User talk:OlanMR

December 2023

Hello, I'm Sungodtemple. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to André Santos have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 13:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at André Santos. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MacAddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 14:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:OlanMR/sandbox

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:OlanMR/sandbox, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 14:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by QuantumRealm was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 14:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OlanMR! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 14:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. VViking_TalkEdits 14:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]