User talk:Occi31000
Welcome!
|
Bir Hakeim
[edit]Please stop your disruptive edits to the Bir Hakeim page, the article makes the scope of French and British involvement in that part of the battle of Gazala clear with citations and references. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 18:57, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
I believe this page is about the siege of Bir Hakeim and not the battle of Gazala. Please add your edits to the Gazala page if you wish and not the Bir Hakeim page.Occi31000 (talk) 19:10, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- The article isn't about the battle of Gazala, it's about the battle of Bir Hakeim which is part of the Battle of Gazala. French and British troops and the DAF took part in the Battle of Bir Hakeim. I should know, I wrote the thing. Please stop your disruptive edits.Keith-264 (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
SO you wrongly wrote about it. Bir Hakeim was maybe part of a bigger engagement (Gazala) BUT at the oasis of Bir Hakeim only Free French troops took part in combat. You're the only one adding disrupting edits on the english page of the battle of Bir Hakeim. Please stop now. Thank youOcci31000 (talk) 20:30, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- You're missing the point, perhaps deliberately. The article is about Bir Hakeim and the French and British operation there. Stop your malicious edits.Keith-264 (talk) 21:33, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
You are the only one here creating malicious edits. Every other translated page have the same translation and yet you are the one constantly changing the english version for I do not know what reason. Again, quit it. You are posting wrong content on a known historic fact, I'll keep adjust it so that it shows the truth about the battle of Bir Hakeim, an engagement were NO British troops took part. This is about the battle of Bir Hakeim, NO British troops were involved in this particular battle!!Occi31000 (talk) 21:41, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- It's not a translated page and you would be well-advised to read the article. Keith-264 (talk) 22:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
I did, and as stated previously the 1st paragraph reads: "The 1st Free French Brigade (Général de brigade Marie Pierre Kœnig) defended the position from 26 May – 11 June against much larger Axis forces of Panzerarmee Afrika (Generaloberst Erwin Rommel)" This is Bir Hakeim, the other battles around this one (That includes British troops) all have their respective pages and thus do not need to be cited in this one.Occi31000 (talk) 22:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- A flare rose, the Axis troops nearby began to fire, the guide of the HQ column got lost and was blown up three times by mines. When Kœnig caught up with the main column, it was blocked by troops of the 90th Light Division and he ordered a rush, regardless of the mines; Lamaze, Captain Bricogne and Lieutenant Dewey were killed in the mêlée.[41] The reception was organised by 550 Company Royal Army Service Corps (RASC) which drove lorries and guided field ambulances with inexperienced rear-area crews, escorted by the 2nd King's Royal Rifle Corps (KRRC) and the 2nd Rifle Brigade on either side. The ambulances became separated in the dark but were recovered and guided to the rendezvous.[42] The commander the 3rd Battalion was captured but most of the brigade managed to break out, reach Bir el Gubi, then withdraw to Gasr-el-Arid by 7:00 a.m. on 11 June. About 2,700 men, including 200 wounded of the original 3,600 men escaped and during the day, British patrols picked up stragglers.[39] Try harderKeith-264 (talk) 22:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- The 7th Motor Brigade ran four supply convoys into Bir Hakeim from 31 May – 7 June.[43] Keith-264 (talk) 23:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
You need to stop... Are you trying to rewrite history or what? NO British troops saw combat at the Bir Hakeim Oasis, they were around and maybe assisted French troops in the retreat but THEY DID NOT see combat. Enough now!Occi31000 (talk) 23:20, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Please stop the malicious editing on this page; the reasons & facts have been given. Shire Lord (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
What is better? A valid edit by an anonymous or an undo made by a stupid user ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.125.113.103 (talk) 18:46, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Stop the malicious editing on this page, facts have been givenOcci31000 (talk) 19:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Please stop edit-warring on the Battle of Bir Hakeim article and read the two policies I have linked above. You have already violated the three-revert rule, but I'm willing to cut you some slack since you're new. However, if you revert again, you will be blocked from editing temporarily. Consider that your last warning. Parsecboy (talk) 03:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Parsecboy (talk) 10:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
December 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Sun (United Kingdom)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 03:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)