User talk:Onca killer

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sim ou Não has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sim ou Não was changed by Onca killer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851362 on 2018-08-11T16:18:29+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:18, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Onca killer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Onca killer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Essa Mina é Louca moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Essa Mina é Louca, does not have enough sources and content as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Natureium (talk) 19:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tribo das Danadas

A tag has been placed on Tribo das Danadas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 17:29, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kika (song)

The article Kika (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 17:30, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bumbum Granada

A tag has been placed on Bumbum Granada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meu Pau Te Ama

A tag has been placed on Meu Pau Te Ama requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 20:57, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Te Jurupinga

A tag has been placed on Te Jurupinga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 21:08, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of songs

Please don't create more articles about songs without first checking to see if they meet Wikipedia's notability requirements, located at WP:NSONG. As mentioned above, you can start an article in the draft article space if you need more time to work on them, and then you can submit it for evaluation when you are ready. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paralisa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paralisa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paralisa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. White Shadows ^{Let’s Talk} 01:34, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Paralisa, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 01:55, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Indestrutível for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indestrutível is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indestrutível until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. White Shadows ^{Let’s Talk} 23:41, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Indestrutível, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Creating articles that are clearly not notable wastes the time of a lot of people. Please take the time to understand what "notability" means according to Wikipedia. Continuing to create articles that you should reasonably know are not notable my be construed as disruptive editing, and may lead to sanctions. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2050 (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2050 (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2050 (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:10, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hasta La Vista (Coca-Cola Brazil song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hasta La Vista (Coca-Cola Brazil song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasta La Vista (Coca-Cola Brazil song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kpg jhp jm 01:23, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tribo das Danadas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tribo das Danadas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribo das Danadas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kpg jhp jm 01:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fuleragem

A tag has been placed on Fuleragem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:51, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:38, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have to agree with GorillaWarfare here. You've been warned plenty of times about creating useless articles that do not have a snowball's chance of staying in the encyclopedia. If you are going to stick around, you need to take the time to read up on our notability guidelines, and while you are at it, WP:Communication is required, an essay that explains why you need to engage and discuss when many people are complaining about your actions. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, you have to discuss sometimes. It is also a consensus project, so we are all bound by the standards agreed to by our peers. This means not wasting a lot of people's time by creating articles that clearly do not pass the criteria at WP:GNG. We aren't being jerks about it, it really does waste the time of a lot of people, and is frustrating. So don't do that. Otherwise, if you ignore all this, ignore the block, then go back to doing the same thing, you will be blocked longer, or for an indefinite time. We are willing to help you learn the basics here, but you have to communicate first, the discussion can't just be one way, with us talking AT you rather than with you. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 13:39, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ta Tum Tum

A tag has been placed on Ta Tum Tum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese citations

You can see a lot of errors at the bottom of Novo (song) because the citations are in Portuguese. Two things: 1) you need to either use the en-wiki citation templates, e.g. {{cite web}}, {{cite news}}, or in some cases you can use a workaround like {{citar web}}. I've fixed that now, just letting you know for next time. 2) The Portuguese references suggest you may be translating from the Portuguese article. That's fine, but you have to say that that's what your doing in the edit summaries, to maintain attribution. There are some instructions at Wikipedia:Translation § How to translate. Hope this helps. Thanks for making the article. › Mortee _talk 16:33, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Jet Plane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brega-funk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Brega-funk, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 15:34, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ta Tum Tum moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ta Tum Tum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Irmã Gostosa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Irmã Gostosa, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly creating articles that fall short of our notability and verifiability policies, and failing to communicate with the community, after being given repeated warnings and being told this needs to change. We can try to work out an unblock scenario, but you need to communicate..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:17, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I linked it above but it is worth repeating: WP:Communication is required. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pega a Receita

A tag has been placed on Pega a Receita requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:57, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Regarding Speedy Deletion

Hello, Onca killer. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created , Pega a Receita, has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject.

Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.

The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process.

You may find this tool useful for finding sources: Google custom search

Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too. You can ask for help at the TEAHOUSE

There is more information at Wikipedia:Community_portal Cheers, and happy editing. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rebeca (song)

A tag has been placed on Rebeca (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:45, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Onca killer

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Onca killer, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 05:32, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Brega-funk

Hello, Onca killer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brega-funk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 18:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Irmã Gostosa

Hello, Onca killer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Irmã Gostosa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 16:13, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]