User talk:OddHerring

Hello, OddHerring, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 06:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Warning

Hi OddHerring! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Template:History of Poland several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Template talk:History of Poland, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Merangs (talk) 23:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spurious edit war warning on my talkpage

As an editor of several years, you should already be aware that a single revert in an article is not edit warring. I reverted your edit to several "Template:History of <country>" pages and gave a reason. A coat of arms is tied to a very specific period. A map is far more generic and suitable for a history template that could be applied to an article of any era, as it pertains to the land involved, and not a period specific symbol. WP:BRD would be a sensible next step, not instantly reverting me and putting a spurious edit warring warning on my talk page. I see another editor has issues with your revert behaviour as well. Please act more collegiately. (Hohum ^@) 18:51, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, and sorry, I didn't really read the edit warring guidelines before I posted that. I created my account several years ago, but only started editing this year. I'm reading the guidelines as I get more involved, but not very actively. I've been burned many times by entering online communities quickly, getting very invested, and discovering too late that they don't give a damn about (or actively hate) members that aren't part of the "special group" and will kick me out over petty nonsense, wasting my time and mental energy.

As for the arms being too specific, I wanted to use arms that could represent all (or most) of that countries history, but the "another editor" you are referring to seemed to disagree. I also really hate the maps, they're just generally ugly on a website like this, a lot of them are barely recognizable, they just scream "2009 leftovers" for some reason; probably it's because that's when they're from. Almost all of my contributions have been about replacing old COA and trying to standardize the Sodacan-Heralder style, so removing the maps was a logical extension of that. OddHerring (talk) 19:39, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before making a widespread change to history templates, I suggest raising the idea at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History. There was likely a reason they chose maps instead of crests. They may agree that crests are better, but that would be the place to get honest feedback and consensus on it. (Hohum ^@) 20:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'm just going to drop the matter if that's what I'm being asked to do. I'm not going to attend committee meetings and petition councils for permission to change an image file. Ridiculous. No wonder this thing is so half-baked. OddHerring (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't what I suggested, or what is required. I advised seeking advice and cooperating with other editors interested in history articles. (Hohum ^@) 20:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mantle and pavilion (heraldry), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bourbon Restoration. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Remsense. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Flags of Austria-Hungary, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 诉 07:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Carter (Tcr25). I noticed that you removed the flag from the Know Nothing infobox stating that it wasn't sourced. The image file is a digital recreation of an attested flag for the party, though that wasn't well stated on the page. I've updated the file information on Commons and linked from the photographic version several other instances of the flag. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 20:57, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mongol Empire, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense ‥ 论 00:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who do I contact to block you for disruptive editing? Since you keep reverting my edits with zero actual argument. OddHerring (talk) 00:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]