User talk:OOODDD/Archive 2010
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:OOODDD. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello OOODDD! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 183 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Michele Gurdal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Newfags cant triforce
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Newfags cant triforce, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -Tanner (talk) 22:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- I wouldnt really call it vandalism, but I dont really see the purpose of a redirect to an article that doesn't mention the title of the original page either. —Soap— 22:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Redlinked titles
Hi. I notice that you tend to remove redlinked film titles, especially those of recent or upcoming films. These redlinks serve a purpose - to indicate articles that are in need of creation, and also as a placeholder for articles that will likely soon be created. Please don't delink these titles. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- One that comes to mind is on Hilary Duff, for the film Provinces of Night. The other I noticed was on Keanu Reeves for Jekyll. The link for that one should have been disambiguated to Jekyll (film). Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Actually the Silva article was recently deleted [1], just a week ago. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Red links
You have been approached before [2] regarding removing red links from articles for recent and future films. This removal of the red links for a 2009 film with Keira Knightley needs to stand so that editors can create an article for that film. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Just to let you know that more info can be found about this show on the NY Times website. -Yupik (talk) 21:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
RFA
Have you ever run for RFA? If not, why? Feedback 02:38, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
RfD nomination of Parminder
I have nominated Parminder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ϫ 10:44, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
copyrighted plot summary
Your addition to Loaded (2008 film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Esrever (klaT) 19:23, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - nothing to worry about, a redirect you created (eating pussy) is being discussed at WP:ANI. You are welcome to comment on the issue, but the ANI thread is not about your editing, creation or targetting of the redirect. Mjroots (talk) 19:26, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Happy OOODDD's Day!
 |
User:OOODDD has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
FYI - I saw that you worked on the Charles Bishop event in 2002. After looking at it, I removed it as a US centric event lacking international significance. It had only one other project article. My best to you. ttonyb (talk) 16:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Limit (2003 film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338201.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:43, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Template:Infobox CSI: Miami season 1 episode list has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:37, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Template:Infobox CSI: NY season 1 episode list has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:46, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of 12 September 2008 Dujail bombing for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article 12 September 2008 Dujail bombing, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12 September 2008 Dujail bombing until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Codf1977 (talk) 09:40, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of 28 September 2008 Baghdad bombings for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article 28 September 2008 Baghdad bombings, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/28 September 2008 Baghdad bombings until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Codf1977 (talk) 09:41, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Us herbal.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Us herbal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
date linking
I noticed that you linked 'September 2010' in this edit. Please be informed that the linking of dates and date fragments is no longer best practice. Please refer to WP:Linking and WP:MOSNUM. I have therefore removed said link from the article. Regards, --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 07:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Dubai Pearl
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Dubai Pearl, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Geoff Who, me? 23:25, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Vince shamwow listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vince shamwow. Since you had some involvement with the Vince shamwow redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 05:26, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 | United Arab Emirates NA‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
An Invitation From Sue Gardner
Dear Wikimedia Project Contributor,
I am the assistant to Sue Gardner, the Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation, the organization behind Wikipedia. Sue and I will be in Dubai from December 1-6 for speaking events at TedxDubai and Zayed University's-Dubai Campus.
Sue invites you to meet with her and other local Wikipedia contributors the afternoon of Saturday, December 4. If you are interested to attend please sign-up on using the below link or email me at jowen@wikimedia.org.
WIKI MEET-UP DUBAI WITH SUE GARDNER
- Date: Saturday, December 4, 2010
- Time: 18:30-20:30
- Location: The Pub in the Radisson Blu Duabi Deira Creek
- Address: Bani Yas Road, 476 Dubai
We hope you can attend.
James Owen (talk) 04:29, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Executive Assistant & Board Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
The article Glen Echo Park, Ontario has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This was a private naturist park that has since been closed, and not a government-run "protected area". No indication or evidence of notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PKT(alk) 00:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Glen Echo Park, Ontario for deletion
The article Glen Echo Park, Ontario is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Echo Park, Ontario until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PKT(alk) 17:51, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:Campaignbox Naval engagements of the Korean War has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)