User talk:OfficialChristianDeath

Image:Blasphemiae.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Blasphemiae.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —P ilotguy (ptt) 22:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to be fair

I would like to invite you to read the entire Christian Death article as it is now. Yes, there were unfair statements and weasel words that made it biased against the present band and Valor, but I removed all of those so that it is completely neutral. I want you to see that I'm trying to make the article fair and accurate. The best way to present the article is to present the history of the band in chronological order. Every good story starts at the beginning...And without Rozz Williams there would be no Christian Death... Rzrscm 09:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--- You would be best working with me then not against me, as without Valor there would not be a christian death either, as Rozz did leave it behind. After Rozz left Christian Death, the bands commercial success continued and escalated, Scriptures, Sex and Drugs and Jesus Christ, Pornographic Messiah, Amen, Born Again Anti Christian .... to name a few, did very well here in Europe especially.

Unfortunately, the Eva O thing is unfounded fact she has actually never participated in Christian Death, Valor has never even met her. The fact that she was close to Rozz at some stage in his life does not make her a member of Christian Death or the illegal touring that they did under that name.

You need to make sure that the infobox at the top states the CURRENT LINEUP and its active status. To leave it out/ replacing it in this way is damaging my clients representation on this page, which that way is not a good thing to do.

As to the christiandeath1334 comments. Christian Death(TM) is our intellectual property, therefore it actually is not helpful to add in here that people are still leaching off Rozz and Valor.

If you want to be constructive, I will forward you a copy of the draft wiki document, for your information once completed by email.

Who have I the pleasure of dealing with, please mail me? Finally, please don't add comments half way up the Christian Death talk page, as it changes the way the page and subsequent comments look - i won't warn you as I am hoping you can work to help make the page better. (also I have been forgetting to sign the pages).

Regards OfficialChristianDeath 10:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CHRISTIAN DEATH (TM) SOCIETY OfficialChristianDeath 10:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've wanted to work with you and not against you all along...I've been just trying to keep it fair, as I've continuously stated. My e-mail is adamrothraisdead@yahoo.com. Rzrscm 10:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is looking better. Removing the overtones dissecting the fan base makes for easier reading. Thanks for the mail address. OfficialChristianDeath 17:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Los fcover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Los fcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lover of sin

An editor has nominated Lover of sin, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lover of sin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 09:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:CdNEW.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CdNEW.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CdNEW.jpg

Hello, OfficialChristianDeath. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:CdNEW.jpg) was found at the following location: User:OfficialChristianDeath. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:02, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CoverMARK.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CoverMARK.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Christiandeath

A tag has been placed on Christiandeath, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Od Mishehu 12:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Group Photo A copy.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Group Photo A copy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 10:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please state your problem, and add the {{helpme}} tag once you do. --ST47Talk·Desk 10:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HELP

Page hijacked by users changing the information to unfactual and totally biased against the truth. Please advise. The article is christian death. Musch of the article is conjecture and fabrication. I am the official agent for christian death, and i require that this be put right.

Hi. :) Keeping in mind requirements of Wikipedia's policy on Conflict of Interest, you are welcome to revise incorrect and biased information yourself. Editors are encouraged to discuss disputes on the article's talk page. I've looked over the discussion at Talk:Christian Death, and it seems like that's exactly what you're doing. You may want to review the dispute resolution procedures if you believe that conversation is not fruitful. If you reach impasse there, you may broaden the discussion with other editors through several avenues, most notably Requests for comment. Good luck. --Moonriddengirl 13:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest, and legal threats

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Christian Death, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

A report on this issue has been posted at the Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Christian_Death. You are welcome to join in the discussion there.

You should also be a aware of the policy known as Wikipedia:No legal threats, and refrain from any threats against other Wikipedia users, including cease-and-desist orders. EdJohnston 14:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:OfficialChristianDeath

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:OfficialChristianDeath requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://motolyrics.com/christian-death.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]