User talk:Officer8

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Officer8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Admins, i had never posted any advertisement links and never did any Sockpuppet , i think i was being wrongly accused by a user call "Officer781" who did not want me to improve on the page "https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_universities_in_Singapore" all the links which i placed are directed at the universities website and i am totally NOT working with the universities at all. All I wanted to do was to improve on the wiki page so that people reading the good page of "https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_universities_in_Singapore" can have even better information on hand. But to my surprised after editing i was being blocked and accused of advertisement links and sockpuppet which i totally did not do it intentionally and my only thinking was to help wikipedia improve on its contents thats All. I hope that the user "Officer781" will not wrongly or falsely accusing other users in future by giving false accusations of others, this "Officer781" is preventing other users from improving wikipedia contents, now after being wrongly accused i am totally confused and i am quite worried that others will be facing the same accusation like me, this is why i felt that i need to let you the Wikipedia admins know and help, thanks and best of regards. Officer8 (talk) 05:21, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't feel that unblocking is the best course of action given the behavior you've demonstrated or this explanation. --slakr^\ talk / 09:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Officer8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25247 was submitted on May 18, 2019 05:31:50. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 05:31, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS review closed. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:15, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I reported you was not to do with any content. It has to do with your username. It is basically my username with the 7 and 1 removed. Please see Wikipedia:Username policy for more details. However it was uncovered in the sockpuppet investigation that you may have links to other users. I won't comment on that as I am not an experienced investigator.--Officer781 (talk) 05:49, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You mean you had trademarked officer userid??

Do you mean that only you alone can use the userid officer? And/or with any other numbers letters added or asaociated with the word "officer" in wiki? If this is so then how is this fair? You mean anyone else cannot register userid with word "officer"?? This is very narrow minded of you. I joined wiki thinking that its a very good platform asi always read from wiki pages so i thou of also editing and improve on a page. But to my worst night mare i was blocked my contents deleted and was also accused of what socket issue. So many problems just because i want to improve and contribute to wiki?? This is ridiculous. If you want to be admin you must be fair and see if the writer or contributor is he/she really trying to contribute and improve or is he/she trying to play a fool or advertise. But you dis not even check or be fair. You just accuse and blame? And worst delete off good contents? I think the real wiki admin should block You instead so that future real contributors can put up good contents without fear or being threaten by you! Officer8 (talk) 09:53, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chill mate. Don't take offence and don't personal attack. Create a new user ID that does not impersonate other users. If you don't have any ill will it is OK. The reason for this impersonation rule is because it can cause problems on Wikipedia especially if the impersonating user is up to no good. I only removed the links, I did not delete good contents. Links on Wikipedia violate Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links,_images,_or_media_files. Notice I did not even revert your latest edit. Read thoroughly the WP:USERNAME and WP:NOT policies, don't violate any of them, and be nice to users. As long as you follow all these you should be OK. All the best!--Officer781 (talk) 15:24, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anyways, I'm sorry if me or any other user came across as toxic to you. Especially since there are not many Singaporeans on Wikipedia it is always good to see more editing. Also, I don't have any aspirations to be admin, it is simply too stressful. I edit Wikipedia out of leisure. I edited the university pages at one point but I don't do so anymore as I have other interests in science and linguistics. If you have moved on to another account do feel free to log into this account and reply me if we make peace.--Officer781 (talk) 04:25, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]