User talk:Obhf/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Checker-16x16.png in User:1A72/common.css
Hello 1A72, I have seen that you are using the Checker-16x16.png from the MediaWiki software itself. The file was moved inside the software and you have to use it now from commons: //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5d/Checker-16x16.png
. For more information about the move see bug 69277. Thanks for the adjust in your css. Der Umherirrende 18:54, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks @Umherirrender
Thanks, do I have to do something now? (On mobile right now, will look more closely later.) I can't remember how I'm supposed to format a reply on here, so this is in a subheading, I think. Three equals signs to your two. 1A72 talk 23:56, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Have read some of that technical stuff
Thanks, I have had a skim thru [1] and found it quite interesting, though I only grasped about 5% of what it said. Should get near a PC tomorrow (Thursday 13 Nov.). 1A72 talk 00:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- You should change the urls in your common.css file. Or did you copy that whole file from somewhere? Maybe that location is already fixed and your css just need a new copy.
- But you can also replace just the following strings and all is fine for me and the bug:
//bits.wikimedia.org/skins/common/images/bullet.gif
->//bits.wikimedia.org/static-current/skins/MonoBook/bullet.gif
//bits.wikimedia.org/skins/vector/images/bullet-icon.png
->//bits.wikimedia.org/static-current/skins/Vector/images/bullet-icon.png
//bits.wikimedia.org/skins/common/images/Checker-16x16.png
->//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5d/Checker-16x16.png
- Der Umherirrende 17:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Signature image?
I see from WP:SIGIMAGE that images don't belong in signatures. But what about
<math>
that shows image-like writing? Like this: 23:55, 29 August 2015 (UTC) 23:55, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Two signatures from four tildes
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
When I signed the section I was adding to a talk page, I used four tildes but somehow ended up signing it twice. Is this normal? Should I omit the tildes, if something else adds them automatically? Thanks! About to sign this with four tildes: Oberbahnhof (talk) 14:03, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- I can't tell what happened on that talk page; generally signatures aren't added automatically, but there are some ways to pre-load an edit window with the four tildes already present; maybe that's what happened here. One way to make sure you have the right number of signatures is to use the preview. On this page adding your signature seems to have worked as intended. Huon (talk) 14:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! Oberbahnhof (talk) 14:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Doppelganger account
Doppelganger account checking in to parent account's talk page. Uberbahnhof (talk) 17:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Confirming this is all okay. Oberbahnhof (talk) 17:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Adding that I've created another Oberbahnhof account, after today's renaming, as suggested at WP:CHU. Obahn (talk) 16:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Glad I'm not the only one
Been wondering for ages, and now I see others too can't hear these ogg files in articles. [2] Oberbahnhof (talk) 00:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Obahn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Obahn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |