User talk:Olorinjoyce

Notability of Dunk Ryders Records

A tag has been placed on Dunk Ryders Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi

speedy

hi there. if you think that the subject of the article is notable under the standard at WP:MUSIC then put the "hangon" tag on the article. if the article was deleted already, then recreate it, but make sure to include in the article references for the subject's notability. any questions, feel free to ask. best, --brew crewer (yada, yada) 23:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dunk Ryders Records

A tag has been placed on Dunk Ryders Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SaveThePoint (talk) 01:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dunk Ryders Records

I've just looked over the deleted revisions of the article. The record label has only released one single and hasn't really been covered in independent secondary sources, according to the article, which doesn't make it notable under Wikipedia's organization notability guidelines. I would be willing to undelete the article for a deletion review; that will get the opinions of multiple people. Thanks for your contributions, and I'm sorry for causing you trouble. Best regards, Keilana_(recall) 03:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dunk Ryders Records

Well, first off, welcome to Wikipedia. I'm sorry your start here has been a little rocky...having hours of work deleted on sight is certainly not the sort of welcome I would want. That said, I agree with Keilana's comments above. We (and that "we" now includes you) are an encyclopedia, so we're trying to cover noteworthy subjects, and the best way to ensure that subjects are noteworthy are to see examples of secondary source material talking about them. When I look up Dunk Ryders Records on Google, I come up with pretty much nothing, which indicates that it's just not that notable at the current time. Still, don't be disheartened. New contributors are always welcome, and I'm sure your edits will be gladly accepted elsewhere on Wikipedia. SaveThePoint (talk) 08:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soundz

If you are not done with a new article you have created, please place the {{underconstruction}} tag on it. This will avoid confusion between editors. I have added it to the Soundz article for you. Thank you. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 23:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: One Chance

Please provide proof that the single was released (from a reliable source, like an established store or a magazine article). There has been so much speculation and rumor added to this article that I'm going to remove any claims like that that aren't backed up with a verifiable reference from a reliable source. Closenplay (talk) 21:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All those links (including the picture on their website) are for the album Private—not a single—which was scheduled for release Nov 2006 but was pulled at the last minute. A photo of a CD cover is not proof; anyone with a computer can make a CD cover, even for something that doesn't exist. So many One Chance tracks have leaked from that album I wouldn't be surprised if what you have is a bootleg (especially if it was only available "via special order"). Closenplay (talk) 02:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Scooter Smiff

A tag has been placed on Scooter Smiff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 17:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Olorinjoyce! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Soundz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Soundz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soundz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soundz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 11:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]