User talk:Oliverrox

Welcome

Hello, Oliverrox! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! 5 albert square (talk) 19:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of Brian Slater

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brian Slater requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. I42 (talk) 20:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tanya Branning

Please stop inserting fields like 'romances' into the infobox for the EastEnders articles. Fields like 'romances' aren't supported by the infobox and therefore won't work. Only the fields that are already there are supported and will work. Please stop trying to add this, any questions feel free to ask me on my talk page --5 albert square (talk) 21:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Bianca Jackson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. CWenger (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Spencer (Hollyoaks)‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You changed his date of death, it was set on a different day to the one he died in the real world. RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 19:59, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eva Strong, you may be blocked from editing. She leaves tomorrow, plus you removed her from the character list. We'll help you at the wikiproject if you're interested in editing regularly. RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 20:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lauren Branning, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 19:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of EastEnders characters (2007)‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Along with Eastenders articles and Emmerdale characters too.. stop adding (half), stop changing duration dates. There are discussions on wikiprojects explaining why they are set out the way they are. RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 20:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Whitney Dean, you may be blocked from editing. GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 20:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of EastEnders characters (2010), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your obviously doing it on purpose now. You have started adding inlaws. RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 20:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

This has been going on for three months now. We have ignored quite a few, assumed good faith so many. However you seem to be abusing editing privelages. You don't even ask why you have warning, you don't attempt to ask at an wikiproject, any user who reverts your edits and so forth - what content should be added to the infobox. However from warning I find it hard to believe you haven't noticed what you add is discouraged for various reasons. It's unencyclopedic information you are adding, in universe style. Please stop now. General consensus is blood relatives, spouses. Also duration dates depend on real world info, if the character is continuous, if the actor is still under contract therefore intended to appear still. Such as with Lauren Branning, she technically never left.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 20:31, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kat Moon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 15:12, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Hollyoaks characters (2010), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Only warning as you do not repond or listen to anyone who gives warning. You carry on regardless and vandalise pages. You are making a noticable number of disruptive edits to numerous articles. An edit to Steph Cunningham shows you changed her last appearance date, ignoring the fact there is a reliable source to say otherwise. Adding unused in-universe romance fileds List of Hollyoaks characters (2010) and many other pages, when their is consensus not to use them. Coronation Street articles have been comprimised by you too, other editors have been forced to revert your edits. In another case you listed a character as anothers father, when infact this is not the case and there are reliable sources in place to say otherwise. Please stop your disruptive edits that have been happening for a period of 5 months now. Rain the 1 ^BAM 20:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing namely changing infoboxes and editing against consensus. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 20:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Theresa McQueen, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 21:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding trivial relatives to infoboxes like you did with this edit to Alfie Moon. It is the consensus that trivial relatives like these should not be included in infoboxes yet you continue to edit against consensus by adding them. If you do this again then you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Continually editing against consensus may lead to an indefinite block from Wikipedia.--5 albert square (talk) 21:23, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add notes to infoboxes to prevent content change to duration as you did at Leanne Battersby. If you do this again then you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Continually editing against consensus may lead to an indefinite block from Wikipedia. GSorby – Ping! 17:41, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Amy Barnes, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RaintheOne ^BAM 17:47, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Texas Longford. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RaintheOne ^BAM 17:47, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lynsey Nolan, you may be blocked from editing. RaintheOne ^BAM 17:48, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mercedes McQueen, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please do not carry out test edits such as those you did to this article, someone could have viewed your revision and presumed the false info was correct. RaintheOne ^BAM 18:35, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Silas Blissett, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please don't make huge unsourced edits without any OOU info. D4nnyw14 (talk) 12:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Nearly all of your edits have to be reverted, either because they are irrelevant, unsourced or unhelpful. You have been warned about this a number of times, yet I note that you have never made a single edit to a talk or usertalk page. Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, and competence is required to edit succesfully here. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 15:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 16:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]