very inconsistent right now.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 11:44, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

File:The Wire Corbett.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Wire Corbett.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 10:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Jeffrey Stepakoff

Jeffrey Stepakoff is an American television writer, producer, and author.

Education: He earned a degree in journalism from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. After graduation, he began working at an advertising agency. He graduated from Carnegie Mellon University with a Master of Fine Arts in playwriting in 1988. He teaches at Kennesaw State University as Assistant Professor of Screenwriting since 2006.

Stepakoff’s ticket to television writing came through a Carnegie Mellon contact who was involved with ER. The contact helped introduce him to an agent and David Milch, creator of "Deadwood" and NYPD Blue. The 1988 Writers Guild of America strike prevented Stepakoff from working right away. Although he was offered a job as a scab writer for CBS's Charles In Charge, produced by Universal Television, he turned it down. When the strike ended, he was offered another job by Universal to write for Simon & Simon. His credits include Zoe Busiek: Wild Card, Major Dad, Dawson's Creek, Tarzan, Hyperion Bay, "C-16: FBI", "Flipper", "Sisters (Creative Consultant), "The Wonder Years", "Major Dad", and "Simon & Simon". Stepakoff also created pilots for 20th Century, Paramount Pictures, MTM, Fox and ABC. He developed and wrote major motion pictures, including Disney's Tarzan and Brother Bear.

His book BILLION-DOLLAR KISS: The Kiss That Saved Dawson’s Creek and Other Adventures in TV Writing [29], a revealing account of his experiences in the television industry, is a critically acclaimed one.

Membership: Stepakoff is a member of the Writers Guild of America, the Writers Guild of Canada, the Screen Actors Guild, and IATSE, and is a voting member of the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences. He currently resides with his wife and children in Dunwoody, Georgia.

External Links: [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]

Lee Shallat Chemel

Lee Shallat Chemel [43] is a prolific American television director. She has been nominated for three Emmy Awards.

Directing Credits

• Gossip Girl
• Cavemen
• Samantha Who?
• Side Order of Life
• Gilmore Girls (Including Co-Executive Producer) [44]
• The Bernie Mac Show
• Hannah Montana
• Stacked
• Living With Fran
• Barbershop
• The Bad Girl's Guide
• Life on A Stick
• Arrested Development
• "The Stones"
• Greener Mountains
• "Rock Me, Baby"
• "Eve" (2003)
• "The Pitts"
• "That's So Raven"
• Titletown
• "Andy Richter Controls The Universe
• "George Lopez"
• "Raising Dad"
• "Greg The Bunny"
• "The Random Years"
• "Judging Amy"
• "Kristin"
• "Three Sisters"
• "The Trouble With Normal"
• "Titus"
• "Battery Park"
• "Becker"
• Ladies Man
• "Maggie Winters"
• "Conrad Bloom"
• "Costello"
• "Veronica's Closet"
• "Just Shoot Me"
• "Spin City"
• "Fired Up"
• Dads
• The Dave Chappelle Project
• "NewsRadio"
• "Hudson Street"
• "Ned and Stacey"
• "Murphy Brown"
• "Mad About You"
• Weldon Pond
• "The Nanny"
• "CBS Schoolbreak Special"
• Banner Times
• Love & War
• "Northern Exposure"
• "Princesses"
• "Down Home"
• "Head of The Class"
• "Going Places"
• Life In Desire
• "Full House"
• Marblehead Manor
• "CBS Summer Playhouse"
• "Amen"
• "Valerie"
• "Benson"
• "Down to Earth"
• "Newhart"
• "Family Ties"
• "Diff'rent Strokes" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.37.144 (talk) 20:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

File:The Wire Bond.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Wire Bond.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 17:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Dexter taskforce

Hi, I see you've created/expanded a number of the articles for the team of writers on Dexter. I was wondering whether you were interested in a potential Dexter taskforce? You can sign up here. :) —97198 (talk) 13:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wire critics/awards section needs some aid

I was just re-reading this article, having done some work on it a long time back (and finding some very old talk page posts of mine in the process) and while I see a common complaint theme of over referencing (largely regarding plot development having 2-4 references when effectively only requiring one - the episode itself), the bigger problem I stumbledupon was that the Acclaim section has been sent to the back burner.

What I mean is that the critical section seems to have been largely uneditted since before the fifth season, began, and the series entirely ended. The analysis goes upto season four, and then general calls for greatest show of all time that were based on the first four seasons. However at this point it makes zero mentions of the fifth season, or the critical reception of the fifth season, and then to a more significant extent because it has been ignored since the end of the fourth season it contains zero critical analysis of the series as a completed whole.

Less important, and more related to consistancy, but the awards section is inconsistant in its usage of winning awards and nominations using a largely unfamiliar italics/bold system I do not believe exists on other articles. It should probably be shifted to a format in the shape of:

• Best Television Show Ever Awards
  • Won
    • Best yadda yadda yadda
  • Nominated
    • Best blah blah blah.

I see you are a little busy with Simon's latest project, but on an FA that you have put such time into it seems a glaring oversight which I would do myself but there are certain... circumstances... that hinder my post-season four Wire knowledge currently that won't be rectified for a bit. –– Lid^(Talk) 11:06, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Unrelated but you should probably archive your talk page, it's quite large and unwieldy. See WP:ARCHIVE for details. –– Lid^(Talk) 00:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Beverly Hills, 90210 franchise

Thanks for your assessment of Beverly Hills, 90210 franchise. -- James26 (talk) 04:06, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Ancient Request for Criminal Minds Cast

I'll get started on this, thank you for mentioning it on the Criminal Minds Episode List talk page. :) --Naazupin (talk) 21:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Peer review

Can you tell me what i can do y¿to improve this page go to http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Family_Guy, ans later please comment on http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Family_Guy/archive2, thanks. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Wire - Season 5.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Wire - Season 5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Opark 77! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 400 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Hassan Johnson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Chad Coleman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Andrea Calderwood - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Harley Peyton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Paul Redford - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Julie Hebert - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of FBI on The Sopranos

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is FBI on The Sopranos. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FBI on The Sopranos. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Little Paulie Germani

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Little Paulie Germani. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Paulie Germani. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Shiban

The article John Shiban has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 01:52, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ted Mann (writer)

The article Ted Mann (writer) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 01:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2