User talk:Onkardharke

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Neoliberalism, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 13:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contextual political analysis moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Contextual political analysis. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 07:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Contextual political analysis

Hello Onkardharke, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Contextual political analysis, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contextual political analysis.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SunDawn,

Thank you for reaching out and for your message regarding the Contextual political analysis article.

I understand that deletion discussions are a part of the process, and I appreciate the opportunity to address the concerns raised. I believe that Contextual political analysis has value and is worth including on Wikipedia, as it provides an important framework for understanding political analysis in its broader context. I will review the article and work on improving it to ensure its notability and clarity.

I would be happy to discuss the article further and provide additional references to help establish its significance. Please feel free to share any specific concerns or suggestions that could guide the improvements.

Thanks again for your consideration. I look forward to working together to improve this article.

Best regards,

Onkardharke Onkardharke (talk) 16:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]