User talk:Onwuka Glory

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Ikwuano ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 23:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Your edit to Ajeromi-Ifelodun has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. -- EN-Jungwon 05:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi Onwuka Glory, thank you for your attempts to improve sourcing in Wikipedia articles. Please be careful to cite reliable sources; dbpedia is not a reliable source since it copies content from Wikipedia, while marketingadvisoryservices.com is not an informational website and this page is just a random jumble of sentences with no coherence and no factual content – so that also can't be used as a source in Wikipedia. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 20:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

I'm sorry, but your grammar edits to a number of articles have changed correctly written English into incorrect English, and other editors have had to revert or fix your edits. It looks like you do not yet have sufficient command of English to make that kind of edit right now.

As an example, today you changed the first paragraph of the introduction of the child labour article from this to this. There was no reason to split the paragraph into three paragraphs; the sentences beginning with "However" and "Although" are sentence fragments; the correct semicolon was changed into an incorrect colon; and "exceptions" is a plural noun which means that the verb has to be "include", not "includes".

English grammar is pretty tricky sometimes, and there is absolutely nothing strange about it being hard to get it right – but since it creates work for other volunteers when an error is introduced into an article, I would like to ask you not to make any grammar edits to Wikipedia articles until your command of English is a bit stronger. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 09:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dora Akunyili, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Distinction. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your students

Hello, you probably weren't told this but there are actually some quite strict guidelines about which articles should or should not be linked, that you and other accounts associated with you (presumably your students?) have violated in highly disruptive ways. Because of their exceedingly suspicious and unusual pattern, the accounts have been blocked and listed at this sockpuppet investigations page. If you could note any more accounts either here or there, that would be great. Given your editing history so far, I strongly suggest that your efforts would be much better focused on Wikipedia editions in your Nigerian regional/tribal language, rather than in English; the actions so far on both your account and those presumably associated with you have caused extreme disruption. I would like to know if you were given the OK to undertake this project by someone and if so, whom; I would suggest that they need some strong words about what is and is not permissible here. Graham87 16:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, rapidly adding wikilinks (especially problematic ones) is generally considered to signify that editors are trying to game the system here to artificially boost their edit count; that's why Wikipedia editors have come down so harsh on edits by you and your students. Graham87 16:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, the Guidance for younger editors strongly emphasises that young people shouldn't use their real name online; it seems like most of your students didn't exactly do that. There's also the page about School and university projects. Graham87 18:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Graham87 put it very well. Please list all the accounts that have added wikilinks under your guidance so they can be reviewed whether they are appropriate or not. Once you do, I am willing to unblock the accounts on the condition you familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's linking guidelines mentioned above, and Wikipedia procedures in general. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 19:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy: Also see Onwuka Glory's conversation with me on my talk page. I'll let you take over from here with practical matters; it's way way past my bedtime where I am. Nigeria is on UTC+1. Graham87 19:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Onwuka Glory, and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are a course instructor leading a class project.

New to Wikipedia or want to learn about best practices for Wikipedia assignments?

Go through our online training for educators

The training includes instructions for setting up a structured course page, with tools for tracking student work and encouraging peer review. Please also see this helpful advice for instructors.

If you run into problems or want some feedback on your Wikipedia assignment plans, try posting to the education noticeboard.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay after your assignment is finished! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your recent messages on my talk page

Hi Onwuka, thanks for your messages on my talk page, and in particular the link to your dashboard, from which I notice there's a list of editors and an activity log so it's possible to log the editors' activities until this Tuesday, at least. While I've reviewed the edits by the editors I hadn't found before, I haven't blocked them because they haven't edited recently ... but I just don't feel comfortable unblocking the other users just yet, and I can't exactly put my finger on why. If I understand correctly you've advised the students to stop editing via a group chat with them (which they have). Finding ways to use sandboxes for teaching purposes is your job, not mine, and I'm not at all the best person to advise on that ... they're just a public-facing space where users can experiment without damaging the rest of Wikipedia. Frankly, if you can't process the links I've already given you and make them into a coherent teaching plan, I question whether you should be trying to run an edit-a-thon. And also the fact that that word is spelt "Edith-a-ton" on your pages doesn't help your case either ... neither do misleading edit summaries where you say you're adding a word but actually remove text. The above is just my opinion though; I'm open to any other views from experienced editors. Graham87 09:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Graham87 It's a tough case. We are generally open to educational activities (WP:SUP), but at the same time the instructors need to understand and respect our rules. Havign the students do WP:BTW-type activities is great - but they need to understnad the difference between helpful wiki liking and indiscriminate see-of-blue creation (WP:OVERLINKING). If Onwuka Glory can confirm that students will now understand the concept of overlinking and will be more careful in what they link, I'd support unblocking everyone. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Graham87 I've been following this situation, and I'd like to advocate for unblocking the new users. These editors come from an underrepresented demographic, and the encyclopedia could benefit from encouraging them to contribute.

@Onwuka Glory, I expect that Graham87's reluctance to unblock is because your own editing history is problematic. You haven't made many helpful contributions, and many of your edits have been reverted. You will have to learn alongside your students how to make helpful contributions to the encyclopedia. Please encourage everyone to experiment in their sandbox and focus on clearly helpful editing in mainspace: Graham87's idea about fixing typos and spelling errors is a great suggestion for beginners. I'm happy to help with questions. What are the objectives of your project? Larataguera (talk) 13:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about things (given the message just posted on my talk page, the one by Piotrus (wow, the ref to "Build the web" is a blast from the past!), and especially the one just above by Larataguera (that I've just noticed), I'm thinking it might be worth a try to unblock everyone and find out what happens ... hopefully good things! I'll do that now. Graham87 13:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All done. I accidentally put the wrong link in my unblock message so I reblocked several users for a second to make sure the correct link was in their block log. I tried to disable consequent autoblocks but, in those cases where I didn't manage to do so due to a bad key press, it shouldn't have had any effect. In other words, all of your students should be clear to edit now! Graham87 14:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million. You 've kept me standing and I deserve it but I did learn from this review.

I implore you to put an eye on us as this has made me sit up to start all over again to work on myself. Thanks once again, I'm grateful. 😄😃👍 Onwuka Glory (talk) 14:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Women in Green June 2023 Good Article Editathon notification

Hello Onwuka Glory:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in June 2023!

Running from June 1 to 30, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – another Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female climate scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning book or film by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Edit-a-thon

Hi, I'm thankful for this message. Please, would it include Wikidata Edit-a-thon? Also, can I get some lists of articles to work on? Thanks.

Glory Onwuka Glory (talk) 04:54, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Onwuka Glory -- This event is not focused on Wikidata, but on making improvements to existing Wikipedia articles and bringing them up to Good Article standards (you can learn more about the Good Article criteria here). If you're looking for possible articles to work on, there are some suggestions near the top of the event page, but you're welcome to choose different articles as well. This event is intended to help editors with less experience learn how to bring an article up to Good Article status -- if you have any questions about it (or the Good Article nomination and review process), please let me know. All the best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 11:28, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Movement Charter Drafting Committee's monthly newsletter: August 2023

Updates

Community consultation: The community consultation on the Global Council, Hubs, and the Glossary drafts is ongoing. We value your input, if you have not already, please take a moment to review the draft chapters and share your thoughts with the MCDC. We’ve posed open questions we would like your opinion on. Feel free to engage in a way that is most comfortable for you and your community. Learn more on our Diff blogs about the Global Council and Hubs.
Launch Party: On July 30 we hosted a Launch Party to share the Global Council and Hubs draft chapters. It was an inspiring event where we had the opportunity to listen to your feedback and address some of your questions. If you missed it, you can catch the recording on YouTube.
Community Conversations: We want to hear from as many people as possible. On July 16, the SWAN meeting opened its doors and offered an opportunity to interact with the MCDC members regarding the new drafts of the charter. Notes are available here. On July 28, a regional conversation with the Francophone community was held. Here comes a short summary here in English and French. Additionally, on August 2 we had a fruitful conversation with the LATAM region.
MCDC’s Work in July: As usual, the update includes information about the meetings held by the Committee in this month, as well as about the work that was completed and the ongoing work & discussions.

Upcoming

Join the MCDC at Wikimania: Whether you’ll be at Wikimania 2023 in person or joining virtually, there are a few events that we would like to invite you to. Please drop by for a casual conversation. We would love to connect to workshop any ideas together. Drop in, get a sweet treat, and share your thoughts with us! Register and see below for an overview of our time together:
- Tuesday, August 15
  - 02:00 UTC: Movement Strategy & Governance Connection track - Welcome and opening (Room 325)
  - 05:45 UTC: Movement Charter Drafting Committee: Open office hour (Room 326)
- Wednesday, August 16
  - 03:15 UTC: Role Play the Future Roles and Responsibilities in the Movement (Room 326)
- Thursday, 17 August
  - 03:15 UTC: Movement Charter Content Discussions (Room 310)
A regional call tailored for the MENA region will be conducted in Arabic on September 2 at 17.00 UTC. Kindly indicate your interest to attend this meeting.

Subscribe to this newsletter on Meta-wiki

MCDC Support Team, 23:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Women in Green GA Editathon October 2023 - Around the World in 31 Days

Hello Onwuka Glory:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Green GA Editathon June 2024 - Going Back in Time

Hello Onwuka Glory:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in June 2024!

Running from June 1 to 30, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Going Back in Time! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 20 centuries by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 19:03, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, redress from your anger, I have learnt it . please, unblock me let me finish up well and hands off.

Thanks

Onwuka Glory Onwuka Glory (talk) 20:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit to the article Greg Ball (cyclist), where you added details about a completely unrelated person for no apparent reason, is just ... completely unfathomable to me. I've gone through all your recent edits and undone most of them; they show an extreme level of incompetence. In particular, edits like this one to Charlotte Cleverley-Bisman show that in your three years of editing you have never read Wikipedia's guidelines on styling dates, or indeed checked other examples of articles to find out what the accepted style is. The only thing you should be doing to the English Wikipedia from now on is reading it, not editing or even trying to teach about it as you did last time we met. There is nothing that could convince me to let you be unblocked; you are not suited to editing Wikipedia. Graham87 (talk) 19:03, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're apparently organising this contest. Just ... wow. I'd be more OK with it if it just involved Nigeria (or perhaps the wider region); please do not draw articles about other countries into it. Graham87 (talk) 19:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear [User: Graham 87], good evening from Nigeria. Please, unblock me. I have committed a deep wiki offense, please! Tamper justice with mercy. Please, be merciful unto me, I have learned from my mistake. I won't do it again nor would it reoccur.

Thanks Onwuka Glory (talk) 19:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biblical rhetoric won't help here. Neither will disabled unblock templates ... but if you can't figure out how to fix that yourself, that's another strike against you. Good night. Graham87 (talk) 20:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me !

Dear Admin Graham87, please unblock me. {{Unblock|reason= I do not know that I got it wrong. Please, if so I have made a mistake}}

Thanks

Onwuka Glory (talk) 22:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. That block request is nonsensical and doesn't even work anyway, once again. Also, pings don't work retroactively, as you tried in this edit. I am revoking your access to this talk page because it's clear that you can't use it properly. Graham87 (talk) 04:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Graham87 (talk) 04:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]