User talk:Onestar12

I am editor and journalist, hopefully i will add more information on this source.

March 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Progressive Foundation has been reverted.
Your edit here to Progressive Foundation was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/ProgressiveNGO/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:03, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Progressive Foundation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Progressive Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 09:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Shardul Rathod. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 10:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Onestar12, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Onestar12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Progressive Foundation

The article Progressive Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources showing any notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 22:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC) add more information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:107:FB85:C26:84BE:B048:B7C7 (talk) 16:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Clubjustin. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Shardul Rathod— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 09:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Progressive Foundation have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Progressive Foundation was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/ProgressiveNGO) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kamaal Rashid Khan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kamaal Rashid Khan was changed by Onestar12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925878 on 2017-03-12T04:45:41+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Progressive Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Progressive Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 22:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Progressive Foundation. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PamD 09:34, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Onestar12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Ishueditor". The reason given for Ishueditor's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigatio

Blocking administrator: Richwales (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are clearly related to that editor and are now blocked indefinitely as a result. Yamla (talk) 14:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hope some one mis use my IP. i am not aware about above blocked user. please review my account

help me

i am blocked for using my account please help me to unblock. and i am not aware about given reason

i think some one hack

i dont know any ishueditor, so please unblock my user name. or tell me other way, please help

You need to explain why you have used the exact same IP address and edited the exact same articles as this other editor. --Yamla (talk) 11:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am here to create new page and to provide same good sources.

You still need to explain why you have used the exact same IP address and edited the exact same articles as this other editor. --Yamla (talk) 12:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am finding who used my PC. let me find out it please... can you tell me how many timmes used my IP by some one else. and suggest to me what to do now ?

No, this information is not available. And the onus is on you to explain why we should possibly believe you, an editor using the same IP address and editing the same articles, is completely unrelated to that other editor. We simply don't believe you. --Yamla (talk) 14:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We've wasted enough time with you. Talk page access has been revoked. --Yamla (talk) 11:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hoping i can continue my contribution

hi, i am hoping i can continue my editing