User talk:Ojay123/Archives/1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ojay123. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
New English School
Just a note, on the page New_English_School_(Jordan), you reverted an IP. The first time (he/she) edited, he just removed a section which was actually just very thought out vandalism, and was reverted by someone else. I suppose he didn't know why he had been reverted, so in his next edit, he just added some text (the edit you saw), and was reverted by you. He did it again, slightly different, and was reverted by you again. I know you obviously didn't know this section was vandalism—there is an established user who has a strange vendetta against this article; I discuss this on the talk page, please see my comments on the discussion page, under the section "User Aua." I tried to help this article before (as this editor, for some reason, had an extreme vendetta against it, even putting a WP:OFFICE tag on it at one point, among very strange/dubious other acts - see the other sections on the talk page). It seems the article doesn't have enough editors looking after it, and as the editor didn't get his way with deleting it (7/7 editors supported it on AfD, but he page-blanked it anyway, his 8-edit switch up: [[1]]), now he's trying to make a WP:POINT by adding egregious information to it and removing all appropriately cited information slowly. Please, some more eyes!
- 66.183.69.201 (talk) 06:32, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- IP is referring to your edit here which was made because blanking an entire referenced section without leaving a message on the talk page is considered vandalism. Your revert was in its place. He tried to do the same thing today, but I reverted him (he did that with other articles too). Should you want to see the article's talk page for the discussion with the IP, be my guest but it's basically the IP trying to promote the school with utter disregard to WP's rules on copyright and advertising while at the same time removing information critical to the school-be it referenced or not- and attacking other editors like myself and User:Roux.
- Cheers!
- Λuα (Operibus anteire) 08:42, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- You reverted my edits as TW vandalism after I had left a message on the talkpage. Double standard for you?
- That's why I made a comment on the talk page, lol. What's really funny is if you check the references of that "entire referenced section." They're actually bogus. That's what I say on the talk page. Furthermore, Aua continually accuses me of odd things. Like here, "He tried to do the same thing today, but I reverted him;" I'm not that same IP!!! I would (as I did and have done time and again) have mentioned it on the talk page! I am not a student, as he continually asserts (I discuss this on talk). I'm not trying to promote the school. I have told Aua this time and again. Yes, I did that on the John Doe page, but that has nothing to do with this. Look at it and you would probably have done the same thing, that list is extremely against wiki-standards, and I discussed it on the talkpage. The information critical of the school is being added by Aua on purpose; it is a WP:POINT as a reaction to our old conflict on that page, read the talk page. Aua wants the article deleted. I saw that 7/7 AfD editors didn't, so I tried to appropriately save the page. This extremely offended him, now he's trying to slowly degrade the article as a WP:POINT.
- 66.183.69.201 (talk) 09:34, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- Diplomatic answer, Ojay123. Appreciated.
- Cheers!
- Λuα (Operibus anteire) 09:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
- Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
- News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:25, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Editor reveiw
Gave you a review, just so you know. Marx01 Tell me about it 02:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello
I have written an interesting article about my opinions on war and pacifism, click here for more Woodnot talk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.242.179.53 (talk) 11:23, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Arrgh
Saw the phone at the top of your page, thought I had a new message... --King Öomie 15:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Ojay123/Archives, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Gary King (talk) 04:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Re: Question From Ojay 123
Use {{multicol}} for multiple columsn. Gary King (talk) 20:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Re: Adding Pictures
Help:Images and other uploaded files should help. Gary King (talk) 16:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- To delete images from the Commons, you have to request that it be deleted. On Wikipedia, you place one of the tags from Wikipedia:Csd#Images_and_media on the image. Feel free to ask questions at WP:HD because I don't always have the answer :) Gary King (talk) 17:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Newsletter
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Outreach/July {{subst:2009}} Newsletter}} Ojay123 (talk) 02:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: Edit Count
Use this tool :) Gary King (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Dotson Ice Shelf
Hi. Why did you post a deletion notice for this page on my talk page? I cannot think of a valid reason for deleting this page. RedWolf (talk) 23:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey Ojay :)
I see you noticed my edit to Mary Whitehouse and it appears you have reverted it. May i ask why this is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.193.117 (talk) 16:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Question on recent revert
I just signed up for wikipedia because I felt that there was more to be said about the article relating to Pulsed Laser Deposition. For my first post, I'll admit, it was a bit bland and some of the information was scattered elsewhere in the article. Going forward, do you have any suggestions on how to make additions that won't get reverted by those who patrol wikipedia such as yourself? I don't want to get discouraged too early in this process. Thanks
UNCfizix (talk) 15:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: New user template
Template:Welcome Gary King (talk) 01:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Please be a little more careful ..
This edit [2] is not to your credit. Huggle and rollback are powerful tools, but they are not foolproof, and the onus is on you to ensure that the edits you make are correct. Philip Trueman (talk) 10:49, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Your RfA
Hello, I am very sorry to tell you this but the chance of your RfA succeeding now is infinitesimal. I suggest withdrawing now and trying again after a few thousand edits which will show that you have enough experience. Sincerely, Triplestop x3 19:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: User Subpages
Use {{Db-u1}}. Gary King (talk) 02:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
CNN Story
Maybe it's referring to Wikipedia:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:05, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- (pasted from helpdesk) Flagged revisions will be enabled on biographies. Basically what it means is that editors will have to "sight" (review) edits by anonymous and new editors in order to prevent (possible libellous) vandalism. As is typical with stories about Wikipedia, the mass media a) is having a field day and b) have little to no idea what they are talking about, leading to exaggeration, misleading claims, and outright lies. Oh well - just another day in WikiWorld. Don't worry too much about it. Xenon54 / talk / 23:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- {from helpdesk) It was noted in this weeks Signpost Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-08-24/Technology report. Nanonic (talk) 23:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Really? I must have missed that story! Ojay123 (Talk•E-Mail•Contribs•Sandbox) 03:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
on 1984
Yes, I have read 1984, it really messes with your brain when you read it, such as when Winston is being tortured. George Orwell used to be a socialist/communist, but after fighting in the spanish civil war,and seeing how perverted communism had become, he became highly anti-Stalinism, Stalinism I think was the most popular form of communism amongst politicians, but I think China and Vietnam are now more Leninist (incidently, China is probably the one country that fits the description of Oceana and the other super-powers the most (in my opinion)). His two main anti-Stalinist books where, Animal Farm, in which he explains in a fabel how the pricipals of a revolution get perverted to a point in which nothing has changed at all, and 1984, where he predicts what the world would be like if Stalinists took over.
There are some plot holes in 1984, such as the Ingsoc revolution occuring in 1960, so someone who fought in it could be 44 more or less, yet the book says all knowledge of the past has been eradicated by falsifying the records, yet this imaginary 40 year old could easily remember it. There are a number of possible ways around this, such as mass murder, hypnotism, "forced forgetting", but this isn't really explained. Another thing is the fact that people leave things behind, which are later found by acheologists or ameteurs. This is breifly looked at with the glass coral, but for the most part this two is unexplained.
You said that the different super-powers in Oceana are different forms of socialism, but they are effectively all Stalinists, who only go to war with one another to do the things you described.
Contrary to popular beleif, Stalin wasn't at all interested in war and expansion, he only invaded Finland and East Poland etc. to keep Hitler happy in a vein attempt to prevent war with Germany. His rule was in many respects more similar to the third age of death, with Nikolai Yezhov starting what has been called "the Meat Grinder" during the Great Purge, in which towns were given death quotas and his ministerial building was designed to be like an abatoir. Ultimately he got so powerful that Stalin became afraid of him and he was ultimately consumed by his own "Meat Grinder". It is even possible that Stalin himself was destroyed by the "Meat grinder" in order to prevent world war 3.
I feel sometimes that the Green party are essentially Marxists, and that more extreme groups like the Earth First society are essentially Stalinists (check out the green parties non-enviromental policies and they'll probably be highly Marxist)
You wanted to know what my opinions on oil are. Well, I don't really think about it often, but I think that I'll be more like George Bush. But needs must, I will be interested in investing in energy effecient cars (I myself am interested in building a completely flat car for long distance movements). I would also like to crack down on people (such as my mother) who seem to get into a car for extremely short distances(that can't be good in the long run).
Either way, I'm currently trying to move the article to a more appropriate site, such as Etherything2. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodnot (talk • contribs) 16:05, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
- Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Re: Centering Pages
Use <center>TEXT</center>
. Gary King (talk) 01:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Signature
Can you tell me how to put color on my signature.--Dwayneflanders (talk) 01:12, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
RE:RE: Signature
Thanks because of you it works now, thanks so much!
Have a nice day!
--Dwayneflanders talk 01:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Energy Company - Help
Hello Ojay123,
I hope it is ok for me to contact you directly. I've been suggested to contact you as you are an active participant in the WikiProjects Companies and shows interest in Enegry Companies. My name is Vanessa and I am working for Halliburton. We are still new with Wikipedia but we have read the policies on Wikipedia and fully understand the concept of "Conflict of Interest" and "NPOV". We would like to ask you if you will be interested in helping us with the article. The article Halliburton (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Halliburton) is currently flagged and we have made some suggestions directly on the Halliburton discussion page regarding the company profile that is outdated and few sentences in the article. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Halliburton#Company_Profile_and_Other_Information_-_to_be_updated
Please let us know if it's ok to contact you directly in the future and I apologize for any trouble.
Thank you!
Vana2009 (talk) 16:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hello Ojay123, thank you for your prompt response in leaving a message on my talk page. I have replied to your questions on my talk page, sorry I am still new with Wikipedia ... am not sure if I am supposed to reply on your talk page or mine :) Thanks again!
- Vana2009 (talk) 01:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
RE:
Sorry i was busy creating an article. Nevermind about the signature, i figured out how to do it. Yes i did empty my talk page because it was too much content on my page. -- ♠ Dwayneflanders' Talk 00:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Well my contents box went away how do i put it back? -- ♠ Dwayneflanders' Talk 01:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for restoring my talk page. :) -- ♠ Dwayneflanders' Talk 01:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure your content box is there...
Ojay123 (Talk•E-Mail•Contribs•Sandbox) 01:41, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Energy Company - Help
Hello Ojay123,
I hope it is ok for me to contact you directly. I've been suggested to contact you as you are an active participant in the WikiProjects Companies and shows interest in Enegry Companies. My name is Vanessa and I am working for Halliburton. We are still new with Wikipedia but we have read the policies on Wikipedia and fully understand the concept of "Conflict of Interest" and "NPOV". We would like to ask you if you will be interested in helping us with the article. The article Halliburton (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Halliburton) is currently flagged and we have made some suggestions directly on the Halliburton discussion page regarding the company profile that is outdated and few sentences in the article. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Halliburton#Company_Profile_and_Other_Information_-_to_be_updated
Please let us know if it's ok to contact you directly in the future and I apologize for any trouble.
Thank you!
Vana2009 (talk) 16:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hello Ojay123, thank you for your prompt response in leaving a message on my talk page. I have replied to your questions on my talk page, sorry I am still new with Wikipedia ... am not sure if I am supposed to reply on your talk page or mine :) Thanks again!
- Vana2009 (talk) 01:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
RE:
Sorry i was busy creating an article. Nevermind about the signature, i figured out how to do it. Yes i did empty my talk page because it was too much content on my page. -- ♠ Dwayneflanders' Talk 00:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Well my contents box went away how do i put it back? -- ♠ Dwayneflanders' Talk 01:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for restoring my talk page. :) -- ♠ Dwayneflanders' Talk 01:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure your content box is there...
Ojay123 (Talk•E-Mail•Contribs•Sandbox) 01:41, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009
- From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
- News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009
- Opinion essay: White Barbarian
- Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
- Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
- News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009
- New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
- Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
- News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009
- From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
- Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
- Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
- News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
- Dispatches: Sounds
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
- News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
- In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Editor review archived
Since it has been well over 30 days since you requested to be reviewed, I've gone ahead and archived your request as part of my effort to cleanup Editor Review. You may view your review here. Thanks & happy editing. If you have any questions, please message me on my talk page. =D Netalarmtalk 04:47, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
- Interview: Interview with John Blossom
- News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
- In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Your GA nomination of Al Williamson
The article Al Williamson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Al Williamson/GA1 for things needed to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey Ojay123,
Nice to see some work being done on the article. Unfortunatley, the source only states that Arlene Williamson passed away and Al Williamson subsequently remarried, without providing a date. According to an article in Third Rail #1, he had remarried by 1981, although they don't specify the exact date. I think I'll be able to do some work on the article this week. Good luck!
Cheers,
--Scott Free (talk) 22:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, how are the revisions going? Do you want me to take another look yet? Jezhotwells (talk) 22:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
- Article contest: Durova wins 2009 WikiCup
- Conference report: WikiSym features research on Wikipedia
- Election report: 2009 ArbCom elections report
- Audit Subcommittee: Inaugural Audit Subcommittee elections underway
- Dispatches: Wikipedia remembers the Wall
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: Project banner meta-templates
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
- New pages experiment: Wikipedians test the water at new page patrol
- German controversy: German Wikipedia under fire from inclusionists
- Multimedia usability: Multimedia usability meeting concludes in Paris
- Election report: Arbitration Committee candidate nominations open 10 November
- News and notes: Ant images, public outreach, and more
- In the news: Beefeater vandalism, interview, and more
- Sister projects: Meta-wiki interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Al Williamson
So the article made the grade! Thanks for your time and effort with the GA evaluation - Great work - much appreciated. Best, --Scott Free (talk) 17:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser begins
- Bulgarian award: Bulgarian Wikipedia gets a prestigious award
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Several candidates standing
- In the news: German lawsuit, Jimbo interview and more
- Sister projects: Wiktionary interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
- Uploading tool: New tool for photo scavenger hunts
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Nominations closing November 24
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser continues
- News and notes: Government stubs, Suriname exhibit, milestones and more
- In the news: The Decline of Wikipedia, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election begins December 1, using SecurePoll
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
- From the editors: 250th issue of the Signpost
- Editorial: A digital restoration
- Election report: ArbCom election in full swing
- Interview: Interview with David G. Post
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
- Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
- Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election result announced
- News and notes: Fundraiser update, milestones and more
- In the news: Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
- News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
- News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
- News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more
- In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
- From the editor: Call for writers
- 2009 in review: 2009 in Review
- Books: New Book namespace created
- News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
- News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Wikipedia's birthday and more
- In the news: Wikipedia on the road, and more
- WikiProject report: Where are they now?
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
- BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar
- Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century
- News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more
- In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?
- WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
- News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more
- In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more
- Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
- News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
- In the news: Macmillan's Wiki-textbooks and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Mammals
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
- Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed
- News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
- News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Java
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
- News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs
- Dispatches: GA Sweeps end
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
- Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts
- News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page
- WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
- Sister projects: A handful of happenings
- WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
- News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup
- Features and admins: This week in approvals
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
- Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
- News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
- From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars
- Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders
- News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!
- In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!
- Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News